Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Genesis or Evolution of Gender Differences? Worldview-Based Dilemmas in The Processing of Scientific Information Cover

Genesis or Evolution of Gender Differences? Worldview-Based Dilemmas in The Processing of Scientific Information

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 3554. DOI: 10.1177/0963662506070159
  2. Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016). The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354, 182183. DOI: 10.1126/science.aah4567
  3. Attwell, K., Ward, P. R., Meyer, S. B., Rokkas, P. J., & Leask, J. (2018). “Do-it-yourself”: Vaccine rejection and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Social Science & Medicine, 196, 106114. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.022
  4. Baumgaertner, B., Carlisle, J. E., & Justwan, F. (2018). The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate. PLOS ONE, 13, e0191728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191728
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78117. DOI: 10.1177/0049124187016001004
  6. Browne, M., Thomson, P., Rockloff, M. J., & Pennycook, G. (2015). Going against the herd: Psychological and cultural factors underlying the ‘vaccination confidence gap’. PLOS ONE, 10, e0132562. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132562
  7. Bryden, G. M., Browne, M., Rockloff, M., & Unsworth, C. (2018). Anti-vaccination and pro-CAM attitudes both reflect magical beliefs about health. Vaccine, 36, 12271234. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.068
  8. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 149. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00023992
  9. Buss, D. M. (1996). Sexual conflict: Evolutionary insights into feminism and the “battle of the sexes”. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 296318). Oxford University Press.
  10. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491503. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x
  11. Cain, P. A. (1989). Feminism and the limits of equality. Georgia Law Review, 24, 803847.
  12. Castagno, A. E. (2017). Liberal ideologies and federal school reform: Following individualism, meliorism, and neutrality through SIG policy to Adelante Alternative School. Urban Education. DOI: 10.1177/0042085916685762
  13. Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235259. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
  14. Eagly, A. H. (2018). The shaping of science by ideology: How feminism inspired, led, and constrained scientific understanding of sex and gender. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 871888. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12291
  15. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature-nurture debates. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 340357. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613484767
  16. Ecklund, E. H., Scheitle, C. P., Peifer, J., & Bolger, D. (2017). Examining links between religion, evolution views, and climate change skepticism. Environment and Behavior, 49, 9851006. DOI: 10.1177/0013916516674246
  17. Ernst, E. (2002). Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: Reasons and consequences for vaccination. Vaccine, 20, S90S93. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00290-0
  18. Everett, J. A. (2013). The 12 item social and economic conservatism scale (SECS). PLOS ONE, 8, e82131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082131
  19. Fine, C. (2013). Is there neurosexism in functional neuroimaging investigations of sex differences? Neuroethics, 6, 369409. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-012-9169-1
  20. Fine, C., Joel, D., Jordan-Young, R., Kaiser Trujillo, A. C., & Rippon, G. (2014). Why males ≠ corvettes, females ≠ volvos, and scientific criticism ≠ ideology: A response to “equal ≠ the same: Sex differences in the human brain” by Larry Cahill in Cerebrum. Cerebrum: The Dana forum on brain science.
  21. Fine, C., Jordan-Young, R., Kaiser, A., & Rippon, G. (2013). Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity… and the rigid problem of sex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 550551. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010
  22. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 2542. DOI: 10.1257/089533005775196732
  23. Gale, N. (2014). The sociology of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology Compass, 8, 805822. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12182
  24. Gangarosa, E. J., Galazka, A. M., Wolfe, C. R., Phillips, L. M., Gangarosa, R. E., Miller, E., & Chen, R. T. (1998). Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: The untold story. Lancet, 351, 356361. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04334-1
  25. Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493496. DOI: 10.1126/science.1215647
  26. Hamilton, L. C. (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104, 231242. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
  27. Hamilton, L. C. (2015). Conservative and liberal views of science: Does trust depend on topic? (Regional issue brief No. 45). University of New Hampshire. DOI: 10.34051/p/2020.242
  28. Hamilton, L. C., Hartter, J., Lemcke-Stampone, M., Moore, D. W., & Safford, T. G. (2015). Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLOS ONE, 10, e0138208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138208
  29. Hamilton, L. C., Hartter, J., & Saito, K. (2015). Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open, 5. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015602752
  30. Hayduk, L. (1996). LISREL issues, debates, and strategies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
  31. Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T., & Jylhä, K. M. (2018). What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism?: Revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 2937. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.001
  32. Hodson, G., & MacInnis, C. C. (2017). Can left-right differences in abortion support be explained by sexism? Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 118121. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.044
  33. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 5360.
  34. Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000586
  35. Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2943
  36. Horowitz, M., Yaworsky, W., & Kickham, K. (2014). Whither the blank slate? A report on the reception of evolutionary biological ideas among sociological theorists. Sociological Spectrum, 34, 489509. DOI: 10.1080/02732173.2014.947451
  37. Hyland, M. E., Lewith, G. T., & Westoby, C. (2003). Developing a measure of attitudes: the holistic complementary and alternative medicine questionnaire. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 11, 3338. DOI: 10.1016/S0965-2299(02)00113-9
  38. Jack, A. I., Friedman, J. P., Boyatzis, R. E., & Taylor, S. N. (2016). Why do you believe in God? Relationships between religious belief, analytic thinking, mentalizing and moral concern. PLOS ONE, 11, e0149989. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149989
  39. Johnson, S. B., Park, H. S., Gross, C. P., & Yu, J. B. (2018). Complementary medicine, refusal of conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA Oncology. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2487
  40. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1982). Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404416. DOI: 10.1177/002224378201900402
  41. Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167208. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12407
  42. Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 143. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12244
  43. Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Cohen, G. L., Gastil, J., & Slovic, P. (2010). Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 501516. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-009-9201-0
  44. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 5486. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2016.2
  45. Kennedy, J. (2019). Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: An analysis of national-level data. European Journal of Public Health. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz004
  46. Keshet, Y. (2009). The untenable boundaries of biomedical knowledge: epistemologies and rhetoric strategies in the debate over evaluating complementary and alternative medicine. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 13, 131155. DOI: 10.1177/1363459308099681
  47. Knutti, R., & Rogelj, J. (2015). The legacy of our CO2 emissions: A clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics. Climatic Change, 133, 361373. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1340-3
  48. Komaroff, E. (1997). Effect of simultaneous violations of essential tau-equivalence and uncorrelated error on coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 337348. DOI: 10.1177/01466216970214004
  49. Legare, C. H., Opfer, J. E., Busch, J. T. A., & Shtulman, A. (2018). A field guide for teaching evolution in the social sciences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 257268. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.01.002
  50. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLOS ONE, 8, e75637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
  51. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399404. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1720
  52. Lindeman, M. (2011). Biases in intuitive reasoning and belief in complementary and alternative medicine. Psychology & Health, 26, 371382. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903440707
  53. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151173. DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
  54. Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 290298. DOI: 10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8
  55. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
  56. Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., Srivastava, S., Cohen, A. B., & Miller, D. T. (2012). The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement. Political Psychology, 33, 275299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00875.x
  57. Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., & Wagenfeld, M. O. (1978). Notes from the cancer underground: Participation in the Laetrile movement. Social Science & Medicine, 12, 3137. DOI: 10.1016/0271-7123(78)90020-2
  58. Mazur, A. (2004). Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics and the Life Sciences, 23, 5561. DOI: 10.2990/1471-5457(2004)23[55:BADIE]2.0.CO;2
  59. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765766. DOI: 10.1126/science.1126746
  60. Miller, L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1999). Beliefs about responsibility and improvement associated with liberal-conservative justice beliefs. Psychological Reports, 84, 329338. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.84.1.329
  61. Mooney, C. (2011, June). The science of why we don’t believe science. Retrieved from http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/denial-science-chris-mooney
  62. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
  63. Pew Research Center. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2015/01/PI_ScienceandSociety_Report_012915.pdf
  64. Porter, C. (2013). Liberalism, optimism, and utopia. International Trade & Business Law Review, 16, 555.
  65. Rabinowitz, M., Latella, L., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2016, 07). Beliefs about childhood vaccination in the United States: Political ideology, false consensus, and the illusion of uniqueness. PLOS ONE, 11, e0158382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158382
  66. Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173184. DOI: 10.1177/01466216970212006
  67. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 136. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  68. Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M., & van der Lee, R. (2018). Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 384405. DOI: 10.1177/0146167217741314
  69. Schlenker, B. R., Chambers, J. R., & Le, B. M. (2012, April). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research In Personality, 46, 127146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009
  70. Scott, A. (1998). Homoeopathy as a feminist form of medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 191214. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.00097
  71. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423428. DOI: 10.1037/a0025391
  72. Shermer, M. (2013, January). The liberals’ war on science. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-liberals-war-on-science
  73. Shtulman, A., & McCallum, K. (2014). Cognitive reflection predicts science understanding. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36.
  74. Smith, A., Yarwood, J., & Salisbury, D. M. (2007). Tracking mothers’ attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996–2006. Vaccine, 25, 39964002. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.071
  75. Stagnaro, M. N., Ross, R. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Cross-cultural support for a link between analytic thinking and disbelief in God: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom. Judgment and Decision Making, 14, 179186.
  76. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29, 581593. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617741719
  77. Tom, J. C. (2018). Social origins of scientific deviance: Examining creationism and global warming skepticism. Sociological Perspectives, 61, 341360. DOI: 10.1177/0731121417710459
  78. Van Assche, J., Koç, Y., & Roets, A. (2019). Religiosity or ideology? On the individual differences predictors of sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 191197. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.016
  79. Von Hippel, W., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Do ideologically driven scientific agendas impede the understanding and acceptance of evolutionary principles in social psychology? In J. T. Crawford & L. Jussim (Eds.), Politics of social psychology (pp. 1735). Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9781315112619-2
  80. Wagner-Egger, P., Delouvée, S., Gauvrit, N., & Dieguez, S. (2018). Creationism and conspiracism share a common teleological bias. Current Biology, 28, R867R868. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.072
  81. Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). Science denial across the political divide. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 972980. DOI: 10.1177/1948550617731500
  82. Watts, E., Hossfeld, U., Tolstikova, I., & Levit, G. S. (2017). Beyond borders: on the influence of the creationist movement on the educational landscape in the USA and Russia. Theory in Biosciences, 136, 3148. DOI: 10.1007/s12064-016-0238-6
  83. West, R. (1988). Jurisprudence and gender. University of Chicago Law Review, 55, 172. DOI: 10.2307/1599769
  84. Whitney, C. G., Zhou, F., Singleton, J., & Schuchat, A. (2014). Benefits from immunization during the vaccines for children program era-United States, 1994–2013. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 63, 352355.
  85. Williams, J. C. (1989). Deconstructing gender. Michigan Law Review, 87, 797845. DOI: 10.2307/1289293
  86. Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow. Psychological Science, 23, 11761185. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612441004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.99 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2019
|
Accepted on: Mar 24, 2020
|
Published on: Apr 30, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Stephan Lewandowsky, Jan K. Woike, Klaus Oberauer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.