References
- 1Andreassen, H. N., Berez-Kroeker, A. L., Collister, L., Conzett, P., Cox, C., De Smedt, K., McDonnell, B., & the Research Data Alliance Linguistic Data Interest Group. (2019). Tromsø recommendations for citation of research data in linguistics. Research Data Alliance. DOI: 10.15497/rda00040
- 2Austin, P. K. (2017). Language Documentation and Legacy Text Materials. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics, 11, 23–44.
- 3Austin, P. K., & Grenoble, L. (2007).
Current Trends in Language Documentation . In P. K. Austin (Ed.), Language Documentation and Description, 4, 12–25. London: SOAS. - 4Berez-Kroeker, A. L., Gawne, L., Kung, S. S., Kelly, B. F., Heston, T., Holton, G., Pulsifer, P., Beaver, D. I., Chelliah, S., Dubinsky, S., Meier, R. P., Thieberger, N., Rice, K., & Woodbury, A. C. (2018). Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics, 56(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2017-0032
- 5Bernardini, S., & Petrović, M. M. (2021). Toward a new profile for twenty-first century language specialists: Industry, institutional and academic insights. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5030873
- 6Bird, S. (2020). Decolonising Speech and Language Technology. In D. Scott, N. Bel, & C. Zong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 3504–3519). Barcelona:
International Committee on Computational Linguistics . DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.313 - 7Broadbent, S. M. (1957). Rumsen I: Methods of Reconstitution. International Journal of American Linguistics, 23(4), 275–280. DOI: 10.1086/464419
- 8Dobrin, L., Austin, P. K., & Nathan, D. (2009).
Dying to be counted: the commodification of endangered languages in documentary linguistics . In P. K. Austin (Ed.), Language Documentation and Description, 6, 37–52. London: SOAS. - 9Doonan, A., Akmon, D., & Cosby, E. (2020). An Exploratory Analysis of Social Science Graduate Education in Data Management and Data Sharing. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.671
- 10Fenlon, K. S. (2020). Sustaining Digital Humanities Collections: Challenges and Community-Centred Strategies. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.725
- 11Goddard, I. (1973).
Philological Approaches to the Study of North American Indian Languages: Documents and Documentation . In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Linguistics in North America, 10, 727–745. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783111418780-023 - 12Grinevald, C. (2003).
Speakers and documentation of endangered languages . In P. K. Austin (Ed.), Language Documentation and Description, 1, 52–72. London: SOAS. - 13Hedstrom, M. (2012). Digital Data Curation – Examining Needs for Digital Data Curators. Paper presented at Cultural Heritage Online: Trusted Digital Repositories & Trusted Professionals. Florence:
Fondazione Rinascimento Digitale . - 14Helimski, E. (1997). Die Matorische Sprache, 41. Szeged: University of Szeged.
- 15Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36, 161–195. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161
- 16Holton, G. (2014).
Mediating language documentation . In D. Nathan & P. K. Austin (Eds.), Language Documentation and Description 12: Special Issue on Language Documentation and Archiving (p. 37–52). London: SOAS. - 17Knight, G. (2012). The Forensic Curator: Digital Forensics as a Solution to Addressing the Curatorial Challenges Posed by Personal Digital Archives. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(2), 40–63. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.228
- 18Kreps, C. (2003). Liberating Culture: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Museums, Curation and Heritage Preservation. Milton Park: Routledge.
- 19Lewis, M. P., & Simons, G. F. (2010). Assessing Endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue roumaine de linguistique, 55(2), 103–120.
- 20Linguistic Society of America. (1994). The Need for the Documentation of Linguistic Diversity. Statement, 1 June 1994. Retrieved from
https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/resolutions-statements-and-guides - 21Linguistic Society of America. (2010). Recognizing the Scholarly Merit of Language Documentation. Resolution, 8 January 2010. Retrieved from
https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/resolution-recognizing-scholarly-merit-language-documentation - 22Linguistic Society of America. (2018). Statement on Evaluation of Language Documentation for Hiring, Tenure, and Promotion. 25 September 2018. Retrieved from
https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/resolutions-statements-and-guides - 23Mets, M., Haak, A., Iva, T., Juhkason, G., Kalmus, M., Norvik, M., Pajusalu, K., Teras, P., Tuisk, T., & Vaba, L. (2014). Lõunaeesti keelesaarte tekstid. Eesti murded, IX. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut & Tartu Ülikool.
- 24Muñoz, T. (2013). Data Curation as Publishing for the Digital Humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(3).
- 25Muñoz, T., & Renear, A. (2011). Issues in Humanities Data Curation. Whitepaper for Humanities Data Curation Summit. Retrieved from
http://cirss.ischool.illinois.edu/paloalto/whitepaper/premeeting/ - 26Nowviskie, B. (2011). Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship. Professions, 169–181. DOI: 10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.169
- 27Penfield, S. D., & Tucker, B. V. (2011). From documenting to revitalizing an endangered language: where do applied linguists fit? Language and Education, 25(4), 291–305. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2011.577219
- 28Petrović, M. M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., Aragrande, G., & Barrón-Cedeño, A. (2021). Language data and project specialist: A new modular profile for graduates in language-related disciplines. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5030929
- 29Pryor, G., & Donnelly, M. (2009). Skilling Up to Do Data: Whose Role, Whose Responsibility, Whose Career? International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(2), 158–170. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v4i2.105
- 30Seidel, F. (2016).
Documentary linguistics: A language philology of the 21st century . In P. K. Austin (Ed.), Language Documentation and Description, 13, 23–63. London: SOAS. - 31Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Sinha, P., Pollock, D., Newman, J., Dalton, E., Frame, M., & Baird, L. (2016). Data Management Education from the Perspective of Science Educators. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(1), 232–251. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.389
- 32Thessen, A. E., Woodburn, M., Koureas, D., Paul, D., Conlon, M., Shorthouse, D. P., & Ramdeen, S. (2019). Proper Attribution for Curation and Maintenance of Research Collections: Metadata Recommendations of the RDA/TDWG Working Group. Data Science Journal, 18, 54. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-054
- 33Wasson, C., Holton, G., & Roth, H. S. (2016). Bringing User-Centered Design to the Field of Language Archives. Language Documentation & Conservation, 10, 641–681. Retrieved from
http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24721 - 34Weber, T. (2016). Kraasna – the state of documentation and description of an extinct South Estonian dialect. Bachelor thesis submitted at the Institut für Finnougristik/Uralistik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Retrieved from
https://kraasna.wordpress.com/ - 35Weber, T. (2019). Can Computational Meta-Documentary Linguistics Provide for Accountability and Offer an Alternative to “Reproducibility” in Linguistics? In M. Eskevich, G. de Melo, C. Fäth, J. P. McCrae, P. Buitelaar, C. Chiarcos, B. Klimek, & M. Dojchinovski (Eds.), 2nd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2019), 70, 26:1–26:8. Dagstuhl, Germany:
Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik . DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.LDK.2019.26 - 36Weber, T. (2020a).
Metadata Inheritance: New Research Paper, New Data, New Metadata? In A. Mannocci (Ed.), Reframing Research Workshop Accepted Papers. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4155362 - 37Weber, T. (2020b). A Philological Perspective on Meta-scientific Knowledge Graphs. In L. Bellatreche, M. Bieliková, O. Boussaïd, B. Catania, J. Darmont, E. Demidova, F. Duchateau, M. Hall, T. Merčun, B. Novikov, C. Papatheodorou, T. Risse, O. Romero, L. Sautot, G. Talens, R. Wrembel, & M. Žumer (Eds.), ADBIS, TPDL and EDA 2020 Common Workshops and Doctoral Consortium (pp. 226–233). Cham:
Springer International Publishing . DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55814-7 - 38Weber, T. (2021a). Consultant Identity in Historical Language Data: Anthroponyms as a Tool or as an Obstacle? In A. Choleva-Dimitrova, M. Vlahova-Angelova, & N. Dancheva (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Onomastic Conference “Anthroponyms and Anthroponymic Researches in the Beginning of 21st Century” (pp. 165–175). Sofia:
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences . - 39Weber, T. (2021b). Curation as a distinct academic activity – a perspective from working with legacy materials. Poster presented at the 7th International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (ICLDC). Retrieved from
http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74501 - 40Weber, T. (2021c). A linguistic analysis of Heikki Ojansuu’s phonograph recordings of Kraasna. (in press)
- 41Weber, T. (2021d). Mind the gap: Language data, their producers, and the scientific process. In D. Gromann, G. Sérasset, T. Declerck, J. P. McCrae, J. Gracia, J. Bosque-Gil, F. Bobillo, & B. Heinisch (Eds.), 3rd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2021), 93, 6:1–6:9. Dagstuhl, Germany:
Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik . DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.LDK.2021.6 - 42Weber, T. (2021e). Philology in the folklore archive: Interpreting past documentation of the Kraasna dialect of Estonian. (in press)
- 43Weber, T., & Bradley, J. (2018).
Exploring Finno-Ugric linguistics through solving IT problems . In D. Fišer & A. Pančur (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on Language Technologies & Digital Humanities (pp. 248–253). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana. - 44Winkler, E. (1994). Salis-Livische Sprachmaterialien, 21. Munich: LMU Munich.
- 45Winkler, E. (1997). Krewinisch. Zur Erschließung einer ausgestorbenen ostseefinnischen Sprache, 49. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
- 46Woodbury, A. C. (2014).
Archives and audiences: Toward making endangered language documentations people can read, use, understand, and admire . In D. Nathan & P. K. Austin (Eds.), Language Documentation and Description, vol 12: Special issue on language documentation and archiving (pp. 19–36). London: SOAS.