References
- Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901). Retrieved from
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html - Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., … Xie, X. (2023). A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models. Retrieved from
http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03109 (last accessed 10 August 2024). - Cummings, J. (2019). A world of difference: Myths and misconceptions about the TEI. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34, i58–i79. 10.1093/llc/fqy071
- De Cristofaro, M., & Zilio, D. (2025). Automating XML-TEI Encoding of Unpublished Correspondence: A Comparative Analysis of two LLM Approaches. Quaderni di Umanistica Digitale. 10.6092/UNIBO/AMSACTA/8380
- DeRose, S. J. (2024). Can LLMs help with XML? Retrieved from
https://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol29/print/DeRose01/BalisageVol29-DeRose01.html (last accessed 2 August 2025). - Ding, B., Qin, C., Liu, L., Chia, Y. K., Joty, S., Li, B., & Bing, L. (2023). Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator? In Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 11173–11195). Retrieved from
https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.625 - Dobson, J. (2020). Interpretable Outputs: Criteria for Machine Learning in the Humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(2).
- Forney, C., Haaf, S., & Kirsten, L. (2020). Letter Openers and Closers. Retrieved from
https://encoding-correspondence.bbaw.de/v1/openers-closers.html#c-3-2 (last accessed 9 November 2025). - Franken, L., Koch, G., & Zinsmeister, H. (2020).
Observations on Annotations . In J. Nantke & F. Schlupkothen (Eds.), Annotations in Scholarly Editions and Research (pp. 299–324). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110689112-014 - Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Kubli, M. (2023). ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30). 10.1073/pnas.2305016120
- Guo, Z., Jin, R., Liu, C., Huang, Y., Shi, D., Supryadi, … Xiong, D. (2023). Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey. Retrieved from
http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19736 (last accessed 03 March 2024). - Henny, U. (2018). Reviewing von digitalen Editionen im Kontext der Evaluation digitaler Forschungsergebnisse. Sonderband der Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften, 2. 10.17175/sb002_006
- Höflechner, W. (2021). Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall 1774–1856. Ein altösterreichisches Gelehrtenleben. Eine Annäherung. ADEVA.
- McGillivray, B., Poibeau, T., & Fabo, P. R. (2020). Digital Humanities and Natural Language Processing: “Je t’aime… moi non plus”. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 14(2).
- Pagel, A., Pichler, A., & Reiter, N. (2024). Über Prompt Brittleness, Prompt Generalisierbarkeit und Prompt Optimierung. Erste Erkenntnisse aus Fallstudien in den Computational Literary Studies. Retrieved from
https://web.archive.org/web/20241121155350/https://agki-dh.github.io/pages/webinar/page-10.html (last accessed 23 September 2025). - Pollin, C., Czmiel, A., Dumont, S., Fischer, F., Sahle, P., Schaßan, T., … Henny-Krahmer, U. (2024).
Generative KI, LLMs und GPT bei digitalen Editionen . In Dhd 2024 quo vadis dh. Passau, Deutschland. 10.5281/zenodo.10698210 - Pollin, C., Fischer, F., Sahle, P., Scholger, M., & Vogeler, G. (2025). When it was 2024 – Generative AI in the Field of Digital Scholarly Editions. Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften, 10. 10.17175/2025_008
- Pollin, C., Steiner, C., & Zach, B. (2023). New Ways of Creating Research Data: Conversion of Unstructured Text to TEI XML using GPT on the Correspondence of Hugo Schuchardt with a Web Prototype for Prompt Engineering. Retrieved from
https://chpollin.github.io/GM-DH/ (last accessed 27 October 2025). - Rastinger, N. (2024). Named Entity Recognition mit LLMs. Retrieved from
https://web.archive.org/web/20241121155350/https://agki-dh.github.io/slides/06_1_nlp_llm.pdf (last accessed 23 September 2025). - Sahle, P. (2014). Kriterien für die Besprechung digitaler Editionen. Retrieved from
https://www.i-d-e.de/publikationen/weitereschriften/kriterien-version-1-1/ (unter Mitarbeit von Georg Vogeler und den Mitgliedern des IDE, v1.1, last accessed 28 October 2025). - Santini, C. (2024). Combining language models for knowledge extraction from Italian TEI editions. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6. 10.3389/fcomp.2024.1472512
- Scholger, M., Strutz, S., & Pollin, C. (2024). Empowering Text Encoding with Large Language Models: Benefits and Challenges. Retrieved from
https://zenodo.org/records/13969082 (last accessed 26 May 2025). - Somala, V., & Emberson, L. (2025). Frontier AI performance becomes accessible on consumer hardware within a year. Retrieved from
https://epoch.ai/data-insights/consumer-gpu-model-gap (last accessed 31 October 2025). - Strutz, S. (2025). Towards an Evaluation Framework for Assessing Large Language Models in Text Encoding. In Adho digital humanities conference 2025 (dh 2025). NOVA FCSH, Lissabon:
Zenodo . 10.5281/zenodo.16364518 - Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., … Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. Retrieved from
https://openreview.net/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD (last accessed 10 August 2024). - Yang, J., Jiang, D., He, L., Siu, S., Zhang, Y., Liao, D., … Chen, W. (2025). StructEval: Benchmarking LLMs’ Capabilities to Generate Structural Outputs. Retrieved from
http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20139 (arXiv:2505.20139).