References
- Akopyan, O., Barton, W., Baumgartner, F., Berrens, D., Kirchler, U., Korenjak, M., Luggin, J., Tautschnig, I., & Zathammer, S. (2023). Noscemus Wiki [Dataset]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.7855322
- Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017). Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 135–146. 10.1162/tacl_a_00051
- Burns, P. J. (2023). LatinCy: Synthetic Trained Pipelines for Latin NLP (Version 1). arXiv. 10.48550/ARXIV.2305.04365
- Denooz, J. (2004). Opera Latina: Une base de données sur internet. Euphrosyne, 32, 79–88. 10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.125535
- Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. 10.48550/ARXIV.1810.04805
- Ehrmanntraut, A., Hagen, T., Konle, L., & Jannidis, F. (2021). Type- and Token-based Word Embeddings in the Digital Humanities. CHR 2021: Computational Humanities Research 2021, 2989,
23 . - Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional Structure. Word World, 10(2–3), 146–162. 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
- Hedesan, G., Huber, A., Kodetová, J., Kříž, O., Kubíčková, J., Kaše, V., & Pavlas, P. (2025). EMLAP (Version v0.4) [Dataset]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.14765294
- Lenci, A. (2018). Distributional Models of Word Meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 151–171. 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125254
- Lenci, A., Sahlgren, M., Jeuniaux, P., Cuba Gyllensten, A., & Miliani, M. (2022). A comparative evaluation and analysis of three generations of Distributional Semantic Models. Language Resources and Evaluation, 56(4), 1269–1313. 10.1007/s10579-021-09575-z
- Longree, D., Fantoli, M., & LASLA (ULiège). (2023). LASLAfiles_Latin_DATformat [Dataset]. ULiège Open Data Repository. 10.58119/ULG/27VZID
- McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018). UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction (Version 3). arXiv. 10.48550/ARXIV.1802.03426
- Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013).
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality . In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013), Vol. 26, pp. 3111–3119). New York City: Curran Associates, Inc. 10.48550/arXiv.1310.4546 - Montani, I., Honnibal, M., Honnibal, M., Van Landeghem, S., Boyd, A., Peters, H., McCann, P. O., Geovedi, J., O’Regan, J., Samsonov, M., Orosz, G., De Kok, D., Blättermann, M., Altinok, D., Kristiansen, S. L., Madeesh Kannan, Mitsch, R., Bournhonesque, R., Edward, … Tamura, Y. (2023). spaCy: Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python (Version v3.5.1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.10009823
- Passarotti, M. (2010). Leaving behind the less-resourced status. The case of latin through the experience of the index thomisticus treebank. 7th SaLTMiL Workshop on Creation and Use of Basic Lexical Resources for Less-Resourced Languages LREC 2010. Valetta, Malta,
23 May 2010 Workshop Programme, 27. - Passarotti, M. (2015).
What you can do with linguistically annotated data. From the Index Thomisticus to the Index Thomisticus Treebank . In P. Roszak & J. Vijgen (Eds.), Reading Sacred Scripture with Thomas Aquinas. Hermeneutical Tools. Theological Questions and New Perspectives (pp. 3–44). Turnhout: Brepols. 10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.4.000129 - Pražák, O., Přibáň, P., Taylor, S., & Sido, J. (2020).
UWB at SemEval-2020 Task 1: Lexical Semantic Change Detection . In A. Herbelot, X. Zhu, A. Palmer, N. Schneider, J. May, & E. Shutova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (pp. 246–254). International Committee for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.30 - Řehůřek, R., & Sojka, P. (2010). Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, 45–50.
http://is.muni.cz/publication/884893/en (last accessed 10 October 2025). - Sahlgren, M. (2008). The distributional hypothesis. Rivista Di Linguistica, 20(1), 33–53.
- Schlechtweg, D., McGillivray, B., Hengchen, S., Dubossarsky, H., & Tahmasebi, N. (2020).
SemEval-2020 Task 1: Unsupervised Lexical Semantic Change Detection . In A. Herbelot, X. Zhu, A. Palmer, N. Schneider, J. May, & E. Shutova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (pp. 1–23). International Committee for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.1 - Sprugnoli, R., Moretti, G., & Passarotti, M. (2020). Building and Comparing Lemma Embeddings for Latin. Classical Latin versus Thomas Aquinas. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics, 6(1). 10.4000/ijcol.624
- Sprugnoli, R., Passarotti, M., & Moretti, G. (2019). Vir is to Moderatus as Mulier is to Intemperans—Lemma Embeddings for Latin. Proceedings of the Sixth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics Bari, Italy,
13–15 November 2019 . 10.5281/zenodo.3565572 - van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing Data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(86), 2579–2605.
- Venna, J., & Kaski, S. (2001).
Neighborhood Preservation in Nonlinear Projection Methods: An Experimental Study . In G. Dorffner, H. Bischof, K. Hornik (Eds.), Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2001. ICANN 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2130 (pp 485–491). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/3-540-44668-0_68 - Zathammer, S. (2025). Noscemus Digital Sourcebook [Dataset]. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.15040256