Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Different Thoughts in Tacit Coordination and Its Malleability by Interventions Cover

The Role of Different Thoughts in Tacit Coordination and Its Malleability by Interventions

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Example Stimuli and Trial Sequence.

Note. Panel A shows an example of colour and shape image sets shown in a trial. In each trial, a set of four previously-unseen images (either colour or shape) is presented, from which participants try to select the same image. Panel B shows trial sequence.

Figure 2

Effects of Thought Probe Responses on Performance Over Trials.

Note. Hierarchical GAM analysis controlling for block revealed a significant effect of other-focus on performance over trials (χ2(3) = 13.708, p < .001, ΔAIC = 22.21), both for the parametric coefficient referenced to self-focus (Z = 4.605, SE = 0.140, p < .001, estimated coefficient = 0.64) and the nonlinear interaction between other-focus and trial (χ2(3.336) = 19.91, p < .001). For on-task, no significant effect was found (χ2(3) = 3.208, p = .093, ΔAIC = 5.97). Shading represents pointwise 95% confidence intervals. Black horizontal lines in the bottom panel represent log-odds values of 0 (i.e., no difference between estimates for other- and self-focus or on- and off-task), with red lines indicating the trial window of significant difference (self- vs. other-focus: trials 8–66; on- vs. off-task: trials 2–57). Full model outputs are shown in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.

Figure 3

Other-Focus Enhances Coordination Performance.

Note. Hierarchical logistic regression modelling controlling for block (pre- vs. post-intervention) revealed a significantly higher likelihood for dyads to successfully coordinate on trials where both participants were other-focused compared to trials where either participant was self-focused (χ2(1) = 27.04, p < 0.001, ΔAIC = 25.0); “n” represents number of trials included in analysis; error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 4

Coordination Performance Pre- and Post-Intervention.

Note. No significant effect of intervention type on change in performance from pre- to post-intervention was found. Bayes Factor analysis revealed moderate evidence in favor of the null hypothesis (BF10 = 0.22). Top panel shows mean dyad performance. In bottom panel, points represent change in performance for each dyad. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. FAM = focused attention meditation; LKM = loving kindness meditation; NEU = neutral control.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.503 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 31
Submitted on: Apr 4, 2025
Accepted on: May 10, 2026
Published on: May 26, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Lionel Newman, Ming Cao, Susanne Tauber, Marieke van Vugt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.