References
- Alvarado Rojas, A., & Twyman, M. (2025). Cultural data markets: Interpreting the popularity of public datasets. New Media & Society. 10.1177/14614448251359631
- Bartz-Beielstein, T., Doerr, C., Berg, D. van den, Bossek, J., Chandrasekaran, S., Eftimov, T., Fischbach, A., Kerschke, P., Cava, W. L., Lopez-Ibanez, M., Malan, K. M., Moore, J. H., Naujoks, B., Orzechowski, P., Volz, V., Wagner, M., & Weise, T. (2020). Benchmarking in optimization: Best practice and open issues. arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2007.03488
- Becker, H. S. (1996).
The epistemology of qualitative research . In Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 53–71). The University of Chicago Press. - Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 5185–5198).
Association for Computational Linguistics . 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 - Benotto, G. (2021). Can an author style be unveiled through word distribution? Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(1).
https://dhq.digitalhumanities.org/vol/15/1/000539/000539.html - Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11022.001.0001
- Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (PMLR 2018), USA, 81, 77–91.
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html - Campolo, A. (2021). “Thinking, judging, noticing, feeling”: John W. Tukey against the mechanization of inferential knowledge. KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge, 5(1), 83–111. 10.1086/713021
- Campolo, A., & Crawford, K. (2020). Enchanted determinism: Power without responsibility in artificial intelligence. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 1–19. 10.17351/ests2020.277
- Charmaz, K. (2005).
Grounded theory in the twenty first century: Applications for advancing social justice studies . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) The handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Sage Publications Ltd. - Clement, T. (2016).
Where is methodology in digital humanities? In L. F. Klein & M. K. Gold (Eds.) Debates in the Digital Humanities (pp. 153–175). University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.17 - Clement, T., & Acker, A. (2019). Data cultures, culture as data – Special issue of cultural analytics. Journal of Cultural Analytics. 10.22148/16.035
- Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. 10.1177/0306312702032002003
- Denton, R., Hanna, A., Amironesei, R., Smart, A., Nicole, H., & Scheuerman, M. K. (2020). Bringing the people back in: Contesting benchmark machine learning datasets. arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2007.07399
- Dobson, J. (2021). Interpretable outputs: Criteria for machine learning in the humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(2).
https://dhq.digitalhumanities.org/vol/15/2/000555/000555.html - Dombrowski, Q. (2021). Rolling the dice on project management. IDEAH, 2(2). 10.21428/f1f23564.0f419bf4
- Fu, K., Gurth, T., Laidlaw, D. H., & Nguyen, C. A. (2026). Visual exploration of a historical Vietnamese corpus of captioned drawings: A case study. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 10.1109/MCG.2026.3660122
- Gibbs, F., & Owens, T. (2013).
The hermeneutics of data and historical writing . In J. Dougherty & K. Nawrotzki (Eds.), Writing History in the Digital Age (pp. 159–170). University of Michigan Press. 10.2307/j.ctv65sx57.18 - Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. 10.2307/3178066
- Harding, S. (1992). After the neutrality ideal: Science, politics, and “strong objectivity.” Social Research, 59(3), 567–587.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40970706 - Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., & Grinter, R. E. (2010). Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, USA, 1311–1320. 10.1145/1753326.1753522
- Joyeux-Prunel, B. (2024). Digital humanities in the era of digital reproducibility: Towards a fairest and post-computational framework. International Journal of Digital Humanities, 6(1), 23–43. 10.1007/s42803-023-00079-6
- Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005).
Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 887–907). Sage Publications Ltd. - Kommers, C., Ahnert, R., Antoniak, M., Benetos, E., Benford, S., Bunz, M., Caramiaux, B., Concannon, S., Disley, M., Dobson, J., Du, Y., Duéñez-Guzmán, E., Francksen, K., Gius, E., Gray, J., Heuser, R., Immel, S., So, R., Leigh, S., … Hemment, D. (2025). Computational hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology. Social Science Research Network. 10.2139/ssrn.5409144
- Kraus, F., Blumenröhr, N., Götzelmann, G., Tonne, D., & Streit, A. (2024). A gold standard benchmark dataset for digital humanities. Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM 2024) co-located with the 23rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2024), USA, 1–17. 10.5445/ir/1000178023
- Lazer, D. M. J., Pentland, A., Watts, D. J., Aral, S., Athey, S., Contractor, N., Freelon, D., Gonzalez-Bailon, S., King, G., Margetts, H., Nelson, A., Salganik, M. J., Strohmaier, M., Vespignani, A., & Wagner, C. (2020). Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities. Science, 369(6507), 1060–1062. 10.1126/science.aaz8170
- Leonelli, S. (2018).
Rethinking reproducibility as a criterion for research quality . In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a aymposium on Mary Morgan: Curiosity, Imagination, and Surprise (Vol. 36B, pp. 129–146). Emerald Publishing Limited. 10.1108/S0743-41542018000036B009 - Munzner, T. (2009). A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 921–928. 10.1109/TVCG.2009.111
- Pankowska, P., Mendrik, A., Emery, T., & Garcia-Bernardo, J. (2023). Accelerating progress in the social sciences: The potential of benchmarks. OSF Preprints. 10.31235/osf.io/ekfxy
- Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. 10.1126/science.1213847
- Poirier, L. (2021). Reading datasets: Strategies for interpreting the politics of data signification. Big Data & Society, 8(2). 10.1177/20539517211029322
- Posner, M. (2014, April 17). How did they make that? The video! Miriam Posner.
https://miriamposner.com/blog/how-did-they-make-that-the-video/ - Prescott, A. (2023). Bias in big data, machine learning and AI: What lessons for the digital humanities? Digital Humanities Quarterly, 17(2).
https://dhq.digitalhumanities.org/vol/17/2/000689/000689.html - Pustu-Iren, K., Sittel, J., Mauer, R., Bulgakowa, O., & Ewerth, R. (2020). Automated visual content analysis for film studies: Current status and challenges. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 14(4).
https://dhq-static.digitalhumanities.org/pdf/000518.pdf - Ringler, H. (2024).
Computation and hermeneutics: Why we still need interpretation to be (computational) humanists . In Computational Humanities (pp. 3–17). University of Minnesota.https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/computational-humanities-5c64bbab-d7ca-41be-8f87-f26117a9a20f/section/cdccb7af-e7cd-4225-932a-f12da4214b1a#ch01 - Risam, R. (2019). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv7tq4hg
- Risam, R., & Gil, A. (2022). Introduction: The questions of minimal computing. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 16(2).
https://dhq-static.digitalhumanities.org/pdf/000646.pdf - Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2014).
Sociotechnical approaches to the study of information systems . In Computing Handbook (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. 10.1201/b16768-7 - Sedlmair, M., Meyer, M., & Munzner, T. (2012). Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2431–2440. 10.1109/TVCG.2012.213
- Segessenmann, J., Stadelmann, T., Davison, A., & Dürr, O. (2023). Assessing deep learning: A work program for the humanities in the age of artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics, 5(1), 1–32. 10.1007/s43681-023-00408-z
- Siemens, L. (2016).
Project management and the digital humanist . In C. Crompton, R. J. Lane, & R. Siemens (Eds.), Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research. (pp. 343–357). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315707860 - Sim, S. E., Easterbrook, S., & Holt, R. C. (2003). Using benchmarking to advance research: A challenge to software engineering. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2003), USA, 74–83. 10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201189
- Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
- Varela, M. E. (2021). Theater as data: Computational journeys into theater research. University of Michigan Press.
- Weber, L. M., Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R., Soneson, C., Hapfelmeier, A., Gardner, P. P., Boulesteix, A.-L., Saeys, Y., & Robinson, M. D. (2019). Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking. Genome Biology, 20, Article 125. 10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8
- Zhan, J. (2021). Call for establishing benchmark science and engineering. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 1(1), Article 100012. 10.1016/j.tbench.2021.100012