Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Pilot Corpus Study on Microdiachronic Complexity Features in Brazilian Labor Law Cover

A Pilot Corpus Study on Microdiachronic Complexity Features in Brazilian Labor Law

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Adler, M. (2012). The plain language movement. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 6783). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006
  2. Almut, K. (2010). Building small, specialised corpora. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 6679). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949-6
  3. Aluísio, S., & Gasperin, C. (2010). Fostering Digital Inclusion and Accessibility: The PorSimples project for Simplification of Portuguese Texts. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Young Investigators Workshop on Computational Approaches to Languages of the Americas, pp. 4653, Los Angeles, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Barbera, M., & Onesti, C. (2009). Scheda Progetto di ricerca n. 9. Corpus Jus Jurium. In P. Diadori (Ed.), Progetto JURA: la formazione dei docenti di lingua e traduzione in ambito giuridico italo (pp. 349351). Guerra Edizioni.
  5. Benson, R. (1985). The end of legalese: The game is over. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 13(3), 519573.
  6. Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, Oxford, 8(4), 243257. 10.1093/llc/8.4.243
  7. Biel, Ł. (2009). Corpus-based studies of legal language for translation purposes: Methodological and practical potential. Online proceedings of the XVII European LSP Symposium.
  8. Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
  9. Busso, L. (2022a). Lexicon and grammar in legal-lay language: A quantitative corpus study on Italian. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata (SILTA), LI(1), 533.
  10. Busso, L. (2022b). An investigation of the lexico-grammatical profile of English legal-lay language. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 9(1), 146184. 10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/9_1a7
  11. Carapinha, C. (2018). A linguagem jurídica: Contributos para uma caracterização dos Códigos Legais. REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 7. Retrieved from https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6200.
  12. Carvalho, L. (2006). Os dicionários jurídicos bilíngües e o tradutor – dois binômios em Direito Contratual. TradTerm, 12, 309347. 10.11606/issn.2317-9511.tradterm.2006.46903
  13. Carvalho, L. (2014). Inglês jurídico: Tradução e terminologia. Lexema.
  14. Casa Civil da Presidência da República. (2018). Manual de redação da Presidência da República (3rd ed.), Presidência da República. Retrieved from https://www.gov.br/planalto/pt-br/conheca-a-presidencia/presidencia/acervo/manual-de-redacao-da-presidencia-da-republica.
  15. Castilho, A. T. de. (2010). Nova gramática do Português Brasileiro. Editora Contexto.
  16. Chovanec, J. (2013). Grammar in the law. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 18). Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0482
  17. Fanego, T., & Rodríguez-Puente, P. (Eds.) (2019). Corpus-based research on variation in English legal discourse (Vol. 91). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.91
  18. Ferrari, L. A., & Cunha, E. L. T. P. (2022). Reflexões metodológicas sobre datasets e linguística de corpus: Uma análise preliminar de dados legislativos. Domínios de Lingu@gem, 16(4), 15711607. Retrieved from https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/64146.
  19. Ferrari, L. A., Araujo, N., Oliveira, L. R., & Marques, C. G. F. (2026). Uma análise preliminar da microdiacronia nos códigos brasileiros: o Código de Águas e o Código do Consumidor. Caligrama: Revista de Estudos Românicos, 30, 7295.
  20. Ferrari, L. A., & Marques, C. G. de F. (2022). O LEX-BR-Ius: Arquitetura e decisões na compilação de um corpus representativo das leis federais brasileiras. ANTARES, 14(34), 4077. Retrieved from https://www.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/antares/article/view/11150/5328.
  21. Garner, B. A. (2013). Legal writing in plain English: A text with exercises. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226031392.001.0001
  22. Giampieri, P. (2018). Online parallel and comparable corpora for legal translations. Altre Modernità, 20, 237252.
  23. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2011). Patterns of linguistic variation in American legal English: A corpus-based study. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9
  24. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2012). Legal language. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 32813287). John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2021). Corpus linguistics in legal discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34, 15151540. 10.1007/s11196-021-09860-8
  26. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S., & Pontrandolfo, G. (2014). Facing the facts: Evaluative patterns in English and Italian judicial language. In V. Bhatia, G. Garzone, & R. Salvi (Eds.), Language and law in professional discourse (pp. 1028). Cambridge Scholars.
  27. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S., & Pontrandolfo, G. (2015). Legal phraseology today: Corpus-based applications across legal languages and genres. International Journal of Specialized Communication, 37, 130138. 10.24989/fs.v37i3-4.1287
  28. Hardie, A. (2014). Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal, 38(1), 73103. 10.2478/icame-2014-0004
  29. Hartig, A. J., & Lu, X. (2014). Plain English and legal writing: Comparing expert and novice writers. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 8796. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.09.001
  30. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
  31. Jusbrasil. (n.d.). Portal Jurídico JusBrasil. Retrieved from https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/.
  32. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141151. 10.1177/001316446002000116
  33. Krieger, M. G., Maciel, A. M. B., Bevilacqua, C. R., & Finatto, M. J. B. (2008). Dicionário de direito ambiental (2nd ed.). Lexikon.
  34. Krieger, M. G., Maciel, A. M. B., Bevilacqua, C. R., Finatto, M. J. B., & Reuillard, P. C. R. (2006). Glossário de gestão ambiental. Disal Editora.
  35. Krieger, M. G., Maciel, A. M. B., Bevilacqua, C. R., Rocha, J. C., & Finatto, M. J. B. (1998). Dicionário de direito ambiental. Editora da Universidade.
  36. Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors (Vol. 1). Blackwell.
  37. Lopes, L., & Pardo, T. (2024). Towards Portparser – a highly accurate parsing system for Brazilian Portuguese following the Universal Dependencies framework. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Processing of Portuguese – Vol. 1 (pp. 401410). Association for Computational Linguistics. aclanthology.org
  38. Lorz, R. A. (2019). Creating law with language – Crossing borders and connecting disciplines from the perspective of legislative practice. In F. Vogel (Ed.), Legal linguistics beyond borders: Language and law in a world of media, globalisation and social conflicts – Relaunching the International Language and Law Association (ILLA) (pp. 58). Duncker e Humblot.
  39. Maciel, A. M. B. (2001). Para o reconhecimento da especificidade do termo jurídico (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  40. Marques, C. G. de F. (2023). Análise multidimensional dos textos legais federais brasileiros [Master’s thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais]. 10.29327/5337817.1-29
  41. Marques, C. G. F., & Ferrari, L. A. (2023). Características gerais das leis federais brasileiras: Um estudo exploratório sob o enfoque da Análise Multidimensional. In Anais do XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Tecnologia da Informação e da Linguagem Humana (STIL 2023) (pp. 308317). 10.5753/stil.2023.233485
  42. Marques, C. G. F., Ferrari, L. A., & Kauffmann, C. H. (2025). Challenges in a multidimensional analysis of a Brazilian Portuguese corpus of federal statutory laws. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 25(1), 138. 10.1590/1984-6398202549849
  43. Martim, H. de, et al. (2018). Base de normas jurídicas brasileiras: Uma iniciativa de open government data. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 23(4), 133149. 10.1590/1981-5344/3567
  44. Mihatsch, W. (2020). Los orígenes discursivos de los atenuadores procedimentalizados ‘tipo’, ‘onda’, ‘corte’ y ‘rollo’: Una exploración microdiacrónica. Revista signos, 53(104), 686717. 10.4067/S0718-09342020000300686
  45. Móia, T., & Viotti, E. (2004). Differences and similarities between European and Brazilian Portuguese in the use of the gerúndio. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 3(1), 111139. 10.5334/jpl.21
  46. Nivre, J., de Marneffe, M.-C., Ginter, F., Hajič, J., Manning, C. D., Pyysalo, S., Schuster, S., Tyers, F., & Zeman, D. (2020). Universal Dependencies v2: An evergrowing multilingual treebank collection. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 40344043). European Language Resources Association.
  47. Onesti, C. (2011). Methodology for building a text-structure oriented legal corpus. Comparative Legilinguistics, 3748. 10.14746/cl.2011.08.04
  48. Pontrandolfo, G. (2012). Legal corpora: An overview. Rivista Internazionale di Tecnica della Traduzione, 121136. Retrieved from https://www.openstarts.units.it/bitstream/10077/9783/1/12Pontrandolfo.pdf.
  49. Rademaker, A., Chalub, F., Real, L., Freitas, C., Bick, E., & de Paiva, V. (2017). Universal Dependencies for Portuguese. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017) (pp. 197206).
  50. Sankoff, G. (2006). Age: Apparent time and real time. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 110116). Elsevier. 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6
  51. Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the Text. Language, Corpus, and Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203594070
  52. Sousa, A. W., & Fabro, M. D. D. (2019). Iudicium textum dataset: Uma base de textos jurídicos para NLP. In XXXIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Banco de Dados: Dataset Showcase Workshop, SBBD 2019 Companion. SBC. Retrieved from https://www.inf.ufpr.br/didonet/articles/2019_dsw_Iudicium_Textum_Dataset.pdf.
  53. Straka, M., & Straková, J. (2017). Tokenizing, POS tagging, lemmatizing and parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe. In Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (pp. 8899). Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/K17-3009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.578 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 91
Submitted on: Apr 25, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 4, 2026
Published on: Jul 3, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Lúcia de Almeida Ferrari, Luciana Dias de Macedo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.