Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Palatine Anthology – Book 1: A Metrical and Prosodic Statistical Study Cover

The Palatine Anthology – Book 1: A Metrical and Prosodic Statistical Study

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Full Article

1 Overview

Repository location

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19445316

Context

The data were compiled within a project—carried out by the Romanian Academy in partnership with the University of Bucharest—aimed at producing the first Romanian metrical translation, critical edition, and commentary of the Anthologia Palatina (Nicolae et al., 2023, 2026). The Greek text constitutes the authors’ own edition, based primarily on the Codex Palatinus Graecus 23 (Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, 2025).

Within the Palatine Anthology, compiled in the 10th century, Book 1 stands out for its exclusively Christian content and the late period in which the poems were composed (5th–10th centuries). This book includes both epigrams stricto sensu—mostly anonymous, originating from churches or religious objects—as well as literary epigrams (prayers, short dogmatic interpretations) by known authors. Among these are:

  • 51 hexameter poems (260 hexameters),

  • 56 poems in elegiac distichs (77 hexameters + 77 pentameters),

  • 16 poems in iambic meter (86 lines).

The published database highlights the metrical and prosodic structure of each verse. For verses whose metrical formula differs from the edited text, the manuscript version is also provided. The following parameters are taken into account:

  • syllabic quantity, foot type, and metrical pattern;

  • metrical caesurae (formally defined by the coincidence of the word-end with a potentially caesurable metrical position, cf. Bassett, 1925; Brown, 2014), functional caesurae (understood as a rhythmical or logical—i.e. semantic and syntactic—τομή, Bassett, 1919, 345) and diaereses;

  • violations of the Meyer, Hermann, Naeke, and Hilberg bridges in hexameter (cf. Devine & Stephens, 1983), and the Porson bridge in iambic verse;

  • natural accent of words in final position within a verse and before a functional caesura, as well as homodynia (Allen, 1973, 260–268).

2 Method

The viewer software reads metrical annotations from .csv spreadsheets, verifies them against the Greek text, and produces a single self-contained .html file with interactive visual overlays.

Steps

Preliminary steps and sampling strategy. Segmentation

The available automated tools for hyphenation and syllabification (the division of words into syllables and the determination of syllabic quantity) and scansion (the establishing of metrical feet)—including large-scale language models (e.g. Gemini Pro)—proved inefficient. Therefore, a manual segmentation of the edited text was performed individually for each word, considering that synapheia (cf. Bozzone, 2024, 72) loses its relevance in the context of the byzantine verse. E.g., verse (1-a) is hyphenated as in (1-b), not as in (1-c).

  • (1)  a.   εἰσόκεν ἠέλιος πυριλαμπέα δίφρον ἐλαύνει                                 (AP 1.10.41)

              “as long as the Sun drives his fiery chariot”1

          b.   εἰσ#ό#κεν ἠ#έ#λι#ος πυ#ρι#λαμ#πέ#α δίφ#ρον ἐ#λαύ#νει

          c.   *εἰσ#ό#κε#νἠ#έ#λι#ος#πυ#ρι#λαμ#πέ#α#δίφ#ρο#νἐ#λαύ#νει

In the case of elisions, since syllabic segmentation is “the lowest level in a hierarchy of prosodic prominence assignment” (Devine & Stephens, 1994, 24), resyllabification was performed (see Figure 1, cf. Devine & Stephens, 1994, 235–248). However, when caesurae intervene2 or syntactic constraints occur (segmentations of syntactic phrases), they are given priority (see Figure 2).

Figure 1

Elision with resyllabification3 (AP 1.85.1, 1.7.4).

Figure 2

Elision without resyllabification (AP 1.47.2).

The muta cum liquida group was divided when it lengthened the preceding short vowel and transferred to the next syllable when it did not. Subsequently, the chain of long and short syllables was divided into feet according to the verse profile.

In the process of verse segmentation, the main difficulty was the caesura, for which there is no unanimous definition among specialists (Janse, 2003; Spaltenstein & Bianchi, 2004). We work with two concepts: the metrical caesura and the functional caesura (see references above). Among the metrical caesurae indicated by the software (marked with the black symbol ‖), the functional ones were manually determined as those that represent phonological pauses and do not break syntactic phrases (marked with the red symbol ‖). E.g., in verse (2-a), the software indicates the presence of four metrical caesurae in feet 1 (fem.), 2 (masc.), and 3 (masc.+fem.) (2-b). Among these, the trihemimeral caesura is functional (2-c).

  • (2)   a.  αὐτὸς ἑκών⋅ οὐ γάρ τις ἐπιχθονίων πολεμίζοι                  (AP 1.119.22)

                “[…] by his own will, for no earthly man could war […]”

             b.  αὐτὸς ‖ ἑ 1| κών⋅ ‖ οὐ 2| γάρ ‖ τις ‖ ἐ 3| πιχθονί 4| ων πολε 5| μίζοι 6

             c.  αὐτὸς ἑκών⋅ ‖ οὐ γάρ τις ἐπιχθονίων πολεμίζοι

In several verses, the functional character of the caesurae is debatable. Thus, in verse (3), the feminine metrical caesura in the third foot, although it functions as a phonological pause due to inversion, is not a functional caesura (it breaks the prepositional phrase (PP)).

  • (3)     ἤγαγεν [PP ἀχράντοισιν ‖ ὑπ’ ἐννεσίῃσι] τοκῆος               (AP 1.119.26)

             “he led […] by the immaculate command of his father […]”

Data pipeline

Hyphenation and scansion were exported as three .csv files (hexameter, iambic trimeter, elegiac pentameter). These are processed by meter-specific modules that parse the hyphenated Greek text into syllables, expand the metrical scheme into per-syllable quantities, and extract the given parameters from the spreadsheet columns. The software then computes metrical and prosodic features independently of the manual extraction—bridge violations, diaereses, metrical caesurae, homodynia—and compares the results, reporting all discrepancies as warnings. Using this process, the dataset was verified and corrected across multiple iterations.

Interactive viewer

The output is a single .html file with seven overlay toggles (colors, scansion marks, feet, diaereses, caesurae, bridges, homodynia), each applicable to the selected verse or to all verses simultaneously. Functional and metrical caesurae can be displayed independently. Verses are selected by clicking or navigating with arrow keys.

Examples of database usage

The database may be used in studies on the history of versification. The Palatine corpus – Book 1 reflects the transition from quantitative versification to versification based on natural stress. It combines archaic metrical and prosodic features (Homeric and Callimachean, such as the relatively high frequency of masculine caesurae and a greater number of spondees than in the Nonnian verse) with characteristics defining late, Nonnian-style poetry (e.g., a smaller number of metrical patterns in hexameter) and late byzantine versification (the iambic dodecasyllable verse). The verse structure is more distinctly spondaic in the Christian poems and, consequently, more rhythmically varied than in the Nonnian corpus. The epigrams average .89 spondees per line, compared to .75 in Nonnian verses (van Raalte, 1986, 32). Of the 32 possible rhythmic patterns, the hexameter verses of the first Palatine book feature only ten with a frequency greater than 1% and nine others with a frequency below 1% (Figure 3). By comparison, Homer uses 14 metrical patterns with a frequency over 1%, Callimachus 11, and Nonnus 7 (for these authors, see Ludwich, 1885, 317–322; van Raalte, 1986, 28–78; Schoisswohl & Papakitsos, 2020, 170).

Figure 3

The metrical patterns of hexameter verses in the Palatine corpus – Book 1.

The database is useful for studying the caesura. The most common type of caesura in the Greek hexameter occurs in the third foot (masculine and feminine) (for the distribution of caesurae, see Agosti, 2004, 64–73), which in the Palatine corpus appears metrically in over 98% of the verses, but functionally in only 67%. The nearly exhaustive presence of the metrical caesura in the third foot betrays a Nonnian versification pattern. Its functional occurrence in only two-thirds of the corpus gives way, in the remaining verses, to the bucolic diaeresis, which divides the verse according to the Alexandrian pattern (60.4% of verses have a metrical bucolic diaeresis, with this being segmentally realized in 23.5% of the verses). As illustrated in Figure 4, the Palatine verse is functionally divided by the third-foot caesura or the bucolic diaeresis into two cola and fragmented by other metrical caesurae (occasionally two in the same foot4). These metrical caesurae divide the verse into short phonological units, sometimes the length of a single word. Corroborating this observation with lexical analysis reveals the puzzle-like nature of the verses, in which epithets of Homeric origin and words derived or composed according to the same model fit into preformed metrical patterns that are easily incorporated into verse by authors who struggled with syllabic quantities.

Figure 4

Absolute values for caesurae and bucolic diaereses in hexameter.

Statistical analysis provides insight into premodern versification strategies. A relevant feature in this regard is the high proportion of masculine caesurae (penthemimeral) relative to feminine (trochaic) ones. While in the hexameter poems the feminine caesura is predominant, in the elegiac distich the caesura of the hexameter is predominantly masculine, as can be seen in Figure 5. The masculine division creates a first hemistich of the hexameter which is caesurated in the same way as the following pentameter. To make the effect clear, the masculine caesurae in the two lines are often highlighted by assonance, heralding the appearance of rhyme as a structuring element of poetic discourse, as in (4). The same phenomenon is manifested in AP 1.19.1–4, 1.70, 1.82, 1.88, 1.94.1–2, passim.

  • (4)     Τηλόθεν οὐχ ὑδάτων ⁞  μνηστεύετο πότνα Ῥεβέκκα,

  •                  νύμφης ἐξ ἐθνῶν  ⁞  οὕνεκέν ἐστι τύπος.                                      (AP 1.70)

             “The lady Rebecca was wooed not far from the water, because she is a figure of a gentile bride.”

Figure 5

Distribution of the third-foot caesura. Elegiac distich vs. hexameters κατὰ στίχον.

Understanding the phonological profile of Greek during the 5th–10th centuries. The study of syllable quantity and stress preceding caesurae provides insight with respect to the merely perceptively phonetic character—if not distinctively phonological—of vowel quantity. In both the iambic and pentameter corpora, the syllable to the left of the caesura tends to be long and unstressed. The relatively large number of masculine caesurae in the hexameter corpus is consistent with this phenomenon. This fact proves that, although vowel length had disappeared from the Greek language phonologically (Allen, 1973; Devine & Stephens, 1982, 1994), it was still perceptible phonetically and prosodically. Thus, the long syllable before the caesura was felt like a “delay” emphasizing the caesura. The avoidance of the natural accent, which has become a stress accent, contributes to the realization of the caesura as a syntactically and rhythmically significant “silence” (Călin, 2023, 75) or “musical hold” (Bassett, 1919, 344).

Quality control

The accuracy of the database is ensured through manual and automated cross-checks. Hyphenation was verified using the metrical scheme. Metrical caesurae and diaereses were determined automatically, while functional caesurae and functional bucolic diaereses were identified manually based on syntactic and semantic criteria (i.e., the isolation of syntactic phrases, the formation of syntactically and semantically complete cola). However, this process is not entirely unquestionable, so the user is encouraged to interpret the data presented.

3 Dataset Description

Repository name

Zenodo

Object name

Dataset: Greek Metrical and Prosodic Analysis – Anthologia Palatina Book I.

Format names and versions

Excel, CSV, HTML, PDF, py, txt

Creation dates

2025-01 to 2026-04.

Dataset creators

Simona Nicolae (University of Bucharest/Romanian Academy), Ioan-Andrei Nicolae (alumnus Princeton University, Politehnica University of Bucharest).

Language

Ancient Greek, English, French

License

The database and text are covered by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED. Visualization software distributed alongside the text is covered by GPLv3.

Publication date

2026-04-06.

4 Reuse Potential

Further research directions may include: the examination of data regarding syllable quantity in relation to caesurae; the violation of the Meyer and Porson bridges (in particular); the study of the morphology of the iambic dodecasyllable verse, descendant of the iambic trimeter and a sibling of the Romanic (hen)decasyllable, through the Latin iambic senarius (Burger, 1957; Duffell, 2008; Norberg, 1958).

Another potential use is a pedagogical one, as the .html viewer (Figure 6) serves as a tool both for the Palatine corpus that it contains and for any other hexameter, pentameter, or iambic corpus.

Figure 6

The interface of the HTML viewer.

The database will be periodically updated with the metrical-prosodic analysis of the remaining books of the Palatine Anthology. Should any reader find the software useful, we would appreciate if modifications to the code were contributed back to the project at https://github.com/Vexiona/metrical-viewer, or at least made publicly available. However, we do not impose any requirement to do so beyond what is needed under the GPLv3.

AI Declaration

The software was developed with significant use of generative AI. However, all behavior and output were independently verified by the authors.

Notes

[1] The English translations from the Palatine Anthology quoted in this article are by Paton (2014).

[2] Cf. Hermannus’s (1816, 33) observation: Sed tenendum est, elisionem syllabae neque apud Graecos neque apud Romanos caesurae officere “But we should keep in mind that the elision of a syllable does not prevent the caesura either among the Greeks or the Romans.”.

[3] The software displays long syllables in green, and short syllables in pale purple. Blue is used here to highlight the syllables involved in elision.

[4] For the distribution of the caesurae in the third foot, refer to column P in the “Hexameter” sheet in the anthologia_palatina.xlsx file (Nicolae & Șimon, 2026).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the team with whom they are editing, translating, and commenting on the epigrams of the Palatine Anthology in Romanian: Dr. Ștefan Zară, Ștefan Lungu, Dr. Margareta Sfirschi-Lăudat, Dr. Sorana-Cristina Man, as well as graduate student contributors Sebastian Clinciu and Ecaterina Clinciu.

Author Contributions

Simona Nicolae: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Cristian Șimon: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization.

Ioan-Andrei Nicolae: Data curation, Software.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.561 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 83
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2026
Accepted on: May 22, 2026
Published on: Jun 24, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Simona Nicolae, Cristian Șimon, Ioan-Andrei Nicolae, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.