References
- 1Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024312321077
- 2van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A. (1998). Modality’s Semantic Map. Linguistic Typology 2(1), 79–124. DOI: 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
- 3Bermúdez Sabel, H., Dell’Oro, F., & Marongiu, P. (2020, July 22–24).
Visualisation of semantic shifts: the case of modal markers [Poster session] . DH2020, Ottawa, Canada. DOI: 10.17613/scy4-br70 - 4Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 5Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
- 6Dell’Oro, F. (2019).
WoPoss guidelines for annotation . Université de Lausanne. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3560951 - 7Dell’Oro, F. (2020, July 22–24). WoPoss – A World of Possibilities. An open access annotated corpus to study the diachrony of modality in the Latin language [Conference presentation]. DH2020, Ottawa, Canada. DOI: 10.17613/pp6j-0p86
- 8Dell’Oro, F., Bermúdez Sabel, H., & Marongiu, P. (2020, December 5–6). Implemented to be shared: the WoPoss annotation of semantic modality in a Latin diachronic corpus [Conference paper]. Sharing the Experience: Workflows for the Digital Humanities. Proceedings of the DARIAH-CH Workshop 2019. Neuchâtel, Switzerland. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3739440
- 9Dell’Oro, F., Bermúdez Sabel, H., & Marongiu, P. (forthcoming).
Pygmalion in the classroom: a tool to draw lexicographic diachronic maps and their application to didactics . In M. Márquez Cruz & V. Ferreira Martins (Eds.), La Lexicografía didáctica: recursos para el aprendizaje de lenguas. Madrid: Guillermo Escolar Editor. - 10Ernout, A., & Meillet, A. (2001). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots (reprint of the 4th ed. with additions and corrections by Jacques André). Paris: Klincksieck.
- 11Georgakopoulos, A., & Polis, S. (2021). Lexical Diachronic Semantic Maps. Mapping the evolution of time-related lexemes. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 11(3), 367–420. DOI: 10.1075/jhl.19018.geo
- 12Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. New Psychology of Language, 2, 211–242. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.831410
- 13Jessop, M. (2008). Digital Visualization as a Scholarly Activity. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3), 281–93. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqn016
- 14Klerkx, J., Verbert, K., & Duval, E. (2014).
Enhancing Learning with Visualization Techniques . In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, (pp. 791–807). New York, NY: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_64 - 15Magni, E. (2005). Modality’s Semantic Maps. An Investigation of Some Latin Modal Forms. Journal of Latin Linguistics, 9(1), 325–336. DOI: 10.1515/joll.2005.9.1.325
- 16Magni, E. (2010).
Mood and Modality . In P. Baldi & P. Cuzzolin (Eds.), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense, 2, (pp. 193–275). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110215458.193 - 17Meiser, G. (1998). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
- 18Meyer-Lübke, W. (1935). Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: C. Winter.
- 19Núñez, S. (1991). Semántica de la modalidad en latín. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
- 20Nuyts, J. (2016).
Analyses of the Modal Meanings . In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.1 - 21OLD = Glare, P. G. W. (Ed.) (1968). Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.
- 22Pygmalion. (2020a). Dell’Oro, F., Rimaz, L., Bermúdez Sabel, H., & Marongiu, P. (2020a). Pygmalion-simple 1.0. A tool to draw interactive and diachronic semantic maps. WoPoss. A World of Possibilities. Swiss National Science Foundation.
- 23Pygmalion. (2020b). Dell’Oro, F., Rimaz, L., Bermúdez Sabel, H., & Marongiu, P. (2020b). Pygmalion-modal 1.0. A tool to draw interactive and diachronic semantic maps of modality. WoPoss. A World of Possibilities. Swiss National Science Foundation.
- 24Pygmalion. (2021). Dell’Oro, F., Rimaz, L., Bermúdez Sabel, H., & Marongiu, P. (2021). Pygmalion-colour 1.0. A tool to draw interactive and diachronic semantic maps of modality. WoPoss. A World of Possibilities. Swiss National Science Foundation.
- 25Rattya, K. (2013). Languaging and Visualisation Method for Grammar Teaching: A Conceptual Change Theory Perspective. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(3), 87–101.
- 26Rouse, W. H. D., & Smith, M. F. (Eds.). (1924). Lucretius. On the Nature of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- 27ThLL = Thesaurusbüro München Internationale Thesaurus-Kommission (Ed.) (1900–). Thesaurus Linguae Latinae. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- 28de Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin. Leiden: Brill.
- 29Walde, A., & Hoffmann, J. B. (1938–1956). Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (3rd ed., 3 vols.). Heidelberg: C. Winter.