Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lead White in Context Across Greco-Roman Sources: The First TheSu XML Annotation Dataset of Arguments and Recipes, with Graph Visualisations and Discussion of their Design Cover

Lead White in Context Across Greco-Roman Sources: The First TheSu XML Annotation Dataset of Arguments and Recipes, with Graph Visualisations and Discussion of their Design

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Argumentation Research Group. (2011). The Argument Interchange Format (AIF) Specification (Technical Report). School of Computing, University of Dundee. Retrieved from https://www.arg-tech.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/aif-spec.pdf
  2. Artechne Team, & Digital Humanities Lab. (2019). ARTECHNE Database – Technique in the Arts, 1500–1950 [Data set]. Zenodo.
  3. Bailey, K. C. (1932). The Elder Pliny’s Chapters on Chemical Subjects (Vol. Part 2; K. C. Bailey, Ed.). Edward Arnold.
  4. Bernardakis, G. N. (Ed.). (1892). Συμποσιακῶν προβλημάτων βιβλία θ᾿. In G. N. Bernardakis (Ed.), Plutarchi chaeronensis moralia (Vol. 4, pp. 62395). Teubner.
  5. Burnet, J. (Ed.). (1903). Λύσις. In J. Burnet (Ed.), Platonis Opera (Vol. 3, pp. 203223). Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oseo/instance.00254329
  6. Caley, E. R., & Richards, J. F. (Eds. & Trans.). (1956). Theophrastus: On Stones. Ohio state university.
  7. Cerrato, L., Almas, B., Buck, T. D., Hanhardt, A., Dee, S. R., Babeu, A., … Drymon, C. (2019). PerseusDL/canonical-greekLit (version 0.0.2867) [Dataset]. Zenodo.
  8. Crane, G. R., Muellner, L., Robertson, B., Babeu, A., Cerrato, L., Koentges, T., … Tauber, J. (2022). First1KGreek (version 1.1.6113) [Dataset]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.7015940
  9. Doury, M., & Pilon, P. (2025). Argumentative trees. what it takes, what it leaves. Argumentation et analyse du discours, 34(“Argumentation et Analyse du Discours”), 111138. 10.4000/13q0b
  10. Drakman, A., & Gelfgren, S. (2022). How to combine close and distant reading within the history of science and ideas: Two examples from ongoing research. Lychnos: Årsbok för Idé- och Lärdomshistoria, 85108. 10.48202/24128
  11. Eichholz, D. E. (Eds. & Trans.). (1965). Theophrastus: De lapidibus. Clarendon Press.
  12. Foster, W. (1934). Grecian and Roman stucco, mortar, and glass. Journal of Chemical Education, 11(4), 223. 10.1021/ed011p223
  13. Gliozzo, E., & Ionescu, C. (2022). Pigments—Lead-based whites, reds, yellows and oranges and their alteration phases. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 14(1), 17. 10.1007/s12520-021-01407-z
  14. Herfeld, C. (2025). Enhancing the function of case studies: The value of network analysis in integrated history and philosophy of science. Synthese, 205, 167. 10.1007/s11229-024-04792-9
  15. Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLOS ONE, 9(6), e98679. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
  16. Katsaros, T., Liritzis, I., & Laskaris, N. (2010). Identification of Theophrastus’ pigments egyptios kyanos and psimythion from archaeological excavations. A case study. ArcheoSciences. Revue d’archéométrie, 34, Article 34. 10.4000/archeosciences.2632
  17. Kirschner, C., Eckle-Kohler, J., & Gurevych, I. (2015). Linking the thoughts: Analysis of argumentation structures in scientific publications. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 111). Denver, CO: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/v1/W15-0501
  18. Kunzelman, D. (2008). Sui pigmenti bianchi. OPD Restauro, 20, 100120.
  19. Lenz, M., & Bergmann, R. (2025). ArgueMapper Assistant: Interactive argument mining using generative language models. In M. Bramer & F. Stahl (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence XLI. SGAI 2024 (pp. 189203). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-77915-2
  20. Liou, B., Zuinghedau, M., (Eds. & Transl.) & Cam, M.-T. (Comm.). (1995). Vitruve: De l’architecture. Livre VII. Les Belles Lettres.
  21. Lopes Cardoso, H., Sousa-Silva, R., Carvalho, P., & Martins, B. (2023). Argumentation models and their use in corpus annotation: Practice, prospects, and challenges. Natural Language Engineering, 29(4), 11501187. 10.1017/S1351324923000062
  22. Mardah, H. (2024). Critical Interpretation of Arguments Using Graphs and Representations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/critical-interpretation-of-arguments-using-graphs-and-representat
  23. Morrone, D. (2022). Plutarch’s Chemistry of Stones and Metals: Conceptions and Explanations. With an Appendix on the TheSu XML Annotation Scheme (Doctoral dissertation, Alma Mater Studiorum — Università di Bologna). 10.48676/unibo/amsdottorato/10376
  24. Morrone, D. (2023). TheSu XML Schema Definition, ns 1.0 [Dataset]. KU Leuven RDR. 10.48804/KD8QPO
  25. Morrone, D. (2026). TheSu-to-DOT: v1.0.1 – First release (with minor corrections) (v1.0.1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.20290594
  26. Penner, T., & Rowe, C. (2005). Plato’s Lysis. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Perseus Stable URIs. (n.d.). Perseus Stable URIs. Retrieved from https://sites.tufts.edu/perseusupdates/beta-features/perseus-stable-uris/ (Perseus Digital Library Updates. Retrieved 16 April 2025)
  28. Photos-Jones, E., Bots, P., Oikonomou, E., Hamilton, A., & Knapp, C. W. (2020). On metal and ‘spoiled’ wine: Analysing psimythion (synthetic cerussite) pellets (5th—3rd centuries BCE) and hypothesising gas-metal reactions over a fermenting liquid within a Greek pot. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(10), 243. 10.1007/s12520-020-01184-1
  29. Principe, L. M. (2018). Texts and practices: The promises and problems of laboratory replication and the chemical explanation of early alchemical processes. In E. Nicolaïdis (Ed.), Greek Alchemy from Late Antiquity to Early Modernity (pp. 159169). Brepols. 10.1484/M.DDA-EB.5.116318
  30. Putra, J. W. G., Matsumura, K., Teufel, S., & Tokunaga, T. (2023). TIARA 2.0: An interactive tool for annotating discourse structure and text improvement. Language Resources and Evaluation, 57(1), 529. (Original work published 2021). 10.1007/s10579-021-09566-0
  31. Rathkopf, C. (2024). Some benefits and limitations of modern argument map representation. Argumentation, 38, 199224. 10.1007/s10503-023-09626-5
  32. Rocci, A., & Lucchini, C. (2025). Diagramming the enthymematic structure of counterarguments. An introduction to IAMT Diagrams. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 34(“Argumentation et Analyse du Discours”), 185205. 10.4000/13q0e
  33. Shear, L. (1936). Psimythion. In E. Capps, J. T. Allen, & S. E. Barrett (Eds.), Classical Studies Presented to Edward Capps on His Seventieth Birthday (pp. 314317). Princeton University Press.
  34. Shields, R. A. J. (2025). Charity principles in philosophical argumentation. Argumentation, 39, 83102. 10.1007/s10503-024-09648-7
  35. Stede, M., & Schneider, J. (2019). Argumentation mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. 10.1007/978-3-031-02169-5
  36. Stevenson, L. G. (1955). Notes and queries: On the meaning of the words CERUSSA and PSIMITHIUM (PSIMYTHION). Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, X(1), 109111. 10.1093/jhmas/X.1.109
  37. Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab. (2020). argmin2015-DiGAT [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://github.com/UKPLab/argmin2015-DiGAT (Original work published 2015)
  38. van den Berg, H., Betti, A., Castermans, T., Koopman, R., Speckmann, B., Verbeek, K., … Westenberg, M. A. (2018). A philosophical perspective on visualization for digital humanities. In Proc. 3rd Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH). Retrieved from https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=8b14d5f6-956b-4947-9c56-85e478466c92
  39. Wang, X., Song, N., Zhou, H., & Cheng, H. (2022). The representation of argumentation in scientific papers: A comparative analysis of two research areas. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(6), 863878. 10.1002/asi.24590
  40. Wellmann, M. (1906). Pedanii Dioscuridis anazarbei de materia medica libri quinque (M. Wellmann, Ed.). Weidmann.
  41. Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  42. Wimmer, F. (1862). Fr. II. Πɛρὶ λίθων. In F. Wimmer (Ed.), Theophrasti eresii opera, quae supersunt, omnia (Vol. 3, pp. 3450). Teubner.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.568 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 76
Submitted on: Apr 16, 2026
Accepted on: May 20, 2026
Published on: Jun 16, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Daniele Morrone, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.