References
- Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(5), 603–623. 10.3758/PBR.17.5.603
- Balleine, B. W., & Dezfouli, A. (2019). Hierarchical action control: Adaptive collaboration between actions and habits. Frontiers in Psychology: Cognitive Science, 10. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02735
- Barth, M., Stahl, C., & Haider, H. (2019). Assumptions of the process-dissociation procedure are violated in implicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(4), 641–676. 10.1037/xlm0000614
- De Houwer, J. (2014).
Why a propositional single-process model of associative learning deserves to be defended . In J. W. Sherman & B. Gawronski (Eds.), Dual processes in social psychology (pp. 530–541). Guilford. - De Houwer, J., & Hughes, S. (2020). The psychology of learning: An introduction from a functional-cognitive perspective. The MIT Press.
- de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y.
- Dezfouli, A., & Balleine, B. W. (2013). Actions, action sequences and habits: Evidence that goal-directed and habitual action control are hierarchically organized. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(e1003364). 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003364
- Frings, C., Beste, C., Benini, E., Möller, M., Dignath, D., Giesen, C. G., … Schmalbrock, P. (2024). Consensus definitions of perception-action-integration in action control. Communications Psychology, 2(1),
7 . 10.1038/s44271-023-00050-9 - Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., … Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). You better stop! Binding “stop” tags to irrelevant stimulus features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 809–832. 10.1080/17470218.2013.834372
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2016). Multi-level response coding in stimulus-response bindings: Irrelevant distractors retrieve both semantic and motor response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1643–1656. 10.1037/xlm0000264
- Giesen, C., Schmidt, J. R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2927). 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
- Giesen, C. G., Duderstadt, H., Richter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2025). Dissociating the roles of episodic retrieval and contingency awareness in valence contingency learning. Cognition & Emotion. 10.1080/02699931.2025.2456608
- Giesen, C. G., Rudolph, M., & Rothermund, K. (2025). False contingency beliefs reverse contingency learning effects in the valence contingency learning task. Cognition and Emotion. 10.1080/02699931.2025.2580411
- Güldenpenning, I., Böer, N. T., Kunde, W., Giesen, C. G., Rothermund, K., & Weigelt, M. (2024). Context-specific adaptation for head fakes in basketball: A study on player-specific fake-frequency schedules. Psychological Research, 88, 1702–1711. 10.1007/s00426-024-01977-2
- Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16(2), 96–101. 10.3758/BF03202365
- Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 1–66. 10.1017/S0140525X00021269
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. 10.1080/713756773
- Jamieson, R. K., Crump, M. J. C., & Hannah, S. D. (2012). An instance theory of associative learning. Learning and Behavior, 40(1), 61–82. 10.3758/s13420-011-0046-2
- Jiménez, L., Méndez, C., & Cleeremans, A. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 948–969. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.948
- Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110(2), 316–339. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.316
- Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000a). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63(1), 22–35. 10.1007/PL00008165
- Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000b). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 863–882. 10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.863
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 932–943. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.932
- Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(5), 419–434. 10.3758/BF03203035
- Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 183–198. 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019a). Binding processes in the control of nonroutine action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(9), 1135–1145. 10.1037/xhp0000665
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019b). From simple to complex actions: Response–response bindings as a new approach to action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 174–183. 10.1037/xge0000483
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2021). Response–response bindings do not decay for 6 seconds after integration: A case for bindings’ relevance in hierarchical action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(4), 508–517. 10.1037/xhp0000897
- Moeller, B., & Pfister, R. (2022). Ideomotor learning: Time to generalize a longstanding principle. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 140(104782). 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104782
- Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32. 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
- Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(3), 585–594. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.585
- Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972).
A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement . In A. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). Appleton Century Crofts. - Rothermund, K., Kapinos, L., De Houwer, J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2025). Long-term contingency learning: The role of episodic retrieval and contingency awareness. Journal of Cognition, 8(1),
23 . 10.5334/joc.433 - Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 482–495. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482
- Rudolph, M., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2025a). False contingency knowledge reverses the color-word contingency learning effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(7), 1023–1033. 10.1037/xlm0001413
- Rudolph, M., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2025b). Stimulus-response binding and retrieval operates independently of contingency awareness: A mega-analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 135(103936). 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103936
- Rudolph, M., & Rothermund, K. (2025). Two sources of color-word contingency learning: Episodic retrieval of SR bindings and propositional knowledge Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(2), 209–217. 10.1037/xlm0001353
- Rudolph, M., & Rothermund, K. (2026). When does binding become learning, if it ever does? How sequences of stimulus-response combinations affect episodic retrieval in a color-word repetition paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 33,
41 . 10.3758/s13423-025-02837-9 - Schmidt, J. R. (2021). Incidental learning of simple stimulus-response associations: A review of color-word contingency learning research. L’Année Psychologique 121(2), 77–127. 10.3917/anpsy1.212.0077
- Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J. C., Cheesman, J., & Besner, D. (2007). Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 16(2), 421–435. 10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.010
- Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 739–761. 10.1177/1747021820906397
- Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2012). Generalized lessons about sequence learning from the study of the serial reaction time task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 165–178. 10.5709/acp-0113-1
- Timmermans, B., & Cleeremans, A. (2015).
How can we measure awareness? An overview of current methods . In M. Overgaard (Ed.), Behavioural methods in consciousness research (pp. 21–46). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688890.003.0003 - Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
- Vaquero, J. M. M., Jiménez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 97–109. 10.1007/s00221-006-0523-6
- Xu, G., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2020). Reliable correlational cuing while controlling for most-recent-pairing effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,
592377 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592377