Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data from the Researcher Mental Health Observatory STAIRCASE Survey Cover

Data from the Researcher Mental Health Observatory STAIRCASE Survey

By: ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Number of responses per country with at least 24 respondents.

COUNTRYN RESPONSES% OF RESEARCH POPULATION SAMPLED% FEMALE RESPONSES% FEMALE IN RESEARCH POPULATION
Albania4811.2679.244.3
Austria500.0858.031.3
Belgium880.1170.533.5
Switzerland7411.3865.037.5
Czech Republic800.1656.327.7
Germany1610.0354.029.4
Spain3050.1961.641.6
Finland1000.2258.033.6
France5850.1654.229.7
Great Britain320.0165.638.7
Greece1160.2355.240.1
Hungary560.1364.928.8
ireland510.1778.437.4
Italy1680.1053.636.4
Latvia691.6268.150.7
North Macedonia30418.0365.854.3
Malta433.2074.435.7
Montenegro9319.7463.452.1
The Netherlands630.0669.830.2
Portugal1370.2373.742.1
Romania1030.5468.046.1
Serbia270.1666.753.5
Slovakia1200.6564.240.0
Slovenia2101.8462.435.0
Sweden330.0469.734.6
Turkey1020.0570.637.3

[i] Note: For countries with >24 responses, the number of responses is divided by the total number of researchers in each country based on the latest UNESCO indicator “Researchers per million inhabitants (FTE)”1 available for the country to calculate the percentage of researchers in the country that responded to the survey. The column “% female responses” is the number of responses from respondents who reported to be female divided by the total number of responses from that country. The column “% female in research population” is the percentage of female researchers in each country based on the latest UNESCO indicator “Researchers (HC) – % Female”2 available for the country.

Table 2

Variables in the “Demographics” section of the survey.

VARIABLE CONTENTVARIABLE LABEL% MISSINGCUF PROCESSING
Participant IDparticipant_id0.0Deleted and newly randomised.
Primary positionprimary_position6.3Merged R3 “established researcher” and R4 “leading researcher” categories.
Gendergender6.9“non binary” set to NA
Ageage5.4Calculated age from year of birth. Summarised into <31 years, 31–42 years, >42 years.
Nationalitynationality12.2Deleted
Nationality regionnationality_region6.9Deleted
Nationality continentnationality_continent5.8Deleted
Place of work countrycountry_of_work9.0Deleted
Place of work regioncountry_of_work_region5.4Deleted
Place of work continentcountry_of_work_continent5.4Derived from country_of_work_region using UN region coding. Summarised into “europe” and “outside europe”
Research fieldresearch_field6.4Mapped free-text answers to existing categories. Summarised into “Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics”, “Engineering and Information Science; Environment or Geo-Science”, “Social and Human Sciences; Economics”
Research field – subfieldNANADeleted
Civil statuscivil_status7.9Mapped free-text answers to existing categories. Summarised into “in a relationship/married” and “single”.
Partner workpartner_work32.4Deleted
Babies in householdbabies_in_household7.2Derived from a question asking for the number of babies by mapping 0 to “no” and numbers >0 to “yes”.
Children in householdchildren_in_household7.0Derived from a question asking for the number of children by mapping 0 to “no” and numbers >0 to “yes”.
Adolescents in householdadolescents_in_household7.1Derived from a question asking for the number of adolescents by mapping 0 to “no” and numbers >0 to “yes”.
Young adults in householdyoung_adults_in_household7.0Derived from a question asking for the number of young adults by mapping 0 to “no” and numbers >0 to “yes”.
Incomeincome5.7
Time since PhD degreeyears_since_phd_completion50.3Calculated age from year of PhD completion. Summarised into 1–15 years and >15 years.

[i] Note: Variable content, variable label in the data set, number of missing responses – e.g. where respondents chose “I prefer not to say” or “Does not apply” (for the “Time since PhD degree” question), chose to terminate the survey before reaching the given question, or were not shown a question because of a filter (for the “Partner work” question) –, and processing steps for the CUF data file for variables in the “Demographics” section of the survey.

Table 3

Variables in the “Mental health outcomes” section of the survey.

VARIABLE CONTENTVARIABLE LABEL% MISSINGRESPONSE SCALERESPONSE SCALE NUMERIC
Work-engagement item 1UWES_113.3Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Very often, Always1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Work-engagement item 2UWES_213.3see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Work-engagement item 3UWES_313.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Burnout item 1BAT_113.3Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 2BAT_213.3see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 3BAT_313.3see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 4BAT_413.4see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 5BAT_514.0see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 6BAT_614.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 7BAT_713.4see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 8BAT_813.4see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 9BAT_913.4see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 10BAT_1013.9see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 11BAT_1113.5see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Burnout item 12BAT_1213.4see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Resilience item 1BRS_114.1Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly agree1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Resilience item 2BRS_213.7see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Resilience item 3BRS_313.6see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Resilience item 4BRS_414.1see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Resilience item 5BRS_513.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Resilience item 6BRS_614.2see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Stress and anxiety item 1DASS_115.3Did not apply to me at all, Applied to me to some degree, Applied to me to a considerable degree, or a good part of the time, Applied to me very much or most of the time0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 2DASS_215.0see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 3DASS_314.4see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 4DASS_414.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 5DASS_514.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 6DASS_614.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 7DASS_714.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 8DASS_814.3see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 9DASS_914.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 10DASS_1014.3see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 11DASS_1114.6see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 12DASS_1214.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 13DASS_1314.5see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 14DASS_1415.6see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 15DASS_1514.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 16DASS_1614.2see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 17DASS_1714.4see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 18DASS_1815.0see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 19DASS_1914.6see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 20DASS_2014.3see above0, 1, 2, 3
Stress and anxiety item 21DASS_2114.6see above0, 1, 2, 3
Well-being item 1WHO-5_113.9All of the time, Most of the time, More than half of the time, Less than half of the time, Some of the time, At no time5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0
Well-being item 2WHO-5_213.8see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0
Well-being item 3WHO-5_313.9see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0
Well-being item 4WHO-5_413.9see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0
Well-being item 5WHO-5_514.0see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0

[i] Note: Variable content, variable label in the data set, number of missing responses – e.g. where respondents chose “I prefer not to say” or chose to terminate the survey before reaching the given question –, answer options on scales, and numerical mapping of the answer options in the data files for variables in the “Mental health outcomes” section (e.g. outcomes) of the survey.

Table 4

Variables in the “Working- and studying conditions” section of the survey.

VARIABLE CONTENTVARIABLE LABEL% MISSINGCUF PROCESSING
Main place of workmain_place_of_work_hashed33.9Deleted
Additional places of workother_work17.9
Contract durationcontract_duration20.6The original question provided the answer option “I have a tenure-track position” that was non-exclusive with answer options “Within the next 12 months”, “In 1–2 years” “In 2–3 years”, and “In more than 3 years”. This answer was transformed into a separate column. The remaining answers were summarised into “permanent position” and “termed contract/no contract/stipend”.
Tenure tracktenure_track1.9Created by mapping the response “I have a tenure track position” from the contract duration question (see above) to “yes” and all other responses to “no”.
Overworkworking_hours_overtime39.6Created by subtracting the answer to the question “How many working hours per week are specified in your contract or funding for your main place of work?” from the answer to the question “How many hours per week do you actually work (on average)?”
Time spent on teachingpercent_teaching45.3Deleted
Time spent on researchpercent_research18.0Deleted
Time spent on applying for research fundingpercent_funding54.6Deleted
Time spent on mentoringpercent_mentoring46.7Deleted
Time spent on administrative taskspercent_admin27.1Deleted
Time spent on other taskspercent_other51.6Deleted
Research outputresearch_output0.0The original question asked for the number of research outputs in the categories “Peer reviewed journal article”, “Peer reviewed conference article”, “Monograph”, “Patent” and “Other”. The variable was created by adding the numbers provided for each of the five output subcategories. Not providing a number defaulted to 0, there was no “I prefer not to say” answer option. The number was then summarised into 0, 1–5 and >5.
Professional developmentdays_professional_development18.7
Leaving academialeaving_academia18.3
Recommending academiarecommend_academia18.3

[i] Note: Variable content, variable label in the data set, number of missing responses – e.g. where respondents chose “I prefer not to say”, chose to terminate the survey before reaching the given question, or did not enter a number (the “Time spent on task” questions) –, and processing steps for the CUF data file for variables in the “Working- and studying conditions” section of the survey.

Table 5

Variables in the “Working- and studying environment” section of the survey.

VARIABLE CONTENTVARIABLE LABEL% MISSINGRESPONSE SCALERESPONSE SCALE NUMERIC
Predictability item 1COPSOQ_predictability_123.9To a very large extent, To a large extent, To some extent, To a little extent, To a very little extent100, 75, 50, 25, 0
Predictability item 2COPSOQ_predictability_223.6see above100, 75, 50, 25, 0
Predictability item 3COPSOQ_predictability_324.1see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Role clarity item 1role_clarity_125.2To a very large extent, To a large extent, To some extent, To a little extent, To a very little extent100, 75, 50, 25, 0
Role clarity item 2role_clarity_223.6see above100, 75, 50, 25, 0
Role clarity item 3role_clarity_323.6see above100, 75, 50, 25, 0
Role clarity item 4role_clarity_423.5see above100, 75, 50, 25, 0
Sense of community item 1COPSOQ_sense_of_community_123.9Hardly ever/almost never, Seldom, Sometimes, Often, Extremely often/always0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Sense of community item 2COPSOQ_sense_of_community_223.9see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Sense of community item 3COPSOQ_sense_of_community_324.0see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Emotional support item 1COPSOQ_emotional_support_132.0Hardly ever/almost never, Seldom, Sometimes, Often, Extremely often/always0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Emotional support item 2COPSOQ_emotional_support_236.1see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Emotional support item 3COPSOQ_emotional_support_326.0see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Emotional support item 4COPSOQ_emotional_support_437.5see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Emotional support item 5COPSOQ_emotional_support_525.4see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Instrumental support item 1COPSOQ_instrumental_support_124.9Hardly ever/almost never, Seldom, Sometimes, Often, Extremely often/always0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Instrumental support item 2COPSOQ_instrumental_support_225.6see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Instrumental support item 3COPSOQ_instrumental_support_324.3see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Instrumental support item 4COPSOQ_instrumental_support_425.3see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Instrumental support item 5COPSOQ_instrumental_support_524.3see above0, 25, 50, 75, 100
Policy perceptions item 1policy_perceptions_127.2To a very large extent, To a large extent, To some extent, To a little extent, To a very little extent5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Policy perceptions item 2policy_perceptions_228.5see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Policy perceptions item 3policy_perceptions_327.0see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Policy perceptions item 4policy_perceptions_429.4see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Policy perceptions item 5policy_perceptions_542.3see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Policy perceptions item 6policy_perceptions_642.5see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Policy perceptions item 7policy_perceptions_729.0see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Job insecurity item 1job_insecurity_125.6Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully agree5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Job insecurity item 2job_insecurity_225.7see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Job insecurity item 3job_insecurity_325.0see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Job insecurity item 4job_insecurity_426.1see above5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Job control item 1job_control_123.8Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully agree1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Job control item 2job_control_223.7see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Job control item 3job_control_323.6see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Interpersonal conflict item 1interpersonal_conflict_125.1Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully agree1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Interpersonal conflict item 2interpersonal_conflict_225.4see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Interpersonal conflict item 3interpersonal_conflict_324.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-family reconciliation item 1work_family_recon_124.0Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully agree1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-family reconciliation item 2work_family_recon_225.0see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-family reconciliation item 3work_family_recon_324.1see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-family reconciliation item 4work_family_recon_425.2see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-family reconciliation item 5work_family_recon_524.6see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Illegitimate tasks item 1illegitimate_tasks_124.2Hardly ever/almost never, Seldom, Sometimes, Often, Extremely often/always1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Illegitimate tasks item 2illegitimate_tasks_224.7see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Illegitimate tasks item 3illegitimate_tasks_324.5see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Illegitimate tasks item 4illegitimate_tasks_424.6see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-related stress item 1work_related_stress_124.1Hardly ever/almost never, Seldom, Sometimes, Often, Extremely often/always1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-related stress item 2work_related_stress_223.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Work-related stress item 3work_related_stress_324.1see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Job satisfaction item 1job_satisfaction23.80, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 100, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

[i] Note: Variable content, variable label in the data set, number of missing responses – e.g. where respondents chose “I prefer not to say” or chose to terminate the survey before reaching the given question –, answer options on scales, and numerical mapping of the answer options in the data files for variables in the “Working- and studying environment” section of the survey.

Table 6

Variables in the “Working- and studying environment – harassment” subsection of the survey.

VARIABLE CONTENTVARIABLE LABEL% MISSINGCUF PROCESSING
Perceived harassmentharassment_perceived28.2
Perpetrator of perceived harassment supervisorharassment_perceived_perp_supervisor0.0Derived from a question about the perpetrator of perceived harassment that allowed for selecting more than one answer option. “I prefer not to say” was coded as a separate category and not mapped to NA.The variable is set to “True” if the supervisor was selected and to “False” if the supervisor was not selected.
Perpetrator of perceived harassment coworkerharassment_perceived_perp_coworker0.0… if a coworker was selected.
Perpetrator of perceived harassment administrative personnelharassment_perceived_perp_administration0.0… if administrative personnel was reported. Analysis of the free-text answers to this question yielded a high number of answers indicating administrative personnel as perpetrators in perceived harassment, warranting the creation of the category that was coded from the free-text answers.
Perpetrator of perceived harassment studentharassment_perceived_perp_student0.0… if a student was selected. Analysis of the free-text answers to this question yielded a high number of answers indicating students as perpetrators in perceived harassment, warranting the creation of the category that was coded from the free-text answers.
Perpetrator of perceived harassment prefer not to sayharassment_perceived_perp_pns0.0… if “I prefer not to say” was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment genderharassment_perceived_reason_gender0.0Derived from a question about the reason for the perceived harassment that allowed for selecting more than one answer option. The variable is set to “True” if gender was selected and to “False” if gender was not selected.
Reason of perceived harassment sexual orientationharassment_perceived_reason_sexorient0.0… if sexual orientation was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment religionharassment_perceived_reason_religion0.0… if religion was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment ethnicityharassment_perceived_reason_ethnicity0.0… if ethnicity was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment cultureharassment_perceived_reason_culture0.0… if culture was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment hierarchyharassment_perceived_reason_hierarchiy0.0… if hierarchy was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment ageharassment_perceived_reason_age0.0… if age was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment disabilityharassment_perceived_reason_disability0.0… if disability was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment otherharassment_perceived_reason_other96.5The variable contains the anonymised free-text answers that respondents were asked to provide if “other” was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment don’t knowharassment_perceived_reason_idk0.0… if “I don’t know” was selected.
Reason of perceived harassment prefer not to sayharassment_perceived_reason_pns0.0… if “I prefer not to say” was selected.
Experienced harassmentharassment_experienced26.8
Perpetrator of experienced harassment supervisorharassment_experienced_perp_supervisor0.0Derived from a question about the perpetrator of experienced harassment that allowed for selecting more than one answer option. “I prefer not to say” was coded as a separate category and not mapped to NA. The variable is set to “True” if the supervisor was selected and to “False” if the supervisor was not selected.
Perpetrator of experienced harassment coworkerharassment_experienced_perp_coworker0.0… if a coworker was selected.
Perpetrator of experienced harassment administrative personnelharassment_experienced_perp_administration0.0… if administrative personnel was selected.
Perpetrator of experienced harassment studentharassment_experienced_perp_student0.0… if a student was selected.
Perpetrator of experienced harassment prefer not to sayharassment_experienced_perp_pns0.0… if “I prefer not to say” was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment genderharassment_experienced_reason_gender0.0Derived from a question about the reason for the experienced harassment that allowed for selecting more than one answer option. The variable is set to “True” if gender was selected and to “False” if gender was not selected.
Reason of experienced harassment sexual orientationharassment_experienced_reason_sexorient0.0… if sexual orientation was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment religionharassment_experienced_reason_religion0.0… if religion was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment ethnicityharassment_experienced_reason_ethnicity0.0… if ethnicity was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment cultureharassment_experienced_reason_culture0.0… if culture was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment hierarchyharassment_experienced_reason_hierarchiy0.0… if hierarchy was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment ageharassment_experienced_reason_age0.0… if age was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment disabilityharassment_experienced_reason_disability0.0… if disability was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment otherharassment_experienced_reason_other97.5The variable contains the anonymised free-text answers that respondents were asked to provide if “other” was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment don’t knowharassment_experienced_reason_idk0.0… if “I don’t know” was selected.
Reason of experienced harassment prefer not to sayharassment_experienced_reason_pns0.0… if “I prefer not to say” was selected.

[i] Note: Variable content, variable label in the data set, number of missing responses – e.g. where respondents chose “I prefer not to say” or chose to terminate the survey before reaching the given question –, and processing steps for the CUF data file for variables in the “Working- and studying environment – harassment” subsection of the survey.

Table 7

Variables in the “Leadership and supervision” section of the survey.

VARIABLE CONTENTVARIABLE LABEL% MISSINGRESPONSE SCALERESPONSE SCALE NUMERIC
Leader demands item 1leader_demands_133.1Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully Agree, Does not apply1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader demands item 2leader_demands_233.3see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader demands item 3leader_demands_333.1see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader demands item 4leader_demands_433.5see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader demands item 5leader_demands_533.5see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader demands item 6leader_demands_633.3see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader lack of care item 1leader_lack_of_care_130.7Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully Agree, Does not apply1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader lack of care item 2leader_lack_of_care_230.6see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader lack of care item 3leader_lack_of_care_331.6see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Leader lack of care item 4leader_lack_of_care_430.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NA
Supervisor existssupervisor_exists27.5Yes, NoTrue, False
Supervisor integrity item 1supervisor_integrity_150.3Fully disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither disagree/nor agree, Somewhat agree, Fully Agree1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Supervisor integrity item 2supervisor_integrity_250.0see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Supervisor integrity item 3supervisor_integrity_350.2see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Supervisor integrity item 4supervisor_integrity_450.8see above1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Number of meetings with supervisorn_meetings_supervisor51.8Hardly ever/Never, Seldom, Sometimes, Often, Extremely often/Alwaysno mapping

[i] Note: Variable content, variable label in the data set, number of missing responses – e.g. where respondents chose “I prefer not to say” or “Does not apply” (e.g., leader demands and leader lack of care scales), chose to terminate the survey before reaching the given question, or were not shown a question because of a filter (e.g., supervisor integrity scale and number of meetings with supervisor) –, answer options on scales, and numerical mapping of the answer options in the data files for variables in the “Leadership and supervision” section of the survey.

Figure 1

Distribution of respondent age (panel A) and time since PhD completion (panel B).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.136 | Journal eISSN: 2050-9863
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 30, 2026
Published on: May 29, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Jana Lasser, Stefan T. Mol, Alja Čontala, Ana Slavec, Andreja Zulim de Swarte, Anna Khachatryan, Anna Maria Eleuteri, Anupoma Haque, Baiba Jansone, Blerina Vrenozi, Brian Cahill, Carlos Trenado, Christiane Schwieren, Claudia Iuliana Iacob, Claudia Tejada-Gallardo, Cornelia Mairean, Darragh McCashin, Deborah Chery, Dilara Özel, Dimity Stephen, Dragan Mijakoski, Elena Ronda, Eleonora Ricci, Eliana Ibrahimi, Emese Vita, Fatjona Kamberi, Fernando G. Benavides, Francisco Valente Gonçalves, Gábor Kismihók, Gemma Pascual Manich, Igor Esnaola, Igor Portoghese, Inge van der Weijden, Irina Guseva Canu, Irsida Mehmeti, Ivana B. Petrovic, Jakub Šindelář, João Miguel Alves Ferreira, Jonila Gabrani, Karolina Eszter Kovács, Katri Pöllänen, Konstantinos Geles, Lamis Yahia Mohamed Elkheir, Lorena Cudris-Torres, Lise T. Løvseth, Louiza Ioannidou, Luksa Popovic, Mais M. Aljunaidy, Maria Fatjó Saboya, Marit Christensen, Marlene Santos, Marta Miklikowska, Mateja Erce Paoli, Mathias Schroijen, Mathieu Fusi, Mayya Sundukova, Mete Kurtoğlu, Milica Vukelić, Mirela Adriana Anghelache, Mohamad Nadim Adi, Mümine Barkçin, Nuno Barbosa Rocha, Nurka Pranjic, Olga Bogolyubova, Paulo Alexandre Soares Moreira, Paulo Moreira, Pil Maria Saugmann, Rivka Tuval-Mashiach, Rui Amaral Mendes, Sabina Osmanovic, Sinem Ozdede, Simone Lackner, Stéphanie Gauttier, Szidónia Rusu, Theodota Lagouri, Ümran Yüce-Selvi, Urszula Ziemiańczyk, Xhilda Dhamo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.