References
- 1Aalberg, T., Riva, P., & Zumer, M. (2024). LRMoo: Object-oriented definition and mapping from the IFLA Library Reference Model (Version 1.0) [Data set].
https://cidoc-crm.org/lrmoo/ModelVersion/version-1.0 - 2Adams, J. N. (2003). Bilingualism and the Latin Language (1st edn). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511482960
- 3Azzolini, A. C. M. (2025). Altinum. A Wikidata project for Latin epigraphy and prosopography. Epigraphy.Info IX, Aarhus, Denmark.
https://epigraphy.info/documents/workshop_9/Poster_8.pdf - 4Bodard, G., Cayless, H., Cenati, C., Cooley, A. E., Elliott, T., Evangelisti, S., Felicetti, A., Granados, P., Grieshaber, F., Gruber, E., Hershkowitz, A., Hill, T., Kiiskinen, H., Kollatz, T., Levivier, A., Liuzzo, P. M., Luciani, F., Mannocci, A., Mataix, E., … Weise, F. (2021). Modeling Epigraphy with an Ontology. 10.5281/ZENODO.4639507
- 5Bodel, J., Prag, J. R. W., & Roueché, C. (2024).
Open scholarship: Epigraphic corpora in the digital age . In P. Fröhlich & M. N. Caballero (Eds.), L’épigraphie au XXIe siècle. Actes du XVIe Congrès International d’Épigraphie Grecque et Latine, Bordeaux, 29 août-02 septembre 2022 (pp. 91–117). Ausonius. - 6Brunet, M., Rousset, M., & Morlock, E. (2022). EpiVoc: Thésaurus épigraphique [Data set]. OpenTheso.
https://thesaurus.mom.fr/?idt=th61 - 7Creamer, A., Lembi, G., Mylonas, E., & Satlow, M. (2021). Archiving a TEI Project FAIRly. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, Issue 14. 10.4000/jtei.4324
- 8Doerr, M., Kritsotaki, A., Rousakis, Y., Hiebel, G., Theodoridou, M., & Velios, Athanasios. (2023). CRMsci: An Extension of CIDOC-CRM to support scientific observation (Version 2.0) [Data set].
https://cidoc-crm.org/crmsci/ModelVersion/version-2.0 - 9Elliott, T., Bodard, G., Mylonas, E., Stoyanova, S., Tupman, C., & Vanderbilt, S. (2017–2025). EpiDoc Guidelines: Ancient documents in TEI XML (Version 9.7).
https://epidoc.stoa.org/gl/latest/ - 10Heřmánková, P., Asif, I., Prag, J., & Horster, M. (2025). FAIR Epigraphic Vocabularies: Type of Inscription (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.17454135
- 11Heřmánková, P., Horster, M., & Prag, J. R. W. (2022). Digital Epigraphy in 2022: A Report from the Scoping Survey of the FAIR Epigraphy Project (Version v1.0.0). Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.6610696
- 12Heřmánková, P., Kaše, V., & Sobotkova, A. (2021). Inscriptions as data: Digital epigraphy in macro-historical perspective. Journal of Digital History, 1(1), 99–141. 10.1515/jdh-2021-1004
- 13Koch, I., Ribeiro, C., Poveda-Villalón, M., Rico, M., & Teixeira Lopes, C. (2024).
Enriching Archival Linked Data Descriptions with Information from Wikidata and DBpedia . In A. Antonacopoulos, A. Hinze, B. Piwowarski, M. Coustaty, G. M. Di Nunzio, F. Gelati, & N. Vanderschantz (Eds.), Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (Vol. 15177, pp. 396–412). Springer Nature Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-031-72437-4_23 - 14Laurence, R., & Trifilò, F. (2023). Mediterranean Timescapes: Chronological Age and Cultural Practice in the Roman Empire (1st edn). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315267708
- 15Liuzzo, P. M. (2015).
EAGLE and EUROPEANA: Architecture Problems for Aggregation and Harmonization . Symposium on Cultural Heritage Markup, Washington, DC. 10.4242/BalisageVol16.Liuzzo01 - 16Liuzzo, P. M. (2019). Digital Approaches to Ethiopian and Eritrean Studies (1st edn). Harrassowitz, O. 10.2307/j.ctvrnfr3q
- 17Liuzzo, P. M., Fasolini, D., & Rocco, A. (2013). Content harmonisation guidelines, including GIS and terminologies—Second Release (D 2.2.2, version n 4.0) [Deliverable: Europeana network of Ancient Greek and Latin Epigraphy].
https://www.eagle-network.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/EAGLE_D2.2.2_Content-harmonisation-guidelines-including-GIS-and-terminologies-Second-Release.pdf - 18Mullen, A. (2025). FAIR Epigraphic Vocabularies: Bilingualism in epigraphy (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.17569510
- 19Mullen, A., & Willi, A. (Eds.) (2024). Latinization, Local Languages, and Literacies in the Roman West. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/9780191994760.001.0001
- 20Mullen, A., Vanderbilt, S., Willi, A., Houten, P., & Stoyanova, S. (2025) ‘LatinNow Project Data’. Version 0.1. November 14; GitHub,
https://github.com/LatinNow/LatinNowProjectData - 21Murano, F., & Felicetti, A. (2020). Definition of the CRMtex: An Extension of CIDOC CRM to Model Textual Entities (Version 1.0) [Data set].
https://cidoc-crm.org/crmtex/ModelVersion/version-1.0 - 22Murano, F., Felicetti, A., & Fafalios, P. (2023). Definition of the CRMtex: An Extension of CIDOC CRM to Model Textual Entities (Version 2.0) [Data set].
https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/CRMtex_v2.0_June_2023.pdf - 23Orlandi, S., Santucci, R., Casarosa, V., & Liuzzo, P. M. (Eds.). (2014). Information Technologies for Epigraphy and Cultural Heritage: Proceedings of the First EAGLE International Conference. Sapienza Università Editrice.
https://www.eagle-network.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Paris-Conference-Proceedings.pdf - 24Ortimini, P. (2025).
Wikibase for epigraphy: The instance Greek Metrical Inscriptions . Epigraphy.Info IX, Aarhus, Denmark. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.15102921 - 25Prag, J. R. W. (2017–2025). I.Sicily: Inscriptions of Ancient Sicily.
http://sicily.classics.ox.ac.uk - 26Prag, J. R. W., Horster, M., Hermankova, P., & Asif, I. (2022). FAIR Epigraphy: Too many databases? Or just not enough linked data? Zenodo.
https://zenodo.org/record/7732691 - 27Ripoll, M., Reeves, N., Kurteva, A., Simperl, E., Peñuela, A. M., & Diepold, K. (2025). Filling in the Blanks? A Systematic Review and Theoretical Conceptualisation for Measuring WikiData Content Gaps (Version 2). arXiv. 10.48550/ARXIV.2505.16383
- 28Roueche, C., Vagionakis, I., & BODARD, G. (2022). Inscriptions of Roman Tripolitania 2021: The authority lists (p. 892946 Bytes) [Data set]. King’s College London. 10.18742/19182014.V1
- 29Tamrazyan, H., & Hovhannisyan, G. (2025). Cultural Categorization in Epigraphic Heritage Digitization. Heritage, 8(5),
148 . 10.3390/heritage8050148 - 30Thornton, K., Seals-Nutt, K., & Chen, A. (2024a). Dura-Europos Stories: Developing interactive storytelling applications using knowledge graphs for cultural heritage exploration. Semantic Web, 1–15. 10.3233/SW-243552
- 31Thornton, K., Seals-Nutt, K., & Chen, A. (2024b). Encoding Archaeological Data Models as Wikidata Schemas: Utilizing Shape Expressions to Structure Collaborative Linked Open Data for Digital Storytelling Within the International Dura-Europos Archive. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 21(1), 69–83. 10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v21i01/69-83
- 32Tupman, C. (2021).
Where Can Our Inscriptions Take Us? Harnessing the Potential of Linked Open Data for Epigraphy . In I. Velasquéz Soriano & D. Espinosa Espinosa (Eds.), Epigraphy in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges in the Recording, Analysis and Dissemination of Inscriptions (pp. 115–128). Archaeopress. 10.2307/j.ctv1xsm8s5.15 - 33Untner, L. (2025). Wikidata to CIDOC CRM (wiki2crm) (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.17396141
- 34Vrandečić, D., & Krötzsch, M. (2014). Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebase. Communications of the ACM, 57(10), 78–85. 10.1145/2629489
- 35Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1),
160018 . 10.1038/sdata.2016.18