Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data from ‘The Dative Alternation Revisited: Fresh Insights from Contemporary British Spoken Data’ Cover

Data from ‘The Dative Alternation Revisited: Fresh Insights from Contemporary British Spoken Data’

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. 1Love, R, Dembry, C, Hardie, A, Brezina, V and McEnery, T. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 2017; 22(3): 319344. DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
  2. 2Jenset, G B, McGillivray, B and Rundell, M. The English dative alternation revisited: Fresh insights from contemporary British spoken data. In: Brezina, V, Love, R and Aijmer, K (eds.), Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech: Sociolinguistic studies of the spoken BNC2014. London: Routledge; 2018; 185207. DOI: 10.4324/9781315268323-10
  3. 3Hardie, A. Using the Spoken BNC2014 in CQPweb. In: Brezina, V, Love, R and Aijmer, K (eds.), Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech: Sociolinguistic studies of the spoken BNC2014. 2018; 2730. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315268323-4
  4. 4R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
  5. 5Rayson, P, Archer, D, Piao, S and McEnery, A M. The UCREL semantic analysis system; 2004.
  6. 6Jenset, G B and McGillivray, B. Quantitative historical linguistics: A corpus framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198718178.001.0001
  7. 7Berez-Kroeker, A L, Gawne, L, Kung, S S, Kelly, B F, Heston, T, Holton, G, et al. Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics. 2018; 56(1): 118. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2017-0032
  8. 8Geeraerts, D. Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In: Kristiansen, G, Achard, M, Dirven, R and Ruiz de Mendoza, F (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. 2006; 2149. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  9. 9Arppe, A, Gilquin, G, Glynn, D, Hilpert, M and Zeschel, A. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora. 2010; 5(1): 127. DOI: 10.3366/cor.2010.0001
  10. 10Arnold, J E, Losongco, A, Wasow, T and Ginstrom, R. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language. 2000; 76(1): 2855. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2000.0045
  11. 11Bresnan, J, Cueni, A, Nikitina, T and Baayen, R H. Predicting the dative alternation. In: Bouma, G, Kraemer, I and Zwarts, J (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation. 2007; 6994. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences.
  12. 12Jenset, G B and Johansson, C. Lexical fillers influence the dative alternation: Estimating constructional saliency using web document frequencies. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. 2013; 20(1): 1344. DOI: 10.1080/09296174.2012.754597
  13. 13Bresnan, J and Hay, J. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua. 2008; 118(2): 24559. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007
  14. 14Bresnan, J and Ford, M. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language. 2010; 86(1): 168213. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0189
  15. 15Kendall, T, Bresnan, J and Van Herk, G. The dative alternation in African American English: Researching syntactic variation and change in a conglomerated corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 2011; 7(2): 22944. DOI: 10.1515/cllt.2011.011
  16. 16Bernaisch, T, Gries, S T and Mukherjee, J. The dative alternation in South Asian English (es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide. 2014; 35(1): 731. DOI: 10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber
  17. 17Szmrecsanyi, B, Grafmiller, J, Bresnan, J, Rosenbach, A, Tagliamonte, S and Todd, S. Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. 2017; 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.310
  18. 18Baayen, R H. languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. [Internet]: 2013. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR.
  19. 19Baayen, R H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
  20. 20McGillivray, B. Methods in Latin computational linguistics. Leiden: Brill; 2014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.11 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Published on: Aug 22, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Gard B. Jenset, Barbara McGillivray, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 5 (2019): Issue 1