References
- Baddeley, A. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
- Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2022). Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 17470218221128546. 10.1177/17470218221128546
- Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203342398
- Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Kunz, B. R. (2010). Perception and action. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(6), 800–810. 10.1002/wcs.82
- Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 45(9), 1265–1270. 10.1037/xhp0000673
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712. 10.1037/xlm0000022
- Eder, A. B. (2023). A perceptual control theory of emotional action. Cognition and Emotion, 37(7), 1167–1184. 10.1080/02699931.2023.2265234
- Formica, S., González-García, C., & Brass, M. (2020). The effects of declaratively maintaining and proactively proceduralizing novel stimulus-response mappings. Cognition, 201, 104295. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104295
- Frings, C. (2011). On the decay of distractor-response episodes. Experimental psychology, 58(2), 125–131. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000077
- Frings, C., Beste, C., Benini, E., Möller, M., Dignath, D., Giesen, C. G., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Koch, I., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Mocke, V., Moeller, B., Münchau, A., Parmar, J., Pastötter, B., Pfister, R., Philipp, A. M., Qiu, R., … Schmalbrock, P. (2024). Consensus definitions of perception-action-integration in action control. Communications Psychology, 2(1), 1–5. 10.1038/s44271-023-00050-9
- Frings, C., Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Pastötter, B., & Pfister, R. (2023). The relation between learning and stimulus-response binding. Psychological review. 10.1037/rev0000449
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in cognitive sciences, 24(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Moeller, B., Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Pastötter, B. (2022). Stimulus decay functions in action control. Scientific reports, 12(1), 20139. 10.1038/s41598-022-24499-6
- Frings, C., & Möller, B. (2010). Binding targets’ responses to distractors’ locations: Distractor response bindings in a location-priming task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2176–2183. 10.3758/BF03196693
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 60(10), 1367–1377. 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Exner, S. (1879).
Physiologie der Grosshirnrinde . In L. Herrmann (Ed.), Handbuch der Physiologie, (vol. 2, pp. 189–350). Vogel. - Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 373–387. 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: Experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 40(3), 645–659. 10.1037/a0035278
- Giesen, C. G., Schmidt, J. R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2927. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
- Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25. 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
- Haazebroek, P., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2017). HiTEC: A connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1085–1109. 10.1007/s00426-016-0803-0
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2000).
The Prepared Reflex: Automaticity and Control in Stimulus-Response Translation . In J. Driver & S. Monsell (Hrsg.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (S. 247–273). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1481.003.0019 - Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(11), 494–500. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 81(7), 2139–2154. 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
- Hommel, B., & Frings, C. (2020). The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Psychonomic bulletin & review. 10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(5), 849–878. 10.1017/s0140525x01000103
- Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological research, 68(1), 1–17. 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
- James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company. 10.1037/11059-000
- Kaup, B., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Bryce, D., Butz, M. V., Dignath, D., Dudschig, C., Franz, V. H., Friedrich, C., Gawrilow, C., Heller, J., Huff, M., Hütter, M., Janczyk, M., Leuthold, H., Mallot, H., Nürk, H.-C., Ramscar, M., Said, N., … Wong, H. Y. (2024). Modal and amodal cognition: An overarching principle in various domains of psychology. Psychological Research, 88(2), 307–337. 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w
- Kiesel, A. (2009). Unbewusste Wahrnehmung: Handlungsdeterminierende Reizerwartungen bestimmen die Wirksamkeit subliminaler Reize. Psychologische Rundschau, 60(4), 215–228. 10.1026/0033-3042.60.4.215
- Koch, I., Frings, C., & Schuch, S. (2018). Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: Evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Psychological research, 82(3), 570–579. 10.1007/s00426-017-0847-9
- Kowialiewski, B., & Oberauer, K. (2025). Semantic representations in working memory: A computational model. Psychological Review. 10.1037/rev0000562
- Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387–394. 10.1037//0096-1523.27.2.387
- Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., & Zellmann, P. (2002). The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta psychologica, 109(2), 137–155. 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00053-1
- Kunde, W., Weller, L., & Pfister, R. (2018). Sociomotor action control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 917–931. 10.3758/s13423-017-1316-6
- Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1325–1335. 10.1037/a0028148
- Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107(1), 32–63. 10.1037/0096-3445.107.1.32
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 1–35. 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90002-L
- Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 347–356. 10.1038/nn.3655
- Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 26(5), 1124–1140. 10.1037//0278-7393.26.5.1124
- Meiran, N., & Cohen-Kdoshay, O. (2012). Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: Further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 139(2), 309–313. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.008
- Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological research, 77(3), 249–259. 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960).
The integration of plans . In G. A. Miller, E. Galanter, & K. H. Pribram, Plans and the structure of behavior. (S. 95–102). Henry Holt and Co. 10.1037/10039-007 - Mocke, V., Benini, E., Parmar, J., Schiltenwolf, M., & Kunde, W. (2023). What is behind partial repetition costs? Event-files do not fully occupy bound feature codes. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 10.3758/s13423-023-02253-x
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 76(4), 959–978. 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2021). Response–response bindings do not decay for 6 seconds after integration: A case for bindings’ relevance in hierarchical action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(4), 508–517. (2021-07871-001). 10.1037/xhp0000897
- Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2016). The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 42(4), 464–479. 10.1037/xhp0000158
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Moutsopoulou, K., Yang, Q., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2015). Stimulus–classification and stimulus–action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(9), 1744–1757. 10.1080/17470218.2014.984232
- Oberauer, K. (2009).
Chapter 2 Design for a Working Memory . In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (S. 45–100). Elsevier. 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X - Oberauer, K. (2010). Declarative and Procedural Working Memory: Common Principles, Common Capacity Limits? Psychologica Belgica, 50(3–4), 277. 10.5334/pb-50-3-4-277
- Oberauer, K. (2013). The focus of attention in working memory—From metaphors to mechanisms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673
- Oberauer, K. (2020).
Towards a Theory of Working Memory: From Metaphors to Mechanisms . In R. H. Logie, V. Camos, & N. Cowan (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (S. 116–149). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198842286.003.0005 - Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Greaves, M. (2012). Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 779–819. 10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4
- Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. (2013). Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model. Cognitive psychology, 66(2), 157–211. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.11.001
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Aufschnaiter, S., Thomaschke, R., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Only time will tell the future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1183–1200. 10.1037/xhp0000850
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus-response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 43(2), 328–347. 10.1037/xhp0000317
- Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., Frings, C., & Mayr, S. (2023). The influence of event segmentation by context on stimulus-response binding. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 49(3), 355–369. 10.1037/xhp0001093
- Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022). Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 84(4), 1264–1285. 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5
- Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 31(3), 482–495. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482
- Schiltenwolf, M., Dignath, D., & Hazeltine, E. (2024). Binding of response-independent task rules. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 10.3758/s13423-024-02465-9
- Schmalbrock, P., Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2021). Integrating salience and action – Increased integration strength through salience. Visual Cognition, 29(2), 91–104. 10.1080/13506285.2020.1871455
- Schmidt, J. R., Houwer, J., & Rothermund, K. (2016). The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs. Cognitive psychology, 91, 82–108. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.004
- Schmidt, J. R., & Liefooghe, B. (2016). Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions. PloS one, 11(3), 0151188. 10.1371/journal.pone.0151188
- Schmidt, J. R., Liefooghe, B., & Houwer, J. (2020). An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 22. 10.5334/joc.97
- Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological bulletin, 136(6), 943–974. 10.1037/a0020541
- Souza, A. S., Oberauer, K., Gade, M., & Druey, M. D. (2012). Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 1006–1033. 10.1080/17470218.2011.640403
- Spapé, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2008). He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 15(6), 1117–1121. 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117
- Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 176–188. 10.1007/s00426-003-0154-5
- Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1625–1640. 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1625