Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Verb Speed on the Processing of Goal-Oriented Visual Scenes Cover

The Impact of Verb Speed on the Processing of Goal-Oriented Visual Scenes

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Examples of the Four Versions of the Picture Stimuli.

Note. The panels correspond to the sentence pair ‘The child scurried/toddled to the tree’, standing for the four image versions: A) Single scene, left Goal, B) Single scene, right Goal, C) Double scene, left Goal, D) Double scene, right Goal.

Table 1

Fixation Coverage of Each Interest Area (IA) across Conditions (Verb Speed × Scene) in Experiment 1.

SCENEVERB SPEEDAGENTPATHGOAL
SingleFast315 (98.4%)132 (41.2%)307 (95.9%)
SingleSlow316 (98.8%)115 (35.9%)306 (95.6%)
DoubleFast312 (97.5%)43 (13.4%)286 (89.4%)
DoubleSlow314 (98.1%)45 (14.1%)296 (92.5%)

[i] Note. The table shows the number and proportion of trials in which the IA was fixated, averaged across participants. Each condition included 320 trials (40 participants × 8 items per condition).

Figure 2

Average Total Dwell Times in Experiment 1.

Note. Violin plots show the distribution of the total dwell times on the IAs in single scenes (upper panel) and double scenes (lower panel) calculated across the whole trial starting from sentence onset. Red dots stand for the mean and horizontal lines for the median.

Table 2

Significance Tests for LMER Models in Experiment 1 (Wide Time Window).

EFFECTAGENT MODELPATH MODELGOAL MODEL
dfχ²pdfχ²pdfχ²p
Verb Speed10.69.40810.32.56911.12.290
Scene10.04.835127.12<.001180.61<.001
Verb Frequency16.46.01114.55.03310.51.475
Verb Duration11.83.17612.44.11911.52.218
Verb Speed × Scene10.70.40412.45.11810.63.427
Figure 3

Grand Averages of the Proportions of Looks to the IAs across the Trial Time Starting from Sentence Onset in Experiment 1.

Note. The mean verb onset was 505 ms (SD = 64, range 395–655 ms) and Goal phrase onset was 1091 ms (SD = 82 ms, range 875–1294 ms). Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 4

Density Plot of the Goal–Agent Fixation Difference in Experiment 1.

Table 3

Summary of GAMM Results Predicting Goal–Agent fixation difference of Experiment 1.

A. PARAMETRIC COEFFICIENTS
PREDICTORESTIMATESEtp
(Intercept)–0.2290.297–0.771.441
Condition (Fast Double)–1.3510.287–4.712<.001***
Condition (Slow Double)–1.3450.394–3.412<.001***
Condition (Slow Single)–0.3360.394–0.853.394
B. SMOOTH TERMS
SMOOTH TERMEdfRef. dfFp
s(Time): Condition (Fast Single)6.6697.5878.419<.001***
s(Time): Condition (Fast Double)7.1568.0005.282<.001***
s(Time): Condition (Slow Double)7.0637.9394.961<.001***
s(Time): Condition (Slow Single)6.3587.3136.652<.001***
s(Time, Subject) (random effect)247.905368.0002.295<.001***
s(Time, Item) (random effect)160.550284.0001.352<.001***
s(Verb Frequency)1.0211.0283.163.077
s(Verb Duration)1.0011.0010.882.348

[i] Note. Model fit: Adjusted R² = .131; Deviance explained = 13.5%; fREML = 223,790; Scale estimate = 41.657; n = 99,502. Edf = estimated degrees of freedom. Ref. df = reference degrees of freedom. Significance codes: *** p < .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05.

Figure 5

GAMM-estimated Smooths and Condition Differences in Experiment 1.

Note: The smooths for the effect of Condition on Goal–Agent fixation difference (difference between the empirical logits of Goal and Agent) are on the left panel. GAMM-derived difference curves for the effect of Verb Speed on Goal–Agent fixation difference are shown for single scenes (middle panel) and double scenes (right panel). The x-axis is time in milliseconds, with 0 ms marking the onset of the audio.

Table 4

Fixation Coverage of Each IA across Conditions (Verb Speed × Scene) in Experiment 2.

SCENEVERB SPEEDAGENTPATHGOAL
SingleFast315 (98.4%)203 (63.4%)318 (99.4%)
SingleSlow317 (99.1%)210 (65.6%)315 (98.4%)
DoubleFast316 (98.8%)60 (18.8%)305 (95.3%)
DoubleSlow319 (99.7%)75 (23.4%)306 (95.6%)

[i] Note. The table shows the number and proportion of trials in which the IA was fixated, averaged across participants. Each condition included 320 trials (40 participants × 8 items per condition).

Figure 6

Average Total Dwell Times in Experiment 2.

Note. Violin plots show the distribution of the total dwell times on the IAs in single scenes (upper panel) and double scenes (lower panel) calculated across the whole trial starting from sentence onset. Red dots stand for the mean and horizontal lines for the median.

Table 5

Significance Tests for LMER Models in Experiment 2 (Wide Time Window).

AGENT MODELPATH MODELGOAL MODEL
EFFECTdfχ²pdfχ²pdfχ²p
Verb Speed12.83.09210.89.34612.73.099
Scene13.18.075138.18<.001121.30<.001
Verb Frequency14.45.03510.39.53110.53.465
Verb Duration10.37.54010.47.49110.51.474
Verb Speed × Scene12.40.12110.51.473110.03.002
Figure 7

Estimated Marginal Means (EMMs) of the Total Dwell Time on Goal by Verb Speed and Scene.

Note. EMMs are based on the linear mixed-effects model. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 8

Grand Averages of the Proportions of Looks to the IAs across the Trial Time Starting from Sentence Onset in Experiment 2.

Note. The mean verb onset was 552 ms (SD = 78, range 399–690 ms), Path phrase onset was 1306 ms (SD = 135 ms, range 1015–1564 ms), and Goal phrase onset was 2406 ms (SD = 152 ms, range 2159–2735 ms). Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 9

Density Plot of the Variable Goal–Agent Fixation Difference in Experiment 2.

Table 6

Summary of GAMM Results Predicting Goal–Agent Fixation Difference in Experiment 2.

A. PARAMETRIC COEFFICIENTS
PREDICTORESTIMATESEtp
(Intercept)–0.7240.250–2.892.004**
Condition (Fast Double)–0.9290.266–3.488<.001***
Condition (Slow Double)–1.0500.347–3.022.003**
Condition (Slow Single)0.5030.3471.448.148
B. SMOOTH TERMS
SMOOTH TERMEdfRef. dfFp
s(Time): Condition (Fast Single)4.1155.0197.383<.001***
s(Time): Condition (Fast Double)7.9798.6589.020<.001***
s(Time): Condition (Slow Double)6.4377.5064.426<.001***
s(Time): Condition (Slow Single)7.2338.16410.438<.001***
s(Time, Subject) (random effect)189.889359.0001.320<.001***
s(Time, Item) (random effect)119.171284.0000.801<.001***
s(Verb Frequency)1.5331.6813.183.121
s(Verb Duration)1.5961.7540.488.619

[i] Note. Model fit: Adjusted R² = .110; Deviance explained = 11.2%; fREML = 302,250; Scale estimate = 42.842; n = 136,588. Edf = estimated degrees of freedom. Ref. df = reference degrees of freedom. Significance codes: *** p < .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05.

Figure 10

GAMM-estimated Smooths and Condition Differences in Experiment 2.

Note. The smooths for the effect of Condition on Goal–Agent fixation difference (difference between the empirical logits of Goal and Agent) are on the left panel. GAMM-derived difference curves for the effect of Verb Speed on Goal–Agent fixation difference are shown for single scenes (middle panel) and double scenes (right panel). The x-axis is time in milliseconds, with 0 ms marking the onset of the audio.

PREDICTORSAGENTPATHGOAL
EST.SEtpEST.SEtpEST.SEtp
(Intercept)5.960.4214.13<0.0014.9104710.38<0.0017.550.3820.10<0.001
Verb Speed [Slow]0.060.070.830.406–0.050.08–0.570.569–0.070.07–1.060.287
Scene [Double]0.010.040.210.835–0.580.11–5.37<0.001–0.430.05–9.15<0.001
Verb Frequency0.110.042.680.0080.090.042.150.032–0.030.04–0.720.474
Verb Duration0.000.001.370.1710.000.001.560.119–0.000.00–1.250.213
Verb Speed [Slow] × Scene [Double]–0.050.06—0.830.4040.240.151.570.1180.050.070.790.427
Random Effects
σ20.310.380.33
τ000.03participant0.01participant0.05participant
0.02item0.00item0.02item
ICC0.140.16
N40participant40participant40participant
32item32item32item
Observations12573351195
Marginal R2/Conditional R20.026/0.1650.126/NA0.101/0.245
PREDICTORSAGENTPATHGOAL
EST.SEtpEST.SEtpEST.SEtp
(Intercept)5.630.4014.18<0.0014.900.4710.52<0.0017.430.3422.02<0.001
Verb Speed [Slow]0.050.070.750.451–0.070.08–0.940346–0.100.06–1.560.119
Scene [Double]0.080.051.490.136–0.590.11–5.54<0.001–0.410.05–8.34<0.001
Verb Frequency0.080.042.040.0420.090.042.290.023–0.040.03–1.280.202
Verb Duration0.000.002.010.0450.000.001.570.118–0.000.00–1.050.293
Verb Speed [Slow] × Scene [Double]–0.040.07—0.520.6060.270.151.790.0740.090.071.240.215
Random Effects
σ20.390.35035
τ000.04participant0.01participant0.05participant
0.02item0.00item0.01item
ICC0.130.14
N40participant40participant40participant
32item32item32item
Observations11583281149
Marginal R2/Conditional R20.019/0.1440.134/NA0.084/0.213
PREDICTORSAGENTPATHGOAL
EST.SEtpEST.SEtpEST.SEtp
(Intercept)6.880.3221.21<0.0015.800.5510.61<0.0017.100.3918.39<0.001
Verb Speed [Slow]–0.100.06–1.700.0890.080.090.950.3440.110.071.670.095
Scene [Double]0.070.041.780.075–0.650.10–6.31<0.001–0.220.05–4.64<0.001
Verb Frequency0.070.032.190.0290.030.050.630.529–0.030.04–0.730.463
Verb Duration0.000.000.610.5390.000.000.690.4900.000.000.720.472
Verb Speed [Slow] × Scene [Double]0.090.061.550.121–0.100.14–0.720.473–0.210.07–3.170.002
Random Effects
σ20.280.460.34
τ000.03participant0.09participant0.06participant
0.01item0.02item0.02item
ICC0.130.200.18
N40participant40participant40participant
32item32item32item
Observations12675481244
Marginal R2/Conditional R20.025/0.1530.142/0.3110.067/0.237
PREDICTORSAGENTPATHGOAL
EST.SEtpEST.SEtpEST.SEtp
(Intercept)6.700.3618.61<0.0015.760.4811.93<0.0016.960.3619.13<0.001
Verb Speed [Slow]–0.080.07–1.240.2140.060.080.810.4180.140.072.170.030
Scene [Double]0.100.052.030.042–0.650.11–6.09<0.001–0.200.05–4.17<0.001
Verb Frequency0.050.041.340.1800.030.040.680.495–0.020.04–0.700.485
Verb Duration0.000.000.630.5270.000.000.9003700.000.000.900.370
Verb Speed [Slow] × Scene [Double]0.100,071.420.156–0.080.14–0.530.597–0.260.07–3.78<0.001
Random Effects
σ20.360.480.35
τ000.03participant0.09participant0.06participant
0.01item0.01item0.01item
ICC0.110.170.18
N40participant40participant40participant
32item32item32item
Observations12065331214
Marginal R2/Conditional R20.019/0.1290.134/0.2780.071/0.241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.510 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 39
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 14, 2026
Published on: Aug 3, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Piia Taremaa, Nele Ots, Ann Veismann, Laura J. Speed, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.