Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reception Reader: Exploring Text Reuse in Early Modern British Publications Cover

Reception Reader: Exploring Text Reuse in Early Modern British Publications

Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. 1Büchler, M., Burns, P. R., Müller, M., Franzini, E., & Franzini, G. (2014). Towards a historical text re-use detection. Text Mining: From Ontology Learning to Automated Text Processing Applications (pp. 221238). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_11
  2. 2Citron, D. T., & Ginsparg, P. (2015). Patterns of text reuse in a scientific corpus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(1), 2530. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415135111
  3. 3Cordell, R. (2015). Reprinting, circulation, and the network author in antebellum newspapers. American Literary History, 27(3), 417445. DOI: 10.1093/alh/ajv028
  4. 4de Bolla, P., Jones, E., Nulty, P., Recchia, G., & Regan, J. (2020). The idea of liberty, 1600–1800: A distributional concept analysis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 81(3), 381406. DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2020.0023
  5. 5Gavin, M. (2016). Historical text networks: The sociology of early English criticism. Eighteenth-Century Studies (pp. 5380). DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2016.0041
  6. 6Gladstone, C., & Cooney, C. (2020). Opening new paths for Scholarship: Algorithms to track text reuse in Eighteenth-Century Collections Online. Digitizing Enlightenment. Digital Humanities and the Transformation of Eighteenth-Century Studies. Oxford University Studies in Enlightenment. Liverpool: Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment (pp. 353371).
  7. 7Hitchcock, T., & Shoemaker, R. (2006). Digitising history from below: The Old Bailey proceedings online, 1674–1834. History Compass, 4(2), 193202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2006.00309.x
  8. 8Hume, D. (2000). An enquiry concerning human understanding: A critical edition T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.). Oxford University Press.
  9. 9Jauss, H. R. (2019). The identity of the poetic text in the changing horizon of understanding. In Identity of the Literary Text (pp. 146174). University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.3138/9781487574796-009
  10. 10Ladd, J. R. (2021). Imaginative networks: Tracing connections among early modern book dedications. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 6(1). DOI: 10.22148/001c.21993
  11. 11Lahti, L., Marjanen, J., Roivainen, H., & Tolonen, M. (2019). Bibliographic Data Science and the History of the Book (c. 1500–1800). Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 57(1), 523. DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2018.1543747
  12. 12Lee, J. S. (2007). A computational model of text reuse in ancient literary texts. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 472479).
  13. 13Mäkelä, E., Lagus, K., Lahti, L., Säily, T., Tolonen, M., Hämäläinen, M., Kaislaniemi, S., & Nevalainen, T. (2020). Wrangling with non-standard data. Proceedings of the Digital Humanities in the Nordic Countries 5th Conference. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2612/paper6.pdf
  14. 14Manjavacas, E., Long, B., & Kestemont, M. (2019). On the feasibility of automated detection of allusive text reuse. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1905.02973. DOI: 10.18653/v1/W19-2514
  15. 15Mullen, L. (2016). America’s public bible: Biblical quotations in US newspapers. Journal of American History, 104(4), 10971098. DOI: 10.1093/jahist/jax556
  16. 16Salmi, H., Paju, P., Rantala, H., Nivala, A., Vesanto, A., & Ginter, F. (2020). The reuse of texts in Finnish newspapers and journals, 1771–1920: A digital humanities perspective. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 54(1), 1428. DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2020.1803166
  17. 17Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 353. DOI: 10.2307/2504188
  18. 18Smith, D. A., Cordell, R., & Dillon, E. M. (2013). Infectious texts: Modeling text reuse in nineteenth-century newspapers (pp. 8694). DOI: 10.1109/BigData.2013.6691675
  19. 19Spencer, M., & Tolonen, M. (in press). The Reception of David Hume’s Essays in Eighteenth-Century Britain. In Hume’s Essays: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
  20. 20Thompson, M. P. (1993). Reception theory and the interpretation of historical meaning. History and Theory (pp. 248272). DOI: 10.2307/2505525
  21. 21Tolonen, M., Mäkelä, E., & Lahti, L. (2022). The Anatomy of Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO). Eighteenth-Century Studies, 56(1), 95123. DOI: 10.1353/ecs.2022.0060
  22. 22Tolonen, M., Mäkelä, E., Marjanen, J., & Tahko, T. (2020). Arvutiteaduse kaasamine humanitaarharidusse. Methis: Studia Humaniora Estonica. DOI: 10.7592/methis.v21i26.16909
  23. 23Tolonen, M., Marjanen, J., Kanner, A., Mäkelä, E., Lahti, L., Vaara, V., Roivainen, H., Tarkka-Robinson, L., & Lähteenoja, V. (2017). OCTAVO–Analysing Early Modern Public Communication [Poster]. Digital Humanities, Oxford Summer School.
  24. 24Tolonen, M., Matres, I., & Oiva, M. (2018). In between research cultures: The state of digital humanities in Finland. Informaatiotutkimus. DOI: 10.23978/inf.71160
  25. 25Tolonen, M., Vaara, V., & Vesanto, A. (2018). Text reuse and Eighteenth-Century Histories of England. Digital humanities in the Nordic Countries DHN2018.
  26. 26Vesanto, A. (2019). Detecting and analyzing text reuse with BLAST. Pro Gradu-Tutkielma. https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/146706
  27. 27Vesanto, A., Ginter, F., Salmi, H., Nivala, A., & Salakoski, T. (2017). A system for identifying and exploring text repetition in large historical document corpora. Proceedings of the 21st Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics. (pp. 330333). Gothenburg, Sweden.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.101 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Published on: Apr 17, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 David Rosson, Eetu Mäkelä, Ville Vaara, Ananth Mahadevan, Yann Ryan, Mikko Tolonen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.