References
- Barnett, M. D., Öz, H. C., & Marsden, A. D. (2018). Economic and social political ideology and homophobia: The mediating role of binding and individualizing moral foundations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1183–1194. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-017-0989-2
- Brandt, M. J. (2017). Predicting ideological prejudice. Psychological Science, 28(6), 713–722. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617693004
- Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), 9314–9319. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218453110
- Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167–208. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12407
- Kubin, E., & Brandt, M. J. (2020). Identifying the domains of ideological similarities and differences in attitudes. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 4, 53–77. DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2020.1756242
- Hussey, I., Hughes, S., Lai, C. K., Ebersole, C. R., Axt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2018). The Attitudes, Identities, & Individual Differences (AIID) Study: a massive, online, planned missing data study for attitude and identity research. URL:
https://osf.io/pcjwf/ - Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. DOI: 10.1037/a0021847
- Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
- Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samate, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
- Bradley, P. (2018). Bots and data quality on crowdsourcing platforms. Retrieved on May 15, 2019, from
https://blog.prolific.ac/bots-and-data-quality-on-crowdsourcing-platforms/ .