References
- Bardi, L., Bundt, C., Notebaert, W., & Brass, M. (2015). Eliminating mirror responses by instructions. Cortex, 70, 128–136. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.018
- Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53(1), 153–164. 10.1080/713755872
- Betti, S., Chinellato, E., Guerra, S., Castiello, U., & Sartori, L. (2019). Social Motor Priming: When offline interference facilitates motor execution. PeerJ, 7. 10.7717/peerj.7796
- Bird, G., Brindley, R., Leighton, J., & Heyes, C. (2007). General Processes, Rather Than “Goals,” Explain Imitation Errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1158–1169. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1158
- Bolt, N. K., Poncelet, E. M., Schultz, B. G., & Loehr, J. D. (2016). Mutual coordination strengthens the sense of joint agency in cooperative joint action. Consciousness and Cognition, 46, 173–187. 10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.001
- Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? 9(10). 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007
- Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 1–38. 10.5334/joc.72
- Butterfill, S. (2012). Joint action and development. Philosophical Quarterly, 62(246), 23–47. 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00005.x
- Candidi, M., Sacheli, L. M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015). From muscles synergies and individual goals to interpersonal synergies and shared goals: Mirror neurons and interpersonal action hierarchies. Physics of Life Reviews, 12, 126–128. 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.01.023
- Chiavarino, C., Bugiani, S., Grandi, E., & Colle, L. (2013). Is Automatic Imitation Based on Goal Coding or Movement Coding? Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 213–225. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000190
- Ciardo, F., De Tommaso, D., & Wykowska, A. (2022). Joint action with artificial agents: Human-likeness in behaviour and morphology affects sensorimotor signaling and social inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 132,
107237 . 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107237 - Clarke, S., McEllin, L., Francová, A., Székely, M., Butterfill, S. A., & Michael, J. (2019). Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner’s incongruent actions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–9. 10.1038/s41598-019-52124-6
- Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M. A., D’Souza, A. D. C., Welsh, T. N., & Skarratt, P. A. (2018). Are goal states represented during kinematic imitation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 226–242. 10.1037/xhp0000429
- Cole, G. G., Welsh, T. N., & Skarratt, P. A. (2019). The role of transients in action observation. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(7), 2177–2191. 10.3758/s13414-019-01740-5
- Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., Coster, L. De, Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E., & Brass, M. (2018). Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(5), 453–500. 10.1037/bul0000143
- Csibra, G. (2007).
Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account . In Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition XXII (pp. 435–459). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231447.003.0020 - de Leeuw, J. R., Gilbert, R. A., & Luchterhandt, B. (2023). jsPsych: Enabling an Open-Source Collaborative Ecosystem of Behavioral Experiments. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(85),
5351 . 10.21105/joss.05351 - Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor Repetitions Retrieve Previous Responses to Targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Gattis, M., Bekkering, H., & Wohlschläger, A. (2002).
Goal-directed imitation . In The Imitative Mind (pp. 183–205). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489969.011 - Genschow, O., & Cracco, E. (Eds.). (2025). Automatic Imitation. Springer Nature Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-031-62634-0
- Giesen, C., & Frings, C. (2021). Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of observational stimulus-response bindings. Acta Psychologica, 217,
103330 . 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103330 - Giesen, C., Herrmann, J., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Copying competitors? Interdependency modulates stimulus-based retrieval of observed responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1978–1991. 10.1037/a0037614
- Giesen, C., Scherdin, K., & Rothermund, K. (2017). Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation. Learning & Behavior, 45(2), 147–156. 10.3758/s13420-016-0250-1
- Grafton, S. T., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Human Movement Science, 26(4), 590–616. 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009
- Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response-time. In Acta Psychologica (Vol. 39). 10.1016/0001-6918(75)90041-4
- Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic Imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 463–483. 10.1037/a0022288
- Heyes, C. (2013).
Imitation: Associative and Context Dependent . In Action Science (pp. 309–332). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.0019 - Hommel, B. (1998). Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. 10.1080/713756773
- Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical Mechanisms of Human Imitation. Science, 286(5449), 2526–2528. 10.1126/science.286.5449.2526
- Janczyk, M., Welsh, T. N., & Dolk, T. (2016). A role of goals for social inhibition of return? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(12), 2402–2418. 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112417
- JASP Team. (2024). JASP (Version 0.19.0)[Computer software].
https://jasp-stats.org/ . - Kaup, B., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Bryce, D., Butz, M. V., Dignath, D., Dudschig, C., Franz, V. H., Friedrich, C., Gawrilow, C., Heller, J., Huff, M., Hütter, M., Janczyk, M., Leuthold, H., Mallot, H., Nürk, H.-C., Ramscar, M., Said, N., … Wong, H. Y. (2024). Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology. Psychological Research, 88(2), 307–337. 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w
- Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166. 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2
- Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological Research on Joint Action. Theory and Data. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 54). 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00003-6
- Le Bars, S., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Wyart, V., Sari, I., Pacherie, E., & Chambon, V. (2022). Motor Coordination and Strategic Cooperation in Joint Action. Psychological Science, 33(5), 736–751. 10.1177/09567976211053275
- Le Bars, S., Devaux, A., Nevidal, T., Chambon, V., & Pacherie, E. (2020). Agents’ pivotality and reward fairness modulate sense of agency in cooperative joint action. Cognition, 195(October 2019),
104117 . 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104117 - Leighton, J., Bird, G., & Heyes, C. (2010). ‘Goals’ are not an integral component of imitation. Cognition, 114(3), 423–435. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.001
- Li, H., Xia, T., & Wang, L. (2015). Neural correlates of the reverse Simon effect in the Hedge and Marsh task. Neuropsychologia, 75, 119–131. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.028
- Longo, M. R., Kosobud, A., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2008). Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: Effects of priming movements versus goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 489–501. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.489
- Marschner, M., Dignath, D., & Knoblich, G. (2024). Me or we? Action-outcome learning in synchronous joint action. Cognition, 247. 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105785
- Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2007). Activation of Action Rules in Action Observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(6), 1118–1130. 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1118
- McEllin, L., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2018). Imitation from a joint action perspective. Mind and Language, 33(4), 342–354. 10.1111/mila.12188
- Michael, J., & D’Ausilio, A. (2015). Domain-specific and domain-general processes in social perception – A complementary approach. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 434–437. 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.009
- Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
- Newman-Norlund, R. D., Van Schie, H. T., Van Zuijlen, A. M. J., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10(7), 817–818. 10.1038/nn1911
- Ocampo, B., & Kritikos, A. (2010). Placing actions in context: Motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts. Experimental Brain Research, 201(4), 743–751. 10.1007/s00221-009-2089-6
- Ocampo, B., Kritikos, A., & Cunnington, R. (2011). How frontoparietal brain regions mediate imitative and complementary actions: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 6(10). 10.1371/journal.pone.0026945
- Ondobaka, S., & Bekkering, H. (2012). Hierarchy of idea-guided action and perception-guided movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(DEC). 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00579
- Ondobaka, S., & Bekkering, H. (2013).
Conceptual and perceptuo-motor action control and action recognition . In Cortex (Vol. 49, Issue 10, pp. 2966–2967). Masson SpA. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.005 - Ondobaka, S., de Lange, F. P., Newman-Norlund, R. D., Wiemers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2012). Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction. Psychological Science, 23(1), 30–35. 10.1177/0956797611424163
- Ondobaka, S., Newman-Norlund, R. D., De Lange, F. P., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Action recognition depends on observer’s level of action control and social personality traits. PLoS ONE, 8(11). 10.1371/journal.pone.0081392
- Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003
- Pacherie, E. (2014). How does it feel to act together? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 25–46. 10.1007/s11097-013-9329-8
- Pesquita, A., Whitwell, R. L., & Enns, J. T. (2018). Predictive joint-action model: A hierarchical predictive approach to human cooperation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(5), 1751–1769. 10.3758/s13423-017-1393-6
- Poljac, E., Van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Understanding the flexibility of action-perception coupling. Psychological Research, 73(4), 578–586. 10.1007/s00426-009-0238-y
- Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2003). Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect. Acta Psychologica, 112(3), 259–278. 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00125-7
- Ramsey, R., & Ward, R. (2020). Putting the Nonsocial Into Social Neuroscience: A Role for Domain-General Priority Maps During Social Interactions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1076–1094. 10.1177/1745691620904972
- Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 661–670. 10.1038/35090060
- Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(12), 757–765. 10.1038/nrn.2016.135
- Rocca, M., Sacheli, L. M., Romeo, L., & Cavallo, A. (2023). Visuo-motor interference is modulated by task interactivity: A kinematic study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 10.3758/s13423-023-02297-z
- Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of Incidental Stimulus-Response Associations as a Source of Negative Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 482–495. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482
- Sacheli, L. M., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2015). Social cues to joint actions: The role of shared goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JUL), 1–7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01034
- Sacheli, L. M., Arcangeli, E., & Paulesu, E. (2018). Evidence for a dyadic motor plan in joint action. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–12. 10.1038/s41598-018-23275-9
- Sacheli, L. M., Verga, C., Arcangeli, E., Banfi, G., Tettamanti, M., & Paulesu, E. (2019). How task interactivity shapes action observation. Cerebral Cortex, 29(12), 5302–5314. 10.1093/cercor/bhz205
- Sahaï, A., Desantis, A., Grynszpan, O., Pacherie, E., & Berberian, B. (2019). Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: Comparing human and machine co-agents. Consciousness and Cognition, 67, 44–55. 10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.008
- Sartori, L., & Betti, S. (2015).
Complementary actions . In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 6, Issue MAY). Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00557 - Sartori, L., Betti, S., Chinellato, E., & Castiello, U. (2015). The multiform motor cortical output: Kinematic, predictive and response coding. Cortex, 70, 169–178. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.019
- Sartori, L., Bucchioni, G., & Castiello, U. (2013). When emulation becomes reciprocity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(6), 662–669. 10.1093/scan/nss044
- Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., & Castiello, U. (2012). From simulation to reciprocity: The case of complementary actions. Social Neuroscience, 7(2), 146–158. 10.1080/17470919.2011.586579
- Schmitz, L., Wahn, B., & Krüger, M. (2023). Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1
- Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
- Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2021). Progress in Joint-Action Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 10.1177/0963721420984425
- Sinigaglia, C., & Butterfill, S. A. (2022). Motor representation in acting together. Synthese, 200(2). 10.1007/s11229-022-03539-8
- Strasser, A. (2015).
Can Artificial Systems Be Part of a Collective Action? In Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems (pp. 205–218). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-15515-9_11 - Strasser, A. (2018). Social Cognition and Artificial Agents (pp. 106–114). 10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_12
- Uithol, S., van Rooij, I., Bekkering, H., & Haselager, P. (2012). Hierarchies in Action and Motor Control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1077–1086. 10.1162/jocn_a_00204
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1985). A Theory of Action Identification. Psychology Press. 10.4324/9781315802213
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2012).
Action Identification Theory . In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (pp. 327–348). SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781446249215.n17 - van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J., Marsman, M., Draws, T., van Kesteren, E.-J., Derks, K., Dablander, F., Gronau, Q. F., Kucharskyý, Š., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Voelkel, J. G., Stefan, A., Ly, A., Hinne, M., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A tutorial on conducting and interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. L’Année psychologique, 120, 73–69. 10.3917/anpsy1.201.0073
- van Schie, H. T., van Waterschoot, B. M., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Understanding Action Beyond Imitation: Reversed Compatibility Effects of Action Observation in Imitation and Joint Action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1493–1500. 10.1037/a0011750
- Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 998–1003. 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002
- Ward, R., & Ramsey, R. (2024). Integrating Social Cognition Into Domain-General Control: Interactive Activation and Competition for the Control of Action (ICON). Cognitive Science, 48(2). 10.1111/cogs.13415
- Wild, K. S., Poliakoff, E., Jerrison, A., & Gowen, E. (2010). The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation. Experimental Brain Research, 204(3), 353–360. 10.1007/s00221-009-2034-8
- Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460
- Wohlschläger, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 501–515. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1257
- Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1238
- Wühr, P., & Biebl, R. (2009). Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71(2), 248–257. 10.3758/APP.71.2.248
- Zapparoli, L., Paulesu, E., Mariano, M., Ravani, A., & Sacheli, L. M. (2022). The sense of agency in joint actions: A theory-driven meta-analysis. Cortex, 148, 99–120. 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.002