Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The CONLIT Dataset of Contemporary Literature Cover

The CONLIT Dataset of Contemporary Literature

By: Andrew Piper  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. 1Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. R. (2003). Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text & Talk, 23(3), 321346. DOI: 10.1515/text.2003.014
  2. 2Bamman, D. (2022). BookNLP. Retrieved from: https://github.com/booknlp/booknlp (last accessed: June 2022).
  3. 3Bourrier, K., & Thelwall, M. (2020). The social lives of books: Reading Victorian literature on Goodreads. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 5(1), 134. DOI: 10.22148/001c.12049
  4. 4Castellano, C. G. (2018). The institution of institutionalism: Difference, universalism and the legacies of Institutional Critique. Culture, Theory and Critique, 59(1), 5973. DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2017.1410438
  5. 5Cohen, R. (1986). History and genre. New Literary History, 17(2), 203218. DOI: 10.2307/468885
  6. 6Mendelman, L., & Mukamal, A. (2021). The generative dissensus of reading the feminist novel, 1995-2020: A computational analysis of interpretive communities. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 6(3), 3173. DOI: 10.22148/001c.30009
  7. 7Pianzola, F., Rebora, S., & Lauer, G. (2020). Wattpad as a resource for literary studies: Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers’ comments in the margins. PloS one, 15(1), e0226708.
  8. 8Sharma, A., Hu, Y., Wu, P., Shang, W., Singhal, S., & Underwood, T. (2020). The Rise and Fall of Genre Differentiation in English-Language Fiction. CHR 2020: Workshop on Computational Humanities Research.
  9. 9Toubia, O., Berger, J., & Eliashberg, J. (2021). How quantifying the shape of stories predicts their success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), e2011695118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226708
  10. 10Underwood, T. (2016a). Genre theory and historicism. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2(2), 16. DOI: 10.22148/16.008
  11. 11Underwood, T. (2016b). The life cycles of genres. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2(2), 125. DOI: 10.22148/16.005
  12. 12Walsh, M., & Antoniak, M. (2021). The Goodreads ‘classics’: A computational study of readers, Amazon, and crowdsourced amateur criticism. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 6(2), 243287. DOI: 10.22148/001c.22221
  13. 13Wilkens, M. (2016). Genre, computation, and the varieties of twentieth-century U.S. fiction. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2(2), 124. DOI: 10.22148/16.009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.88 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Published on: Oct 11, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Andrew Piper, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.