Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Imaginative Thought Cover
Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Alicke, M. D., Buckingham, J., Zell, E., & Davis, T. (2008). Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 13711381. 10.1177/0146167208321594
  2. Beck, S. R., Riggs, K. J., & Gorniak, S. L. (2009). Relating developments in children’s counterfactual thinking and executive functions. Thinking and Reasoning, 15, 337354. 10.1080/13546780903135904
  3. Beck, S. R., Robinson, E. J., Carroll, D. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2006). Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Child Development, 77, 413426. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00879.x
  4. Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). ‘It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage’: Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montreal QC, Canada (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 114. 10.1145/3173574.3173951
  5. Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T. A., & Coleman, J. (1996). Rape and accident counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(12), 10421067. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01124.x
  6. Brockbank, E., Yang, J., Govil, M., Fan, J. E., & Gerstenberg, T. (2024). Without his cookies, he’s just a monster: a counterfactual simulation model of social explanation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 46). 10.31234/osf.io/3wzbk
  7. Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 254. 10.7551/mitpress/5756.001.0001
  8. Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual Thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135157. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
  9. Byrne, R. M. J. (2019). Counterfactuals in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Evidence from Human Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-19, 62766282. 10.24963/ijcai.2019/876
  10. Byrne, R. M. J. (2024). How people think about impossibilities. Memory & Cognition, 52, 182196. 10.3758/s13421-023-01454-y
  11. Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2020). If and or: real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 760780.
  12. Byrne, R. M. J., & McEleney, A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 13181331. 10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1318
  13. Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 27, 726740. 10.3758/BF03211565
  14. Byrne, R. M. J., & Timmons, S. (2018). Moral hindsight for good actions and the effects of imagined alternatives to reality. Cognition, 178, 8291. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.010
  15. Catellani, P., & Covelli V. (2013). The strategic use of counterfactual communication in politics. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol, 32(4), 480489. 10.1177/0261927X13495548
  16. Celar, L., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2023). How people reason with counterfactual and causal explanations for Artificial Intelligence decisions in familiar and unfamiliar domains. Memory & Cognition, 51, 14811496. 10.3758/s13421-023-01407-5
  17. Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353380. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
  18. Dai, X., Keane, M. T., Shalloo, L., Ruelle, E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2026). Counterfactual explanations for decisions by AI decision support systems. In submission.
  19. Deighan, L. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2025). On the different content of counterfactual and causal explanations. Thinking & Reasoning, 137. 10.1080/13546783.2025.2539226
  20. De Brigard, F., & Parikh, N. (2019). Episodic counterfactual thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 5966. 10.1177/0963721418806512
  21. De Brigard, F., Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Coming to grips with the past effect of repeated simulation on the perceived plausibility of episodic counterfactual thoughts. Psychological Science, 24(7), 13291334. 10.1177/0956797612468163
  22. De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684687. 10.1126/science.1128356
  23. de Vega, M., Urrutia, M., & Riffo, B. (2007). Cancelling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives. Memory & Cognition, 35, 14101421. 10.3758/BF03193611
  24. Dinh, P. P. N., & Danks, D. (2021). Causal pluralism in philosophy: Empirical challenges and alternative proposals. Philosophy of Science, 88(5), 761772. 10.1086/714878
  25. Dixon, J., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2011) Counterfactual thinking about exceptional actions. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 13171331. 10.3758/s13421-011-0101-4
  26. Dodge, J., Liao, Q. V., Zhang, Y, Bellamy, R. K. E., & Dugan, C. (2019). Explaining Models: An Empirical Study of How Explanations Impact Fairness Judgment. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray, California (IUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275285. 10.1145/3301275.3302310
  27. Drayton, S., Turley-Ames, K. J., & Guajardo, N. R. (2011). Counterfactual thinking and false belief: The role of executive function. Journal of ExperimentalChild Psychology, 108, 532548. 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.007
  28. Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13, 331338. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.x
  29. Egan, S., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2012). Inferences from counterfactual threats and promises. Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 227235. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000147
  30. Einhorn H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 319. 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.3
  31. Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2020). The suppression of inferences from counterfactual conditionals. Cognitive Science, 44(4). 10.1111/cogs.12827
  32. Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2021). How people keep track of what is real and what is imagined: The epistemic status of counterfactual alternatives to reality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 547570. 10.1037/xlm0000965
  33. Evans, J. S. B., & Over, D. E. (2004). If: Supposition, pragmatics, and dual processes. Oxford University Press.
  34. Feldman, G., Kutscher, L., & Yay, T. (2020). Omission and commission in judgment and decision making: Understanding and linking action-inaction effects using the concept of normality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(8), e12557. 10.1111/spc3.12557
  35. Feeney, A., Travers, E., O’Connor, E., Beck, S. R., & McCormack, T. (2017). Knowing when to hold ‘em: regret and the relation between missed opportunities and risk taking in children, adolescents and adults. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 608615. 10.1080/02699931.2017.1326373
  36. Ferguson, H., & Jayes, L. (2018). Plausibility and perspective influence the processing of counterfactual narratives. Discourse Processes, 55, 166186. 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1330032
  37. Ferrante, D., Girotto, V., Straga, M., & Walsh, C. (2013). Improving the past and the future: A temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 2327. 10.1037/a0027947
  38. Frosch, C., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2012). Causal conditionals and counterfactuals. Acta Psychologica, 141(1), 5466. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.001
  39. Gendler, T. S. (2000). The puzzle of imaginative resistance. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(2), 5581. 10.2307/2678446
  40. Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, N. D., Lagnado, D. A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2021). A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical events. Psychological review, 128(5), 936. 10.1037/rev0000281
  41. Gerstenberg, T., Peterson, M. F., Goodman, N. D., Lagnado, D. A., & Tennenbaum, J. B. (2017). Eye-tracking causality. Psychological Science, 2812(12), 17311744. 10.1177/0956797617713053
  42. Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychological review, 102(2), 379. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379
  43. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution. Psychological review, 105(3), 602. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.602
  44. Girotto, V., Ferrante, D., Pighin, S., & Gonzalez, M. (2007). Postdecisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers. Psychological Science, 18(6), 510515. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01931.x
  45. Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P., & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78(1–3), 111133. 10.1016/0001-6918(91)90007-M
  46. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2010). Causal pluralism. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, & P. Menzies (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326337. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279739.003.0017
  47. Gonzalez, C., Dana, J., Koshino, H., & Just, M. (2005). The framing effect and risky decisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(1), 120. 10.1016/j.joep.2004.08.004
  48. Goodwin, G. P. (2017). Is morality unified, and does this matter for moral reasoning? In Bonnefone, J. P. & Tremoliere, B. (Eds.), Moral inferences (pp. 1744). Psychology Press.
  49. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 1131). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/13091-001
  50. Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2012). Two Minds Vs. Two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 405423. 10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5
  51. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 21052108. 10.1126/science.1062872
  52. Guajardo, N. R., Parker, J., & Turley-Ames, K. (2009). Associations among false belief understanding, counterfactual reasoning, and executive function. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 681702. 10.1348/026151008X357886
  53. Gubbins, E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2014). Dual processes of emotion and reason in judgments about moral dilemmas. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 245268. 10.1080/13546783.2013.877400
  54. Gürçay, B., & Baron, J. (2017). Challenges for the sequential two-system model of moral judgement. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(1), 4980. 10.1080/13546783.2016.1216011
  55. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814834. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
  56. Hart, H. L. A., & Honor, A. M. (1959). Causation in the Law. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
  57. Henne, P., Niemi, L., Pinillos, Á., De Brigard, F., & Knobe, J. (2019). A Counterfactual Explanation for the Action Effect. Cognition, 190, 157164. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.006
  58. Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., Klein, G., & Litman, J. (2018). Metrics for explainable AI: Challenges and prospects. arXiv:1812.04608. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1812.04608
  59. Hume, D. (1739/1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Original work published 1739]. 10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221
  60. Icard, T. F., Kominsky, J. F., & Knobe, J. (2017). Normality and actual causal strength. Cognition, 161, 8093. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.010
  61. Johnson, S. G., Valenti, J. J., & Keil, F. C. (2019). Simplicity and complexity preferences in causal explanation: An opponent heuristic account. Cognitive Psychology, 113, 101222. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.05.004
  62. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., & Khemlani, S. S. (2023). Human verifications: Computable with truth values outside logic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(40), e2310488120. 10.1073/pnas.2310488120
  63. Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. LEA.
  64. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002) Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646678. 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646
  65. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2007). Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(2), 4546. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.007
  66. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136. 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
  67. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P, Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristis and Biases (pp. 201208). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.015
  68. Karimi, A.-H., Barthe, G., Schölkopf, B., & Valera, I. (2022). A survey of algorithmic recourse: contrastive explanations and consequential recommendations. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(5), Article 95. 29 pages. 10.1145/3527848
  69. Keane, M. T., Kenny, E. M., Delaney, E., & Smyth, B. (2021). If only we had better counterfactual explanations: Five key deficits to rectify in the evaluation of counterfactual XAI techniques. Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 44664474. 10.24963/ijcai.2021/609
  70. Khemlani, S., Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2018). Facts and possibilities: A model-based theory of sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 18871924. 10.1111/cogs.12634
  71. Khemlani, S. S., Sussman, A. B., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2011). Harry potter and the sorcerer’s scope: Latent scope biases in explanatory reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 527535. 10.3758/s13421-010-0028-1
  72. Knauff, M., & Gazzo Castaneda, L. E. (2023). When nomenclature matters: Is the “new paradigm” really a new paradigm for the psychology of reasoning? Thinking & Reasoning, 29(3), 341370. 10.1080/13546783.2021.1990126
  73. Knobe, J. (2010). Person as scientist, person as moralist. Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(4), 315329. 10.1017/S0140525X10000907
  74. Kominsky, J. F., Phillips, J., Gerstenberg, T., Lagnado, D. A., & Knobe, J. (2015). Causal superseding. Cognition, 137, 196209. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.013
  75. Kulakova, E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Understanding counterfactuality: A review of experimental evidence for the dual meaning of counterfactuals. Language and Linguistics Compass, 102(2), 4965. 10.1111/lnc3.12175
  76. Lage, I., Chen, E., He, J., Narayanan, M., Kim, B., Gershman, S., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2019). An evaluation of the human-interpretability of explanation. arXiv:1902.00006.
  77. Lagnado, D. A., Gerstenberg, T., & Zultan, R. I. (2013). Causal responsibility and counterfactuals. Cognitive science, 37(6), 10361073. 10.1111/cogs.12054
  78. Lench, H. C., Domsky, D., Smallman, R., & Darbor, K. E. (2015). Beliefs in moral luck: When and why blame hinges on luck. British Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 272287. 10.1111/bjop.12072
  79. Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. Journal of Philosophy 70, 17(1973), 556567. 10.2307/2025310
  80. Liao, Q. V., & Varshney, K. R. (2021). Human-centered explainable ai (XAI): From algorithms to user experiences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.10790.
  81. Liefgreen, A., & Lagnado, D. A. (2023). Drawing conclusions: Representing and evaluating competing explanations. Cognition, 234, 105382. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105382
  82. Lim, B. Y., Dey, A. K., & Avrahami, D. (2009). Why and Why Not Explanations Improve the Intelligibility of Context-Aware Intelligent Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21192128. 10.1145/1518701.1519023
  83. Liquin, E. G., & Lombrozo, T. (2020). A functional approach to explanation-seeking curiosity. Cognitive Psychology, 119, 101276. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101276
  84. Lucic, A., Haned, H., & de Rijke, M. (2020). Why Does My Model Fail? Contrastive Local Explanations for Retail Forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Barcelona, Spain (FAT* ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9098. 10.1145/3351095.3372824
  85. Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Oxford
  86. Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 147186. 10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340
  87. Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Counterfactual Thinking and Ascriptions of Cause and Preventability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 450463. 10.1037//0022-3514.71.3.450
  88. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588595. 10.1177/0146167295216005
  89. Markman, K. D., & McMullen, M. N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(3), 244267. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0703_04
  90. Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., & Elizaga, R. A. (2008a). Counterfactual thinking, persistence, and performance: a test of the reflection and evaluation model. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol, 44(2), 421428. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.001
  91. Markman, K. D., Mizoguchi, N., & McMullen, M. N. (2008b). “It would have been worse under Saddam:” Implications of counterfactual thinking for beliefs regarding the ethical treatment of prisoners of war. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44(3), 650654. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.005
  92. McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about controllable actions. Memory & Cognition, 28, 10711078. 10.3758/BF03209355
  93. McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Semifactual “Even If” Thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 4167. 10.1080/13546780143000125
  94. McEleney, A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2006). Spontaneous causal and counterfactual thoughts. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 235255. 10.1080/13546780500317897
  95. McGill, A. L., & Klein, J. G. (1993). Contrastive and counterfactual thinking in causal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 897905. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.897
  96. Meder, B., Gerstenberg, T., Hagmayer, Y., & Waldmann, M. R. (2010). Observing and intervening: Rational and heuristic models of causal decision making. The Open Psychology Journal, 3, 119135. 10.2174/1874350101003010119
  97. Mercier, H., Rolison, J. J., Stragà, M., Ferrante, D., Walsh, C. R., & Girotto, V. (2017). Questioning the preparatory function of counterfactual thinking. Memory & cognition, 45, 261269. 10.3758/s13421-016-0660-5
  98. Mill, J. S. (1843/1967). A system of logic raciocentive and inductive. London: Longmans. [Original work published 1843].
  99. Miller, D. T., & Gunasegaram, S. (1990). Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1111. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1111
  100. Miller, S. A. (2009). Children’s understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 749773. 10.1037/a0016854
  101. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial intelligence, 267, 138. 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007
  102. Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2019). People systematically update moral judgments of blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 215. 10.1037/pspa0000137
  103. Moreno-Rios, S., Garcia-Madruga, J., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2008). Semifactual ‘even if’ reasoning, Acta Psychologica, 128, 197209. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.008
  104. Morrison, M., & Roese, N. J. (2011). Regrets of the typical American: Findings from a nationally representative sample. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 576583. 10.1177/1948550611401756
  105. Morsanyi, K., & Byrne, R. M. J. (Eds.). (2019). Thinking, reasoning, and decision making in autism. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351060912
  106. Müller, U., Miller, M. R., Michalczyk, K., & Karapinka, A. (2007). False belief understanding: The influence of person, grammatical mood, counterfactualreasoning and working memory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 615632. 10.1348/026151007X182962
  107. N’gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Mental simulation and causal attribution: When simulating an event does not affect fault assignment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 139162. 10.1006/jesp.1995.1007
  108. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524496.001.0001
  109. Orenes, I., Espino O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2022). Similarities and differences in understanding negative and affirmative counterfactuals and causal aassertions: Evidence from eye-tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(4), 633651. 10.1177/17470218211044085
  110. Orenes, I., García-Madruga, J. A., Gómez-Veiga, I., Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2019). The comprehension of counterfactual conditionals: Evidence from eye-tracking in the visual world paradigm. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1172. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01172
  111. Parkinson, M., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2017a). Counterfactual and semifactual thoughts in moral judgments about failed attempts to harm. Thinking and Reasoning, 23(4), 409448. 10.1080/13546783.2017.1345790
  112. Parkinson, M., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2017b). Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(3), 236252. 10.1017/S1930297500005854
  113. Parkinson, M., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2018). Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(3), 779789.
  114. Pearl, J. (2013). Structural counterfactuals: a brief introduction. Cogniitve Science, 37(6), 977985. 10.1111/cogs.12065
  115. Perner, J., Sprung, M., & Steinkogler, B. (2004). Counterfactual conditionals and false belief: A developmental dissociation. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 179201. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.12.001
  116. Phillips, J., Morris, A., & Cushman, F. (2019). How we know what not to think. Trends in cognitive sciences, 23(12), 10261040. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.007
  117. Pighin, S., Byrne, R. M. J., Ferrante, D., Gonzalez, M., & Girotto, V. (2011). Counterfactual thoughts about experienced, observed, and narrated events. Thinking and Reasoning, 17(2), 197211. 10.1080/13546783.2011.561598
  118. Quillien, T., & Lucas, C. G. (2023). Counterfactuals and the logic of causal selection. Psychological Review. 131(5), 12081234. 10.1037/rev0000428
  119. Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2013). Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 389404. 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010
  120. Rasga, C., Quelhas, A. C., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Children’s reasoning about other’s intentions: False-belief and counterfactual conditional inferences. Cognitive Development, 40, 4659. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.08.007
  121. Rasga, C., Quelhas, A. C., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2017). How children with autism reason about other’s intentions: false-belief and counterfactual inferences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(6), 18061817.
  122. Reyna, V. F., Chick, C. F., Corbin, J. C., & Hsia, A. N. (2013). Developmental reversals in risky decision making: Intelligence agents show larger decision biases than college students. Psychological science, 25(1), 7684. 10.1177/0956797613497022
  123. Riggs, K. J., Peterson, D. M., Robinson, E. J., & Mitchell, P. (1998). Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader difficulty with counterfactuality? Cognitive Development, 13(1), 7390. 10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90021-1
  124. Rim, S., & Summerville, A. (2014). How far to the road not taken? The effect of psychological distance on counterfactual direction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 391440. 10.1177/0146167213513304
  125. Rips, L. J. (1994). The Psychology of Proof. MIT press.
  126. Roese, N. J., & Epstude, K. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new challenges, new insights. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 56, pp. 179. Academic Press. 10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001
  127. Robinson, E. J., & Beck, S. R. (2000). What is difficult about counterfactual reasoning? In P. Mitchell, & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 101119). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  128. Sabo, J. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2017). Imagining wrong: Fictitious contexts mitigate condemnation of harm more than impurity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(1), 134. 10.1037/xge0000251
  129. Santamaria, C., Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 11491154. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1149
  130. Segura, S., Fernandez-Berrocal, P., & Byrne, R. M. (2002). Temporal and causal order effects in thinking about what might have been. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(4), 12951305. 10.1080/02724980244000125
  131. Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 267281. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x
  132. Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. (2015). Causality in thought. Annual review of psychology, 66(1), 223247. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135
  133. Stalnaker, R. C. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In Ifs: Conditionals, belief, decision, chance and time (pp. 4155). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978-94-009-9117-0_2
  134. Stanley, M. L., Dougherty, A. M., Yang, B. W., Henne, P., & De Brigard, F. (2018). Reasons probably won’t change your mind: The role of reasons in revising moral decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(7), 962. 10.1037/xge0000368
  135. Sweeny, K., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). On near misses and completed tasks the nature of relief. Psychological Science, 23(5), 464468. 10.1177/0956797611434590
  136. Tepe, B., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2022). Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change. Memory & Cognition, 50(5), 11031123. 10.3758/s13421-022-01315-0
  137. Timmons, S., Gubbins, E., Almeida, T., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2019). Imagined alternatives to episodic memories of morally good acts. Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(2), 178197. 10.1080/17439760.2019.1689410
  138. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453458. 10.1126/science.7455683
  139. van der Waa, J., Nieuwburg, E., Cremers, A., & Neerincx, M. (2021). Evaluating XAI: A comparison of rule-based and example-based explanations. Artificial Intelligence, 291, 103404. 10.1016/j.artint.2020.103404
  140. Verma, S., Dickerson, J., & Hines, K. (2020). Counterfactual explanations for machine learning: A review. arXiv:2010.10596.
  141. Walsh, C. R., & Byrne, R. M. (2004). Counterfactual thinking: The temporal order effect. Memory & cognition, 32(3), 369378. 10.3758/BF03195831
  142. Walsh, C. R., and Byrne, R. M. J. (2007). The effects of reasons for acting on counterfactual thinking. Thinking and Reasoning, 13, 461483. 10.1080/13546780701382120
  143. Walsh, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2011). The meaning of cause and prevent: The role of causal mechanism. Mind & Language, 26(1), 2152. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01409.x
  144. Warren, G., Byrne, R. M. J., & Keane, M. T. (2024). Categorical and Continuous Features in Counterfactual Explanations of AI Systems. ACM Transactions on Intelligence Systems. 10.1145/3673907
  145. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655684. 10.1111/1467-8624.00304
  146. Wells, G. L., Taylor, B. R., & Turtle, J. W. (1987). The undoing of scenarios. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(3), 421. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.421
  147. Williamson, T. (2018). Counterpossibles. Topoi, 37(3), 357368. 10.1007/s11245-016-9424-x
  148. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103128. 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
  149. Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 1, 82111. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82
  150. Wolff, P., & Thorstad, R. (2017). Force dynamics. The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning, 147167. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.13
  151. Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202214. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005
  152. Zemla, J. C., Sloman, S., Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017). Evaluating everyday explanations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(5), 14881500. 10.3758/s13423-017-1258-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.506 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 34
Submitted on: Mar 5, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2026
Published on: Jul 1, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Ruth M. J. Byrne, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.