Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relative Positionalism and Variable Arity Relations Cover

Relative Positionalism and Variable Arity Relations

By: T. Scott Dixon  
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Armstrong, DM. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511487552
  2. Dixon, TS. 2018. Plural slot theory. In: Bennet, K and Zimmerman, DW (eds.), Oxford Studies in Meta physics, 11: 193223. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198828198.003.0006
  3. Donnelly, M. 2016. Positionalism revisited. In: Marmodoro, A and Yates, D (eds.), The Metaphysics of Relations, 8099. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0005
  4. Fine, K. 2000. Neutral relations. The Philosophical Review, 109(1): 133. DOI: 10.1215/00318108-109-1-1
  5. Fine, K. 2007. Response to Fraser MacBride. Dialectica, 61(1): 5762. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01094.x
  6. Fine, K. 2012. Guide to ground. In: Correia, F and Schnieder, B (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, 3780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149136.002
  7. Gallian, JA. 2013. Contemporary Abstract Algebra. 8th ed. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
  8. Gaskin, R and Hill, DJ. 2012. On neutral relations. Dialectica, 66(1): 16786. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2012.01294.x
  9. Gilmore, C. 2013. Slots in universals. In: Bennet, K and Zimmerman, DW (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8: 187233. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682904.003.0005
  10. Gilmore, C. 2014. Parts of propositions. Mereology and Location, Kleinschmidt, S (ed.), 156208. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593828.003.0009
  11. Leonard, HS and Goodman, N. 1940. The calculus of individuals and its uses. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(2): 4555. DOI: 10.2307/2266169
  12. Lewis, DK. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
  13. MacBride, F. 2005. The particular-universal distinction: A dogma of metaphysics? Mind, 114(455): 565614. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzi565
  14. MacBride, F. 2007. Neutral relations revisited. Dialectica, 61(1): 2556. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01092.x
  15. MacBride, F. 2014. How involved do you want to be in a non-symmetric relationship? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92(1): 116. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2013.788046
  16. Oliver, A and Smiley, T. 2004. Multigrade predicates. Mind, 113(452): 60981. DOI: 10.1093/mind/113.452.609
  17. Oliver, A and Smiley, T. 2013. Plural Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570423.001.0001
  18. Orilia, F. 2011. Relational order and onto-thematic roles. Metaphysica, 12(1): 118. DOI: 10.1007/s12133-010-0072-0
  19. Orilia, F. 2014. Positions, ordering relations and o-roles. Dialectica 68(2): 283303. DOI: 10.1111/1746-8361.12058
  20. Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.21 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2019
|
Accepted on: Oct 29, 2019
|
Published on: Dec 6, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 T. Scott Dixon, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.