Have a personal or library account? Click to login
When Do Generics Feel Justifiable? A Registered Report Bridging Key Theories Cover

When Do Generics Feel Justifiable? A Registered Report Bridging Key Theories

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Acuna, B. D., Sanes, J. N., & Donoghue, J. P. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms of transitive inference. Experimental Brain Research, 146(1), 110. 10.1007/s00221-002-1092-y
  2. Arpinon, T., & Espinosa, R. (2023). A practical guide to Registered Reports for economists. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 9(1), 90122. 10.1007/s40881-022-00123-1
  3. Auguie, B., & Antonov, A. (2017). gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for “Grid” Graphics (Version 2.3). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/
  4. Aust, F., Diedenhofen, B., Ullrich, S., & Musch, J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavioural Research, 45, 527535. 10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
  5. Baranger, D. A. A., Finsaas, M. C., Goldstein, B. L., Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., & Olino, T. M. (2023). Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3). 10.1177/25152459231187531
  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Jagan, M., & Davis T. A. (2025). Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods (Version 1.7–4). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Matrix/index.html
  7. Ben-Shachar, M. S., Makowski, D., Lüdecke, D., Patil, I., Wiernik, B. M., Thériault, R., Kelley, K., Stanley, D., Caldwell, A., Burnett, J., Karreth, J., & Waggoner, P. (2025). effectsize: Indices of Effect Size (Version 1.0.1). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/effectsize/index.html
  8. Berio, L., & Musholt, K. (2023). How language shapes our minds: On the relationship between generics, stereotypes and social norms. Mind & Language, 38(4), 944961. 10.1111/mila.12449
  9. Beukeboom, C. J., & Burgers, C. (2019). How stereotypes are shared through language: A review and introduction of the social categories and stereotypes communication (SCSC) framework. Review of Communication Research, 7, 137. 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.017
  10. Bian, L., & Cimpian, A. (2021). Generics about categories and generics about individuals: Same phenomenon or different? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(11), 1836. 10.1037/xlm0001100
  11. Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2016). Stereotypes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 17531794. 10.1093/qje/qjw029
  12. Bosse, A. (2022). Stereotyping and generics. Inquiry, 0(0), 117. 10.1080/0020174X.2022.2074879
  13. Brandone, A. C., Gelman, S. A., & Hedglen, J. (2015). Children’s Developing Intuitions About the Truth Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified Statements. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 711738. 10.1111/cogs.12176
  14. Carlson, G. N. (1995). Truth conditions of generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 224237). University of Chicago Press.
  15. Castroviejo, E., Hernández-Conde, J. V., Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., Ponciano, M., & Vicente, A. (2023). Are Generics Defaults? A Study on the Interpretation of Generics and Universals in 3 Age-Groups of Spanish-Speaking Individuals. Language Learning and Development, 19(3), 275302. 10.1080/15475441.2022.2071715
  16. Cella, F., Marchak, K. A., Bianchi, C., & Gelman, S. A. (2022). Generic Language for Social and Animal Kinds: An Examination of the Asymmetry Between Acceptance and Inferences. Cognitive Science, 46(12), e13209. 10.1111/cogs.13209
  17. Cilleruelo, G., Allaway, E., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2025). Generics are puzzling. Can language models find the missing piece? In O. Rambow, L. Wanner, M. Apidianaki, H. Al-Khalifa, B. D. Eugenio, & S. Schockaert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 65716588). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-main.438/
  18. Cimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2010). Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 14521482. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01126.x
  19. Cimpian, A., Gelman, S. A., & Brandone, A. C. (2010). Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 261276. 10.1080/01690960903025227
  20. Cohen, A. (1999). Think generic! The meaning and use of generic sentences. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
  21. Cohen, A. (2022). Genericity. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.326
  22. Cohen, J. (1983). The Cost of Dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249253. 10.1177/014662168300700301
  23. Crocker, J. (1981). Judgment of covariation by social perceivers. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 272292. 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.272
  24. Dawes, J. (2008). Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61104. 10.1177/147078530805000106
  25. DeJesus, J. M., Callanan, M. A., Solis, G., & Gelman, S. A. (2019). Generic language in scientific communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(37), 1837018377. 10.1073/pnas.1817706116
  26. DeJesus, J. M., Callanan, M. A., Umscheid, V. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2024). Generic Language and Reporting Practices in Developmental Journals: Implications for Facilitating a More Representative Cognitive Developmental Science. Journal of Cognition and Development, 25(2), 273295. 10.1080/15248372.2023.2290504
  27. Denison, S., Reed, C., & Xu, F. (2013). The emergence of probabilistic reasoning in very young infants: Evidence from 4.5- and 6-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 243249. 10.1037/a0028278
  28. Denison, S., & Xu, F. (2014). The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants. Cognition, 130(3), 335347. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.001
  29. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175191. 10.3758/bf03193146
  30. Fraker, W. (2023). Social kind generics and the dichotomizing perspective. Philosophical Psychology, 121. 10.1080/09515089.2023.2276307
  31. Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P. (2019). irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement (Version 0.84.1). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/index.html
  32. Gelman, S. A. (2021). Generics in society. Language in Society, 50(4), 517532. 10.1017/S0047404521000282
  33. Gelman, S. A., & Brandone, A. C. (2010). Fast-Mapping Placeholders: Using Words to Talk About Kinds. Language Learning and Development, 6(3), 223240. 10.1080/15475441.2010.484413
  34. Gelman, S. A., & Roberts, S. O. (2017). How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 79007907. 10.1073/pnas.1621073114
  35. Gelman, S. A., Taylor, M. G., Nguyen, S. P., Leaper, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2004). Mother-Child Conversations about Gender: Understanding the Acquisition of Essentialist Beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(1), i142.
  36. Geurts, B. (1985). Generics. Journal of Semantics, 4(3), 247255. 10.1093/jos/4.3.247
  37. Greenberg, Y. (2007). Exceptions to generics: Where vagueness, context dependence and modality interact. Journal of Semantics, 24(2), 131167. 10.1093/jos/ffm002
  38. Gülgöz, S., & Gelman, S. A. (2015). Children’s recall of generic and specific labels regarding animals and people. Cognitive Development, 33, 8498. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.05.002
  39. Hammond, M. D., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Investigating the cognitive structure of stereotypes: Generic beliefs about groups predict social judgments better than statistical beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 607614. 10.1037/xge0000297
  40. Hoorens, V., Hermans, F., & Bruckmüller, S. (2026). Why boys cry and don’t cry: The Contextual-Statistical (ConStat) approach to the perceived validity of generics. Cognition, 266, 106323. 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106323
  41. Juslin, P., Winman, A., & Hansson, P. (2007). The naïve intuitive statistician: A naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. Psychological Review, 114(3), 678703. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.678
  42. Kassambara, A. (2025a). ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots (Version 0.6.2). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggpubr/index.html
  43. Kassambara, A. (2025b). rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests (Version 0.7.3). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstatix/index.html
  44. Khemlani, S., Leslie, S.-J., & Glucksberg, S. (2012). Inferences about members of kinds: The generics hypothesis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6), 887900. 10.1080/01690965.2011.601900
  45. Kochari, A., Van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2020). Generics and Alternatives. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01274
  46. Kramer, H. J., Goldfarb, D., Tashjian, S. M., & Hansen Lagattuta, K. (2021). Dichotomous thinking about social groups: Learning about one group can activate opposite beliefs about another group. Cognitive Psychology, 129, 101408. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101408
  47. Kuhn, M. (2008). Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28, 126. 10.18637/jss.v028.i05
  48. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174. 10.2307/2529310
  49. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., Katsos, N., & Stockall, L. (2015). Genericity is Easy? Formal and Experimental Perspectives. Ratio, 28(4), 470494. 10.1111/rati.12116
  50. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., Katsos, N., & Stockall, L. (2019). Generalizing About Striking Properties: Do Glippets Love to Play With Fire? Frontiers in Psychology, 10. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01971
  51. Lejarraga, T., & Hertwig, R. (2021). How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality. Psychological Bulletin, 147(6), 535564. 10.1037/bul0000324
  52. Lerner, A., & Leslie, S.-J. (2016). Generics and Experimental Philosophy. In A Companion to Experimental Philosophy (pp. 404416). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118661666.ch28
  53. Leslie, S.-J. (2007). Generics and the Structure of the Mind. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 375403. 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.x
  54. Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and Acquisition. The Philosophical Review, 117(1), 147. 10.1215/00318108-2007-023
  55. Leslie, S.-J., & Lerner, A. (2022). Generic Generalizations. https://plato.stanford.edu/ENTRIES/generics/
  56. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2013). Calculate or wait: Is man an eager or a lazy intuitive statistician? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(8), 9941014. 10.1080/20445911.2013.841170
  57. Lockhead, G. R. (2004). Absolute judgments are relative: A reinterpretation of some psychophysical ideas. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 265272. 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.265
  58. Lux, A., Bruckmüller, S., & Hoorens, V. (2024a). Are women brave or braver than Men? Judgments of implicit and explicit intergroup comparisons. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 43(2), 137163. 10.1177/0261927X231210513
  59. Lux, A., Bruckmüller, S., & Hoorens, V. (2024b). Interpretations of generic versus comparative statements about groups: Similarities and differences. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, online first. 10.1177/0261927X241292562
  60. Manis, M., Biernat, M., & Nelson, T. F. (1991). Comparison and expectancy processes in human judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 203211. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.203
  61. Mannheim, B. (2021). The social (and cultural, and syntactic, and semantic) life of generics. Language in Society, 50(4), 605618. 10.1017/S0047404521000336
  62. McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(9), 929940. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.929
  63. McCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 195208. 10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.195
  64. Moty, K., & Rhodes, M. (2021). The unintended consequences of the things we say: What generic statements communicate to children about unmentioned categories. Psychological Science, 32(2), 189203. 10.1177/0956797620953132
  65. Mussweiler, T. (2003a). Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472489. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
  66. Mussweiler, T. (2003b). ‘Everything is relative’: Comparison processes in social judgment The 2002 Jaspars Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 719733. 10.1002/ejsp.169
  67. Passanisi, A., Pace, U., Kabir, K. T., & Hampton, J. A. (2021). Ducks lay eggs and lions have manes: The acceptability of gender-specific minority generic sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(12), 1998. 10.1037/xlm0001081
  68. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  69. Peters, U., Krauss, A., & Braganza, O. (2022). Generalization Bias in Science. Cognitive Science, 46(9), e13188. 10.1111/cogs.13188
  70. Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68(1), 2946. 10.1037/h0024722
  71. Prasada, S., Khemlani, S., Leslie, S.-J., & Glucksberg, S. (2013). Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. Cognition, 126(3), 405422. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010
  72. R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 4.3.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  73. Ramotowska, S., Haaf, J., Van Maanen, L., & Szymanik, J. (2024). Most quantifiers have many meanings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(6), 26922703. 10.3758/s13423-024-02502-7
  74. Ramotowska, S., Steinert-Threlkeld, S., van Maanen, L., & Szymanik, J. (2023). Uncovering the Structure of Semantic Representations Using a Computational Model of Decision-Making. Cognitive Science, 47(1), e13234. 10.1111/cogs.13234
  75. Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., & Tworek, C. M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(34), 1352613531. 10.1073/pnas.1208951109
  76. Riley, C. A. (1976). The representation of comparative relations and the transitive inference task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22(1), 122. 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90085-0
  77. Rothermund, P., & Deutsch, R. (2025). Differentiation and Generic Sentences. Cognitive Science, 49(3), e70057. 10.1111/cogs.70057
  78. Rudolph, R. E. (2024). Social Generics in Context. Philosophical Perspectives, 38(1), 103116. 10.1111/phpe.12206
  79. Ryu, S. H., Yang, W., & Park, J. C. (2022). Flexible Acceptance Condition of Generics from a Probabilistic Viewpoint: Towards Formalization of the Semantics of Generics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(6), 12091229. 10.1007/s10936-022-09851-1
  80. Schulze, C., & Hertwig, R. (2021). A description–experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups. Cognition, 210, 104580. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104580
  81. Silva, P. (2020). A Bayesian explanation of the irrationality of sexist and racist beliefs involving generic content. Synthese, 197(6), 24652487. 10.1007/s11229-018-1813-9
  82. Simms, L. J., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Bernstein, L. (2019). Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557566. 10.1037/pas0000648
  83. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311322. 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
  84. Sterken, R. K. (2015). Generics in Context. Philosopher’s Imprint, 15(21). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0015.021
  85. Tasimi, A., Gelman, S. A., Cimpian, A., & Knobe, J. (2017). Differences in the Evaluation of Generic Statements About Human and Non-Human Categories. Cognitive Science, 41(7), 19341957. 10.1111/cogs.12440
  86. Tessler, M. H., & Goodman, N. D. (2019a). Learning from Generic Language. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/hnm8p
  87. Tessler, M. H., & Goodman, N. D. (2019b). The language of generalization. Psychological Review, 126(3), 395436. 10.1037/rev0000142
  88. Van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2020). Generics and typicality: A bounded rationality approach. Linguistics and Philosophy, 43(1), 83117. 10.1007/s10988-019-09265-8
  89. Verbree, A.-R., Toepoel, V., & Perada, D. (2020). The effect of seriousness and device use on data quality. Social Science Computer Review, 38(6), 720738. 10.1177/0894439319841027
  90. Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.) [PDF]. Springer International Publishing.
  91. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., D’Agostino McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., et al. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. 10.21105/joss.01686
  92. Wickham, H., & Bryan, J. (2025). readxl: Read Excel Files (Version 1.4.5). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/readxl/index.html
  93. Wickham, H., Hester, J., Francois, R., Bryan, J., & Bearrows, S. (2025). readr: Read Rectangular Text Data (Version 2.1.6). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/readr/index.html
  94. Xu, F., & Garcia, V. (2008). Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(13), 50125015. 10.1073/pnas.0704450105
  95. Zadeh, L. A. (1983). A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 9(1), 149184. 10.1016/0898-1221(83)90013-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.493 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2024
|
Accepted on: Feb 17, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 5, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Felix Hermans, Walter Schaeken, Susanne Bruckmüller, Vera Hoorens, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.