Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Behavioral Constraint Legibility Under Concealment Cover

Behavioral Constraint Legibility Under Concealment

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Barker, R. G. (1963). The stream of behavior: Explorations of its structure and content. Appleton-Century-Crofts. 10.1037/11177-000
  2. Bezdek, M. A., Nguyen, T. T., Hall, C. S., Braver, T. S., Bobick, A. F., & Zacks, J. M. (2023). The multi-angle extended three-dimensional activities (META) stimulus set: A tool for studying event cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 55(7), 36293644. 10.3758/s13428-022-01980-8
  3. Christensen, J. F., Schmidt, E.-M., Frieler, K., Smith-Chase, R. A., Sancho-Escanero, L., Michalareas, G., Ullén, F., & Cross, E. S. (2025). Aesthetic appeal of dance actions depends on expressivity, liveness and audience characteristics. Cognition, 263, 106152. 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106152
  4. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181204. 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
  5. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485507. 10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
  6. Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198786849.001.0001
  7. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127138. 10.1038/nrn2787
  8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
  10. Jang, S. H., & Pollick, F. E. (2011). Experience influences brain mechanisms of watching dance. Dance Research, 29(2), 352377. 10.3366/drs.2011.0024
  11. Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 7279. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004
  12. Lee, H., Ashwell, C., Sperling, M., Rai, L., & Orgs, G. (2025). Engaged and confused: Aesthetic appreciation of live and screened contemporary dance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 10.1037/aca0000727
  13. Monroy, C., & Wagner, L. (2023). Finding structure in modern dance. Cognitive Science, 47(11), e13375. 10.1111/cogs.13375
  14. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 2838. 10.1037/h0035584
  15. Opacic, T., Stevens, C. J., & Tillmann, B. (2009). Unspoken knowledge: Implicit learning of structured human dance movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 15701577. 10.1037/a0017244
  16. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133140. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006
  17. Reason, M., & Reynolds, D. (2010). Kinesthesia, empathy, and related pleasures: An inquiry into audience experiences of watching dance. Dance Research Journal, 42(2), 4975. 10.1017/S0149767700001030
  18. Reason, M., Jola, C., Kay, R., Reynolds, D., Kauppi, J.-P., Grosbras, M.-H., Tohka, J., & Pollick, F. E. (2016). Spectators’ aesthetic experience of sound and movement in dance performance: A transdisciplinary investigation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 4255. 10.1037/a0040032
  19. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(4), 585615. 10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.585
  20. Stevens, C. J., Schubert, E., Morris, R. H., Frear, M., Chen, J., Healey, S., Schoknecht, C., & Hansen, S. (2009). Cognition and the temporal arts: Investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(9), 800813. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.06.001
  21. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.
  22. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
  23. Warren, W. H. Jr. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358389. 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
  24. Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22(158), 209212. 10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953
  25. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 321. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3
  26. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind–brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273293. 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.515 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 43
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 3, 2026
Published on: Aug 19, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Assaf Benchetrit, Liliya Benchetrit, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.