Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Touching Difference: Evidence for Stimulus-Response Binding Effects in Tactile Detection and Localization Performance but Not in Their Visual Counterparts Cover

The Touching Difference: Evidence for Stimulus-Response Binding Effects in Tactile Detection and Localization Performance but Not in Their Visual Counterparts

Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Bergerbest, D., Ghahremani, D. G., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Neural correlates of auditory repetition priming: reduced fMRI activation in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 966977. 10.1162/0898929041502760
  2. Berlucchi, G. (2006). Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(7), 10651074. 10.1080/02643290600588426
  3. Berlucchi, G., Di Stefani, M., Marzi, C.A., Morelli, M., & Tassinari, G. (1981). Direction of attention in the visual field as measured by a reaction time paradigm. Behavioral Brain Research, 2(2), 244245. 10.1016/0166-4328(81)90066-8
  4. Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Frings, C. (2023). Towards a systematization of brain oscillatory activity in actions. Communications Biology, 6(1). 10.1038/s42003-023-04531-9
  5. Chao, H. F., & Hsiao, F.-S. (2021). Location-response binding and inhibition of return in a detection task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(5), 19922001. 10.3758/s13414-021-02283-4
  6. Chao, H.-F., Hsiao, F.-S., & Huang, S.-C. (2022). Binding of features and responses in inhibition of return: The effects of task demand. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 49, 120. 10.5334/joc.247
  7. Chao, H. F., Kuo, C.-Y., Chen, M. S., & Hsiao, F.-S. (2020). Contextual similarity between successive targets modulates inhibition of return in the target-target paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2052), 18. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02052
  8. Christie, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 55(1), 2438. 10.1037/h0087350
  9. Cohen, J. C., Bolanowski, S. J., & Verrillo, R. T. (2005). A direct comparison of exogenous and endogenous inhibition of return and selective attention mechanisms in the somatosensory system. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 22(4), 269279. 10.1080/08990220500420335
  10. Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(2), 409412. 10.3758/BF03203962
  11. Davelaar, E. J., & Stevens, J. (2009). Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: A direct comparison of two competing accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 121126. 10.3758/PBR.16.1.121
  12. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731750. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
  13. Dukewich, K. R., & Klein, R. M. (2015). Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical framework. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 16471658. 10.3758/s13414-015-0835-3
  14. Dyson, B. J. (2010) Trial after trial: General processing consequences as a function of repetition and change in multidimensional sound. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 17701788. 10.1080/17470210903514255
  15. Eder, A. B., Erle, T. M., & Kunde, W. (2020). Reward strengthens action–effect binding. Motivation Science, 6(3), 297302. 10.1037/mot0000153
  16. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175191. 10.3758/BF03193146
  17. Fletcher, B. C., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1978). The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(3), 417427. 10.1080/00335557843000025
  18. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 88101. 10.3758/BF03205479
  19. Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Taddese, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 27552767. 10.3758/s13414-015-0959-5
  20. Fox, E., & de Fockert, J.-W. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 798812. 10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.798
  21. Frings, C., Beste, C., Benini, E., Möller, M., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Koch, I., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Mocke, V., Moeller, B., Münchau, A., Parmar, J., Pastötter, B., Pfister, R., Philipp, A., Qiu, R., … Schmalbrock, P. (2024). Consensus definitions of perception-action-integration in action control. Communications Psychology, 2, 7. 10.1038/s44271-023-00050-9
  22. Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
  23. Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2012). The horserace between distractors and targets: Retrieval-based probe responding depends on distractor-target asynchrony. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 582590. 10.1080/20445911.2012.666852
  24. Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 13671377. 10.1080/17470210600955645
  25. Galazky, I., Schütze, H., Noesselt, T., Hopf, J. M., Heinze, H. J., & Schoenfeld, M. A. (2009). Attention to somatosensory events is directly linked to the preparation for action. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 279(1–2), 9398. 10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.006
  26. Geissler, C. F., Schöpper, L.-M., Engesser, A. F., Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Frings, C. (2024). Turning the light switch on binding: Prefrontal activity for binding and retrieval in action control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 36(1), 95106. 10.1162/jocn_a_02071
  27. Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376384. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
  28. Hilchey, M. D., Rajsic, J., Huffman, G., Klein, R. M., & Pratt, J. (2018). Dissociating orienting biases from integration effects with eye movements. Psychological Science, 29(3), 328339. 10.1177/0956797617734021
  29. Hilchey, M. D., Rajsic, J., & Pratt, J. (2020). When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(6), 30133032. 10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3
  30. Hirst, R. J., Cragg, L., & Allen, H. A. (2018). Vision dominates audition in adults but not children: A meta-analysis of the Colavita effect. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 286301. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.012
  31. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183216. 10.1080/713756773
  32. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494500. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
  33. Hommel, B. (2007). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71(1), 4263. 10.1007/s00426-005-0035-1
  34. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11(4), 483521. 10.1080/13506280344000400
  35. Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings. Psychological Research, 78(4), 530538. 10.1007/s00426-013-0503-y
  36. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849937. 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
  37. Hu, F. K., Fan, Z., Samuel, A. G., & He, S. C. (2013). Effects of display complexity on location and feature inhibition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 16191632. 10.3758/s13414-013-0509-y
  38. Hu, F. K., Samuel, A. G., & Chan, A. S. (2011). Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 3550. 10.1037/a0021091
  39. Huffman, G., Hilchey, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2018). Feature integration in basic detection and localization tasks: Insights from the attentional orienting literature. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 13331341. 10.3758/s13414-018-1535-6
  40. Huffman, G., Hilchey, M. D., Weidler, B. J., Mills, M., & Pratt, J. (2020). Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 46(3), 241251. 10.1037/xhp0000709
  41. Jones, A., & Forster, B. (2014). Neural correlates of endogenous attention, exogenous attention and inhibition of return in touch. European Journal of Neuroscience, 40(2), 23892398. 10.1111/ejn.12583
  42. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175219. 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
  43. Kayser, C., Petkov, C. I., Lippert, M., & Logothetis, N. K. (2005). Mechanisms for allocating auditory attention: An auditory saliency map. Current Biology, 15(21), 19431947. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.040
  44. Klein, R. (2004). Orienting and inhibition of return. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 545559). MIT Press.
  45. Klein, R. M., & Hilchey, M. D. (2011). Oculomotor inhibition of return. S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 471492). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  46. Koch, I., Frings, C., & Schuch, S. (2018). Explaining response-repetition effects in task-switching: Evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Psychological Research, 82(3), 570579. 10.1007/s00426-017-0847-9
  47. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatability – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253270. 10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253
  48. Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 518. 10.3758/APP.72.1.5
  49. Krueger, L. E., & Shapiro, R. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same-different judgements. Quartely Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 33(3), 241265. 10.1080/14640748108400791
  50. Kwak, H.-W., & Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(5), 455464. 10.3758/BF03211641
  51. Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(3), 402408. 10.3758/BF03213064
  52. Lloyd, D. M., Bolanowski, S. J. Jr., Howard, L., & McGlone, F. (1999). Mechanisms of attention in touch. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 16(1), 310. 10.1080/08990229970609
  53. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Philbeck, J. W., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(6), 966980. 10.3758/BF03211932
  54. Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and Time (pp. 1734). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563456.003.0002
  55. Lupiáñez, J., Martín-Arévalo, E., & Chica, A. B. (2013). Is inhibition of return due to attentional disengagement or to a detection cost? The detection cost theory of IOR. Psicológica, 34, 221252.
  56. Martín-Arévalo, E., Kingstone, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Is “Inhibition of Return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 347359. 10.1080/17470218.2012.711844
  57. Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(6), 777787. 10.1037//0096-1523.11.6.777
  58. Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77(3), 249259. 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
  59. Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2011). Remember the touch: Tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets. Experimental Brain Research, 214, 121130. 10.1007/s00221-011-2814-9
  60. Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 959978. 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9
  61. Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2016). The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 464479. 10.1037/xhp0000158
  62. Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2006). Time course of attentional bias for fear-relevant pictures in spider-fearful individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(9), 12411250. 10.1016/j.brat.2006.05.003
  63. Mondor, T. A., & Leboe, L. C. (2008). Stimulus and response repetition effects in the detection of sounds: Evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event. Psychological Research, 72, 183191. 10.1007/s00426-006-0095-x
  64. Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception &Psychophysics, 57(1), 117. 10.3758/BF03211845
  65. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 3348. 10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.33
  66. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  67. Poliakoff, E., Spence, C., O’Boyle, D. J., McGlone, F. P., & Cody, F. W. (2002). Tactile inhibition of return: Non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response. Experimental Brain Research, 146(1), 5459. 10.1007/s00221-002-1153-2
  68. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83(2), 157171. 10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.157
  69. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531556.
  70. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211228. 10.1080/02643298508252866
  71. Prinz, W. (1998). Die Reaktion als Willenshandlung [Responses considered as voluntary actions]. Psychologische Rundschau, 49(1), 1020.
  72. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312323. 10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
  73. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of Incidental Stimulus-Response Associations as a Source of Negative Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 482495. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482
  74. Schmalbrock, P., Liesefeld, H. R., & Frings, C. (2023). Increased display complexity reveals effects of salience in action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(10), 13451359. 10.1037/xhp0001151
  75. Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2022). Inhibition of return (IOR) meets stimulus-response (S-R) binding: Manually responding to central arrow targets is driven by S-R binding, not IOR. Visual Cognition, 30, 641658. 10.1080/13506285.2023.2169802
  76. Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2023). Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85, 438451. 10.3758/s13414-021-02436-5
  77. Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2024). Responding, fast and slow: Visual detection and localization performance is unaffected by retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 86(1), 171185. 10.3758/s13414-023-02810-5
  78. Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2025). As time goes by: Event file decay does not unleash inhibition of return. Journal of Cognition, 8(1), 16, 120. 10.5334/joc.422
  79. Schöpper, L.-M., Hilchey, M. D., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2020). Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 20852097. 10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
  80. Schöpper, L.-M., Hoffmann, R., & Frings, C. (2024). Another dimension! Using dimension weighting to observe integration and retrieval in localization performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50(1), 2338. 10.1037/xhp0001176
  81. Schöpper, L.-M., Jerusalem, A., Lötzke, L., & Frings, C. (2023). Bound to a spider without its web: Task-type modulates the retrieval of affective information in subsequent responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(8), 26552672. 10.3758/s13414-023-02791-5
  82. Schöpper, L.-M., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2022a). Found in translation: The role of response mappings for observing binding effects in localization tasks. Visual Cognition, 30, 527545. 10.1080/13506285.2022.2139033
  83. Schöpper, L.-M., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2022b). Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84, 22192235. 10.3758/s13414-022-02538-8
  84. Schöpper, L.-M., Steinweg, J., & Frings, C. (subm.). As heard before: Binding and retrieval in auditory localization corroborates modality dependence for binding approaches in action control. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  85. Singh, T., Moeller, B., Koch, I., & Frings, C. (2018). May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 11431156. 10.3758/s13414-018-1498-7
  86. Singh, T., Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2025). I am once again asking for your attention: A replication of feature-based attention modulations of binding effects with picture stimuli. Journal of Cognition, 8(1), 122. 10.5334/joc.432
  87. Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2020). The role of location in the organization of bindings within short-term episodic traces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(5), 512524. 10.1037/xhp0000729
  88. Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Driver, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 4248. 10.1007/s002210000442
  89. Spence, C., Ranson, J., & Driver, J. (2000). Cross-modal selective attention: On the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(2), 410424. 10.3758/bf0320556
  90. Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 799832. 10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.799
  91. Taylor, T. L., & Donnelly, M. P. W. (2002). Inhibition of return for target discriminations: The effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 292317. 10.3758/BF03195793
  92. Taylor, T. L., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects in localization and discrimination tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 7589. 10.1037/h0087463
  93. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 16391656. 10.1037//0096-1523.26.5.1639
  94. Theeuwes, J., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2012). Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research, 74, 8085. 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.024
  95. Theeuwes, J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2006). Faces capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 13(6), 657665. 10.1080/13506280500410949
  96. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97136. 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
  97. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley.
  98. van Dam, W. O., & Hommel, B. (2010). How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 11841192. 10.1037/a0019955
  99. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Postma, A. (2005). Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state. Experimental Brain Research, 164(4), 464471. 10.1007/s00221-005-2267-0
  100. Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Koster, E. H. W., van Damme, S., & Crombez, G. (2008). Allocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence. Emotion, 8(6), 880885. 10.1037/a0013981
  101. Weissman, D. H., Grant, L. D., Koch, I., & Hazeltine, E. (2022). Partial repetition costs index a mixture of binding and signaling. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85, 505524. 10.3758/s13414-022-02539-7
  102. Welsh, T. N., & Pratt, J. (2006). Inhibition of return in cue-target and target-target tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 174(1), 167175. 10.1007/s00221-006-0433-7
  103. Wiediger, M. D., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 11361149. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1136
  104. Zmigrod, S., Spapé, M., & Hommel, B. (2009). Intermodal event files: Integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action. Psychological Research, 73(5), 674684. 10.1007/s00426-008-0163-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.476 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 17, 2025
|
Accepted on: Nov 26, 2025
|
Published on: Jan 7, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Lars-Michael Schöpper, Paula Soballa, Simon Merz, Christian Frings, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.