References
- 1Bamman, D., & Crane, G. (2008). Guidelines for the Syntactic Annotation of the Ancient Greek Dependency Treebank 1.1 [The Perseus Project, Tufts University]. Retrieved from
https://static.perseids.org/guidelines-syntactic-annotation-greek-1-1.pdf (last accessed: 6 July 2021). - 2Cecchini, F. M., Korkiakangas, T., & Passarotti, M. (2020). A new Latin treebank for Universal Dependencies: Charters between Ancient Latin and Romance languages. In Proceedings of the 12th language resources and evaluation conference (pp. 933–942). Marseille, France:
European Language Resources Association . Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.117 (last accessed: 4 October 2021). - 3Celano, G. G. A. (2014a). A Computational Study on Preverbal and Postverbal Accusative Object Nouns and Pronouns in Ancient Greek. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 101, 97–110. DOI: 10.2478/pralin-2014-0006
- 4Celano, G. G. A. (2014b). Guidelines for the Annotation of the Ancient Greek Dependency Treebank. Retrieved from
https://github.com/PerseusDL/treebankdata/tree/master/AGDT2/guidelines (last accessed: 6 July 2021). - 5Celano, G. G. A. (2019).
The Dependency Treebanks for Ancient Greek and Latin . In M. Berti (Ed.), Digital Classical Philology (pp. 279–298). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110599572-016 - 6Crane, G. R. (1991). Generating and Parsing Classical Greek. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 6, 243–245. DOI: 10.1093/llc/6.4.243
- 7Depauw, M., & Van Beek, B. (2009). People in Greek Documentary Papyri. First Results of a Research Project. Journal of Juristic Papyrology, 39, 31–47.
- 8Elliott, T., Bodard, G., Cayless, H., et al. (2006). EpiDoc: Epigraphic Documents in TEI XML. Retrieved from
http://epidoc.stoa.org (last accessed: 6 July 2021). - 9Gorman, R. (2019). Author identification of short texts using dependency treebanks without vocabulary. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 35(4), 812–825. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqz070
- 10Gorman, V. B. (2020). Dependency Treebanks of Ancient Greek Prose. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 6(1). DOI: 10.5334/johd.13
- 11Gorman, V. B. (2021). Reading Ancient Greek in the Digital Age. Retrieved from
https://vgorman.com (last accessed: 6 August 2021). - 12Gorman, V. B., & Gorman, R. J. (2016). Approaching Questions of Text Reuse in Ancient Greek Using Computational Syntactic Stylometry. Open Linguistics, 2(1). DOI: 10.1515/opli-2016-0026
- 13Hajič, J. (1998).
Building a Syntactically Annotated Corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank . In Issues of Valency and Meaning. Studies in Honour of Jarmila Panevová (pp. 12–19). Prague: Charles University Press. - 14Keersmaekers, A. (2020). Automatic semantic role labeling in Ancient Greek using distributional semantic modeling. In Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Language Technologies for Historical and Ancient Languages (pp. 59–67). Marseille:
European Language Resources Association (ELRA) . - 15Keersmaekers, A., & Depauw, M. (in press).
Bringing Together Linguistics and Social History in Automated Text Analysis of Greek Papyri . In Classics@. Center for Hellenic Studies. - 16Keersmaekers, A., Mercelis, W., Swaelens, C., & Van Hal, T. (2019). Creating, Enriching and Valorizing Treebanks of Ancient Greek. In Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT, SyntaxFest 2019) (pp. 109–117). DOI: 10.18653/v1/W19-7812
- 17Mambrini, F. (2016).
The Ancient Greek Dependency Treebank: Linguistic Annotation in a Teaching Environment . In G. Bodard & M. Romanello (Eds.), Digital Classics Outside the Echo-Chamber: Teaching, Knowledge Exchange & Public Engagement (pp. 83–99). London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: 10.5334/bat.f - 18Mambrini, F. (2019). Nominal vs copular clauses in a diachronic corpus of Ancient Greek historians: A treebank-based analysis. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 19(1), 90–113. DOI: 10.1163/15699846-01901003
- 19Mambrini, F., & Passarotti, M. (2012). Will a Parser Overtake Achilles? First experiments on parsing the Ancient Greek Dependency Treebank. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT11).
30 November–1 December 2012 (pp. 133–144). Lisbon, Portugal. - 20Mambrini, F., & Passarotti, M. (2013). Non-projectivity in the Ancient Greek dependency treebank. In Proceedings of the second international conference on dependency linguistics (Depling 2013) (pp. 177–186). Prague:
Matfyzpress . Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/W13-3720/ (last accessed: 4 October 2021). - 21Vierros, M. (2018).
Linguistic Annotation of the Digital Papyrological Corpus . In N. Reggiani (Ed.), Digital Papyrology II. Case Studies on the Digital Edition of Ancient Greek Papyri (pp. 105–118). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110547450-006 - 22Vierros, M., & Henriksson, E. (2017). Preprocessing Greek Papyri for linguistic annotation. Journal of Data Mining & Digital Humanities, Special Issue on Computer-Aided Processing of Intertextuality in Ancient Languages. DOI: 10.46298/jdmdh.1385
- 23Vierros, M., & Yordanova, P. (in press).
Querying syntactic constructions in Ancient Greek parsed corpora: A case study on the genitive absolute in literature and documentary papyri . In A. Novokhatko, S. Chronopoulos, & F. K. Maier (Eds.), Classics@. Center for Hellenic Studies.