References
- Baker, L. 1997. Why Constitution is Not Identity. Journal of Philosophy, 94: 599–621. DOI: 10.2307/2564596
- Baker, L. 2004. The Ontology of Artifacts. Philosophical Explorations, 7: 99–111. DOI: 10.1080/13869790410001694462
- Bealer, G. 2002.
Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance . In: Conceivability & Possibility, Gendler, TS and Hawthorne, J (ed.), 71–126. Oxford: Clarendon Press. - Bennett, K. 2004. Spatio-Temporal Coincidence and the Grounding Problem. Philosophical Studies, 118: 339–371. DOI: 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000026471.20355.54
- Burke, M. 1994.
Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place . In: Material Constitution, Rea, M (ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. - Cameron, R. 2012. Why Lewis’s Analysis of Modality Succeeds in its Reductive Ambitions. Philosophers’ Imprint, 12(8): 1–21.
- Elder, C. 2004. Real Natures and Familiar Objects, Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Ellis, B. 2009. The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism, Durham: Acumen Press.
- Fine, K. 1982.
Acts, Events, and Things . In: Language and Ontology, Leinfellner, W, Kramer, E and Schank, J (eds.). Austria: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky. - Fine, K. 1992. Aristotle on Matter. Mind, 101: 35–58. DOI: 10.1093/mind/101.401.35
- Fine, K. 1994. Compounds and Aggregates. Nous, 28: 137–158. DOI: 10.2307/2216046
- Fine, K. 1994. Essence and Modality. Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 1–16. DOI: 10.2307/2214160
- Fine, K. 1999. Things and Their Parts. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23: 61–74. DOI: 10.1111/1475-4975.00004
- Fine, K. 2003. The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter. Mind, 112: 195–234. DOI: 10.1093/mind/112.446.195
- Fine, K. 2005.
Our Knowledge of Mathematical Objects . In: Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Gendler, T and Hawthorne, J (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. - Fine, K. 2006.
Relatively Unrestricted Quantification . In: Absolute Generality, Rayo, A and Uzquiano, G (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Fine, K. 2007. Response to Kathrin Koslicki. Dialectica, 61(1): 161–166. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01097.x
- Fine, K. 2008. Coincidence and Form. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 82: 101–118. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2008.00164.x
- Fine, K. 2015. Unified Foundations for Essence and Ground. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(2): 296–311. DOI: 10.1017/apa.2014.26
- Forbes, G. 1985. The Metaphysics of Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Forbes, G. 1986. In Defense of Absolute Essentialism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 11(1): 3–31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00486.x
- Forbes, G. 1989. Languages of Possibility. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Gibbard, A. 1975. Contingent Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4: 187–221. DOI: 10.1007/BF00693273
- Goswick, D. 2010. Bridging the Modal Gap. Journal of Philosophy, 107(8): 432–443. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2010107835
- Goswick, D. 2015. Why Being Necessary Really Isn’t the Same As Being Not Possibly Not. ActaAnalytica, 30(3): 267–274.
- Goswick, D. 2018a. Ordinary Objects are Nonmodal Objects. Analysis and Metaphysics, 17: 22–37.
- Goswick, D. 2018b.
A New Route To Avoiding Primitive Modal Facts . In: Brute Facts, Vintiadis, E (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Hale, B. 2002. The Source of Necessity. Nous, 36: 299–319. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.11
- Heller, M. 1990. The Ontology of Physical Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Humberstone, L. 1991. Review of Languages of Possibility by Graeme Forbes. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56(1): 351–352. DOI: 10.2307/2274941
- Hupakka, J, Keinanen, M and Korhonen, A. 1999. A Combinatorial Theory of Modality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77(4): 483–497.
- Jackson, F and Pettit, P. 2002. Response-Dependence Without Tears. Philosophical Issues, 12: 97–117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-2237.2002.tb00063.x
- Johnston, M. 1992. How to Speak of Colors. Philosophical Studies, 68(3): 221–263. DOI: 10.1007/BF00694847
- Johnston, M. 1997. Manifest Kinds. Journal of Philosophy, 94(11): 564–583. DOI: 10.2307/2564589
- Johnston, M. 2002. Parts and Principles. Philosophical Topics, 30(1): 129–166. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics20023017
- Johnston, M. 2006. Hylomorphism. The Journal of Philosophy, 103: 652–698. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2006103125
- Jubien, M. 1993. Ontology, Modality, and the Fallacy of Reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jubien, M. 2001. Thinking about Things. Philosophical Perspectives, 15: 1–15. DOI: 10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.1
- Koslicki, K. 2006. Aristotle’s Mereology and the Status of Forms. Journal of Philosophy, 103(12): 715–736. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2006103127
- Koslicki, K. 2007. Towards a Neo-Aristotelian Mereology. Dialectica, 61(1): 127–159. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2006.01075.x
- Koslicki, K. 2008. Natural Kinds and Natural Kind Terms. Philosophy Compass, 3: 789–802. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00157.x
- Koslicki, K. 2008. The Structure of Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539895.001.0001
- Koslicki, K. 2012.
Essence, Necessity, and Explanation . In: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, Tahko, TE (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Koslicki, K. 2014. The Causal Priority of Form in Aristotle. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 7(2): 113–141. DOI: 10.12697/spe.2014.7.2.07
- Koslicki, K. 2015. The Coarse-Grainedness of Grounding. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 9: 306–344. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198729242.003.0011
- Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9
- Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Mackie, P. 2006. How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199272204.001.0001
- Paul, L. 2004. The Context of Essence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82: 170–184. DOI: 10.1080/713659794
- Paul, L. 2006. In Defense of Essentialism. Philosophical Perspectives, 20: 333–372. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00110.x
- Pettit, P. 1991. Realism & Response-Dependence. Mind, 100(4): 587–626.
- Quine, W. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Quine, W. 1966.
Three Grades of Modal Involvement . In: Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. New York: Random House. - Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. USA: Free Press.
- Sidelle, A. 1989. Necessity, Essence, and Individuation. London: Cornell University Press.
- Sidelle, A. 2014. Does Hylomorphism Offer a Distinctive Solution to the Grounding Problem? Analysis, 74(3): 397–404. DOI: 10.1093/analys/anu034
- Sidelle, A. 2016. Coincidence: The Grounding Problem, Object-Specifying Principles, and Some Consequences. Philosophical Papers, 45(3): 497–528. DOI: 10.1080/05568641.2016.1245842
- Sider, T. 2003.
Reductive Theories of Modality . In: The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, Loux, MJ and Zimmerman, D (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001
- Thomasson, A. 2003. Realism and Human Kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3): 580–609. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00309.x
- Thomasson, A. 2007. Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319910.001.0001
- Wiggins, D. 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612756