Repeating Task-Irrelevant Contexts Does Not Bias Task Choice and Performance in Voluntary Task Switching

Elena Benini; David Dignath; Moritz Schiltenwolf; Iring Koch; Andrea M. Philipp; Andrea Kiesel

doi:10.5334/joc.512

Repeating Task-Irrelevant Contexts Does Not Bias Task Choice and Performance in Voluntary Task Switching

Journal of Cognition

Volume 9 (2026): Issue 1

By: Elena Benini , David Dignath , Moritz Schiltenwolf , Iring Koch , Andrea M. Philipp and Andrea Kiesel

Open Access

|Aug 2026

Allport, A. D., & Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273–296). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198524694.003.0016
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Altmann, E. M. (2011). Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 935–951. 10.1037/a0022931
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arrington, C. M. (2008). The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 991–997. 10.3758/MC.36.5.991
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–615. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(4), 683–702. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.683
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arrington, C. M., & Weaver, S. M. (2015). Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 664–679. 10.1080/17470218.2014.961935
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arrington, C. M., Weaver, S. M., & Pauker, R. L. (2010). Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 1060–1067. 10.1037/a0019646
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2022). Contextual features of the cue enter episodic bindings in task switching. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 1–17. 10.5334/joc.220
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2023). Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(8), 1872–1888. 10.1177/17470218221128546
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benini, E., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2024). Repetition costs in task switching are not equal to cue switching costs: evidence from a cue-independent context. Psychological Research, 88(3), 910–920. 10.1007/s00426-023-01904-x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 1–38. 10.5334/joc.72
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chiu, Y. C., Fröber, K., & Egner, T. (2020). Item-specific priming of voluntary task switches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(4), 434–441. 10.1037/xhp0000725
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demanet, J., & Liefooghe, B. (2014). Component processes in voluntary task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(5), 843–860. 10.1080/17470218.2013.836232
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demanet, J., Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2010). Voluntary task switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(3), 387–393. 10.3758/PBR.17.3.387
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dreisbach, G., & Fröber, K. (2019). On how to be flexible (or not): Modulation of the stability-flexibility balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 3–9. 10.1177/0963721418800030
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dreisbach, G., & Mendl, J. (2024). Flexibility as a matter of context, effort, and ability: evidence from the task-switching paradigm. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 55, 101348. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101348
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1540–1546. 10.1037/a0024077
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). Keep flexible – Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Cognition, 162, 48–53. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fröber, K., Jurczyk, V., & Dreisbach, G. (2022). Keep flexible—Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(9), 1249–1262. 10.1037/xlm0001104
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., Koch, I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Voluntary Selection of Task Sets Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(3), 388–398. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.388
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C. G., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. M. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2017). How perception guides action: Figure-ground segmentation modulates integration of context features into S-R episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 43(11), 1720–1729. 10.1037/xlm0000403
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hazeltine, E. (2024). What are we measuring when we measure task switch costs? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 56, 101352. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101352
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2139–2154. 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Janczyk, M., Giesen, C. G., Moeller, B., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2023). Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: a multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs. Psychological Research, 87(4), 1012–1042. 10.1007/s00426-022-01705-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jurczyk, V., Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2021). Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching in different reward contexts? Acta Psychologica, 217. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103312
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jurczyk, V., Mittelstädt, V., & Fröber, K. (2021). Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice? Psychological Research, 85(3), 1066–1083. 10.1007/s00426-020-01297-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kessler, Y., Shencar, Y., & Meiran, N. (2009). Choosing to switch: Spontaneous task switching despite associated behavioral costs. Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 120–128. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. 10.1037/a0019842
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(2), 488–492. 10.3758/BF03196511
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I. (2005). Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 107–112. 10.3758/BF03196354
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I. (2008). Instruction effects in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(2), 448–452. 10.3758/PBR.15.2.448
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I., & Allport, A. D. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 433–444. 10.3758/BF03193420
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I., Frings, C., & Schuch, S. (2018). Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Psychological Research, 82(3), 570–579. 10.1007/s00426-017-0847-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I., & Kiesel, A. (2022). Task switching: Cognitive control in sequential multitasking. In I. Koch, A. Kiesel, L. Johannsen, & H. Müller (Eds.), Handbook of human multitasking (pp. 85–144). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-04760-2_3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583. 10.1037/bul0000144
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2024). Investigating the influence of salience on distractor-response binding. Visual Cognition, 32(9–10), 1084–1097. 10.1080/13506285.2024.2416720
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liefooghe, B., Demanet, J., & Vandierendonck, A. (2009). Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 850–857. 10.1080/17470210802570994
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 575–599. 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayr, U., & Bell, T. (2006). On how to be unpredictable. Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17(9), 774–780. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01781.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 362–372. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77(3), 249–259. 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mendl, J., Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2024). Flexibility by association? No evidence for an influence of cue–transition associations on voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50(3), 313–328. 10.1037/xhp0001186
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mittelstädt, V., Dignath, D., Schmidt-Ott, M., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching. Psychological Research, 82(1), 78–91. 10.1007/s00426-017-0911-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mittelstädt, V., Mackenzie, I. G., Braun, D. A., & Arrington, C. M. (2024). Reactive and proactive control processes in voluntary task choice. Memory & Cognition, 52(2), 417–429. 10.3758/s13421-023-01470-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment. Memory & Cognition, 46, 699–715. 10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(12), 1529–1548. 10.1037/xhp0000690
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Monno, I., Dahlinger, P., Miller, J., Neumann, G., & Kiesel, A. (2025). Identifying individual cost-balancing strategies when self-organizing task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 51(8), 1063–1084. 10.1037/xhp0001326
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Monno, I., Spitzer, M., Miller, J., Dignath, D., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self- Organized Task Switching. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 8. 10.5334/joc.137
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Monsell, S. (2017). Task set regulation. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control (pp. 29–49). Wiley. 10.1002/9781118920497.ch2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 493–516. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31(3), 327–342. 10.3758/BF03194391
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2024). Bayesfactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs. BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs. https://richarddmorey.github.io/BayesFactor/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orr, J. M., & Weissman, D. H. (2011). Succumbing to bottom-up biases on task choice predicts increased switch costs in the voluntary task switching paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(FEB), 1–9. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00031
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 316–322. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qiu, R., & Mo, Y. (2024). Expanding the boundaries: investigating the integration of contextual information across a spectrum of inter-trial variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494698
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022a). Inter-trial variability of context influences the binding structure in a stimulus-response episode. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 1–13. 10.5334/joc.215
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022b). Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus–response episodes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(4), 1264–1285. 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. 10.1037//0096-3445.124.2.207
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. https://www.rstudio.com/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schiltenwolf, M., Dignath, D., & Hazeltine, E. (2024). Binding of response-independent task rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(4), 1821–1832. 10.3758/s13423-024-02465-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmalbrock, P., Liesefeld, H. R., & Frings, C. (2023). Increased display complexity reveals effects of salience in action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(10), 1345–1359. 10.1037/xhp0001151
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 343–367. 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2015). Learning a nonmediated route for response selection in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 837–851. 10.3758/s13421-015-0507-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Singh, T., Moeller, B., Koch, I., & Frings, C. (2018). May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(5), 1143–1156. 10.3758/s13414-018-1498-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. https://cran.r-project.org/package=afex
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Siqi-Liu, A., & Egner, T. (2020). Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(4), 757–782. 10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vandierendonck, A., Demanet, J., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2012). A chain-retrieval model for voluntary task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 241–283. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. 10.1037/a0019791
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wylie, G., & Allport, A. D. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.” Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 212–233. 10.1007/s004269900003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.512 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 40 - 40

Submitted on: Feb 19, 2026

Accepted on: Jul 17, 2026

Published on: Aug 5, 2026

Published by: Ubiquity Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

Voluntary task switching,

feature binding,

episodic retrieval,

context,

adaptive procedure

© 2026 Elena Benini, David Dignath, Moritz Schiltenwolf, Iring Koch, Andrea M. Philipp, Andrea Kiesel, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 9 (2026): Issue 1