References
- 1Bahník, Š. (2021a). Anchoring does not activate examples associated with the anchor value. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/4j5wb
- 2Bahník, Š. (2021b). Anchoring without scale distortion. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(1), 131. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/2q8hj
- 3Bergman, O., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., & Svensson, C. (2010). Anchoring and cognitive ability. Economics Letters, 107(1), 66–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.12.028
- 4Berthet, V. (2021). The Measurement of Individual Differences in Cognitive Biases: A Review and Improvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630177. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630177
- 5Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., Grange, J. A., Perugini, M., Spies, J. R., & van ‘t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
- 6Bystranowski, P., Janik, B., Próchnicki, M., & Skórska, P. (2021). Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 1–23. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000438
- 7Cheek, N. N., & Norem, J. K. (2019). Are Big Five Traits and Facets Associated With Anchoring Susceptibility? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 92, 194855061983700. DOI: 10.1177/1948550619837001
- 8Cheek, N. N., & Norem, J. K. (2022). Individual differences in anchoring susceptibility: Verbal reasoning, autistic tendencies, and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111212. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111212
- 9Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188–200. DOI: 10.1177/0146167205282152
- 10Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17(4), 311–318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x
- 11Harris, A. J. L., Blower, F. B. N., Rodgers, S. A., Lagator, S., Page, E., Burton, A., Urlichich, D., & Speekenbrink, M. (2019). Failures to replicate a key result of the selective accessibility theory of anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000644
- 12Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- 13Kahneman, D. (2012).
Thinking, fast and slow . Penguin Books. - 14Li, L., Maniadis, Z., & Sedikides, C. (2021). Anchoring in Economics: A Meta-Analysis of Studies on Willingness-To-Pay and Willingness-To-Accept. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101629. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101629
- 15Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84–97. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-X
- 16Orr, D., & Guthrie, C. (2006). Anchoring, information, expertise, and negotiation: New insights from meta-analysis. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 21(3), 597–628.
- 17Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2018). Psychological Science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive behavioural measurements. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6ka9z
- 18R Core Team. (2018). R [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/ - 19Röseler, L. (2021). Anchoring Effects: Resolving the Contradictions of Personality Moderator Research. University of Bamberg. DOI: 10.20378/irb-49951
- 20Röseler, L., & Schütz, A. (2022). Hanging the Anchor Off a New Ship: A Meta-Analysis of Anchoring Effects. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/wf2tn
- 21Röseler, L., Schütz, A., Baumeister, R. F., & Starker, U. (2020). Does ego depletion reduce judgment adjustment for both internally and externally generated anchors? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 103942. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103942
- 22Röseler, L., Schütz, A., Blank, P. A., Dück, M., Fels, S., Kupfer, J., Scheelje, L., & Seida, C. (2021). Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104066. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104066
- 23Röseler, L., Weber, L., Stich, E., Helgerth, K., Günther, M., Wagner, F.-S., & Schütz, A. (2022). Measurements of Susceptibility to Anchoring are Unreliable: Meta-Analytic Evidence From More Than 50,000 Anchored Estimates. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/b6t35
- 24Schindler, S., Querengässer, J., Bruchmann, M., Bögemann, N. J., Moeck, R., & Straube, T. (2021). Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 7021. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86429-2
- 25Shanks, D. R., Barbieri-Hermitte, P., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). Do Incidental Environmental Anchors Bias Consumers’ Price Estimations? Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 19. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.310
- 26Townson, C. D. (2019). The anchoring effect: A meta-analysis [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
- 27Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- 28van ‘t Veer, A. E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016). Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 2–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.004
- 29Weber, L., & Röseler, L. (2022, August 11). Testing the Reliability of Anchoring Susceptibility Scores. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/2kfh3