References
- Amelang, M. (1966). Untersuchungen über die Unterbrechung einfacher motorischer Handlungen. Inaugural-Dissertation, Philipps-Universität Marburg.
- Baldauf, D., & Deubel, H. (2010). Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping. Vision Research, 50, 999–1013. 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.008
- Bernstein, I. H., & Reese, C. (1965). Behavioral hypotheses and choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 3, 259–260. 10.3758/BF03343125
- Buhlmann, I., & Wascher, E. (2006). Intentional pre-cueing does not influence the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 70(2), 117–124. 10.1007/s00426-004-0193-6
- Burle, B., Possamai, C., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–336. 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6
- Burle, B., Spieser, L., Servant, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2014). Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: Marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 1003–1010. 10.3758/s13423-013-0561-6
- Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2014).
Estimation and testing of computational psychological models . In: P. W. Glimcher & E. Fehr (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (pp. 49–61). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-416008-8.00004-8 - Cespón, J., Hommel, B., Korsch, M., & Galashan, D. (2020). The neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current research. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(6), 1133–1172. 10.3758/s13415-020-00836-y
- Cléry, J., Guipponi, O., Wardak, C., & Ben Hamed, S. (2015). Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: knowns and unknowns. Neuropsychologia, 70, 313–326. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022
- Croux, C., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1992).
Time-efficient algorithms for two highly robust estimators of scale . In: Y. Dodge & J. Whittaker (Eds.), Computational Statistics. Physica. Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-26811-7_58 - Crump, M. J., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316–321. 10.3758/BF03193850
- De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
- Donkin, C., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2009). The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1129–1135. 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1129
- Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1966). Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
- Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343–353. 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.343
- Eimer, M., & Driver, J. (2000). An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch. Psychophysiology, 37(5), 697–705. 10.1111/1469-8986.3750697
- Eimer, M., & Driver, J. (2001). Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potential studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(6), 497–511. 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00029-X
- Emerson, P. L. (1982). Orthogonal-polynomial programs: Good vs. better. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14(5), 489–490. 10.3758/BF03203320
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/bf03193146
- Fitts, P. M., Peterson, J. R., & Wolpe, G. (1963). Cognitive aspects of information processing: II. Adjustments to stimulus redundancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 423–432. 10.1037/h0047993
- Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 641–666. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645
- Graziano, M. S., & Gross, C. G. (1993). A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Experimental Brain Research, 97(1), 96–109. 10.1007/BF00228820
- Heuer, A., & Schubö, A. (2025). Cueing distractors is effective when the incentive to suppress is high. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 10.3758/s13414-025-03075-w
- Heuer, H., Seegelke, C., & Wühr, P. (2023). Staggered onsets of processing relevant and irrelevant stimulus features produce different dynamics of congruency effects. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 8. 10.5334/joc.252
- Heuer, H., & Wühr, P. (2025). The functional role of the task-irrelevant stimulus feature in the congruency sequence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51, 704–736. 10.1037/xlm0001403
- Hinrichs, J. V. (1970). Probability and expectancy in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 21(4), 227–228. 10.3758/BF03332457
- Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1971). Verbal expectancy and probability in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88(3), 367–371. 10.1037/h0030890
- Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A(3), 546–571. 10.1080/027249896392496
- Hübner, R., & Mishra, S. (2016). Location-specific attentional control is also possible in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1867–1872. 10.3758/s13423-016-1057-y
- Janczyk, M., Mackenzie, I. G., & Koob, V. (2025). A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32(2), 690–704. 10.3758/s13423-024-02574-5
- Kelly, S. P., Corbett, E. A., & O’Connell, R. G. (2021). Neurocomputational mechanisms of prior-informed perceptual decision-making in humans. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 467–481. 10.1038/s41562-020-00967-9
- Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270. 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- Làdavas, E., di Pellegrino, G., Farnè, A., & Zeloni, G. (1998). Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 581–589. 10.1162/089892998562988
- Lee, P. S., & Sewell, D. K. (2024). A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(1), 1–31. 10.3758/s13423-023-02288-0
- Logan, G. D. (2015). The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 833–857. 10.1080/17470218.2015.1008020
- Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984). On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 276–291. 10.1037/0096-1523.10.2.276
- Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174–207. 10.3758/BF03210959
- Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Zohary, E. (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(4), 731–740. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007
- Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Current Biology, 13(13), R531–R539. 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00449-4
- Miletić, S., Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., & van Maanen, L. (2017). Parameter recovery for the leaky competing accumulator model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76, 25–50. 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.12.001
- Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
- Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus–response probability on choice reaction time: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1521–1534. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1521
- Miller, J., & Anbar, R. (1981). Expectancy and frequency effects on perceptual and motor systems in choice reaction time. Memory & Cognition, 9(6), 631–641. 10.3758/BF03202358
- Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J., Leuthold, H., Mackenzie, I. G., & Ulrich, R. (2022). The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 837–854. 10.3758/s13423-021-02003-x
- Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(7), 2013–2025. 10.3758/APP.72.7.2013
- Proctor, R. W., Lu, C.-h., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing. Acta Psychologica, 81(1), 53–74. 10.1016/0001-6918(92)90011-2
- Proctor, R. W., Miles, J. D., & Baroni, G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 242–266. 10.3758/s13423-011-0053-5
- Proctor, R. W., & Wang, H. (1997). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response-location precues: Evaluation of the stimulus-identification account. Acta Psychologica, 95(3), 279–298. 10.1016/S0001-6918(96)00044-3
- Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
- Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
- Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333–367. 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333
- Richter, M., & Wühr, P. (2022). The nature of associations between physical stimulus size and left-right response codes. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 15. 10.5334/joc.206
- Richter, M., & Wühr, P. (2023). Associations between physical size and space are strongly asymmetrical. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16256. 10.1038/s41598-023-43313-5
- Richter, M., & Wühr, P. (2024). Different grasping experiences affect mapping effects but not correspondence effects between stimulus size and response location. Psychological Research, 88(7), 2021–2035. 10.1007/s00426-024-01990-5
- Richter, T., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2023). Diffusion models with time-dependent parameters: An analysis of computational effort and accuracy of different numerical methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 114, 1–22. 10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102756
- Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243. 10.1016/0001-6918(82)90036-1
- Rousseeuw, P. J., & Croux, C. (1993). Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(424), 1273–1283. 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476408
- Schmidt, J. R. (2013). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 615–630. 10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
- Schmidt, J. R. (2019). Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 753–771. 10.3758/s13423-018-1520-z
- Schultze-Kraft, M., Birman, D., Rusconi, M., Allefeld, C., Görgen, K., Dähne, S., Blankertz, B., & Haynes, J. D. (2016). The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(4), 1080–1085. 10.1073/pnas.1513569112
- Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 174–176. 10.1037/h0027448
- Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300–304. 10.1037/h0020586
- Speckman, P. L., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Pratte, M. S. (2008). Delta plots and coherent distribution ordering. The American Statistician, 62(3), 262–266.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27644037 - Sternberg, S. (2024). Combining reaction-time distributions to conserve shape. Behavior Research Methods, 56(3), 1164–1191. 10.3758/s13428-023-02084-7
- Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81(1), 75–98. 10.1037/h0035867
- Tseng, P., Bridgeman, B., & Juan, C.-H. (2012). Take the matter into your own hands: A brief review of the effect of nearby-hands on visual processing. Vision Research, 72, 74–77. 10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.005
- Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005
- Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108(3), 550–592. 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550
- van den Wildenberg, W. P., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: a review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 222. 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222
- Van Moorselaar, D., & Slagter, H. A. (2020). Inhibition in selective attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1464, 204–221. 10.1111/nyas.14304
- Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26(3), 435–444. 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90096-6
- Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32(7), 1206–1220. 10.3758/BF03196893
- Wagenmakers, E. J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114(3), 830–841. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830
- Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., de Jong, T., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
- Wascher, E., & Wolber, M. (2004). Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: An EEC-based approach. Psychological Research, 68(1), 18–30. 10.1007/s00426-002-0128-z
- Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 453–464. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453
- Wühr, P. (2006). Response preparation modulates interference from irrelevant spatial information. Acta Psychologica, 122(2), 206–220. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.12.011
- Wühr, P., Frings, C., & Heuer, H. (2018). Response preparation with reliable cues decreases response competition in the Flanker task. Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 286–296. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000411
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2015). The impact of response frequency on spatial stimulus–response correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 162, 13–19. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.012
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2017). Response preparation, response conflict, and the effects of irrelevant flanker stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 70–82. 10.5709/acp-0208-3
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2018). The impact of anatomical and spatial distance between responses on response conflict. Memory & Cognition, 46(6), 994–1009. 10.3758/s13421-018-0817-5
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2025a). Where does the processing of size meet the processing of space? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 87, 1230–1248. 10.3758/s13414-024-02979-3
- Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2025b). Data from three experiments investigating the impact of response frequency on the Simon effect. Mendeley Data, V1. 10.17632/kxnmcn76zv.1
- Wühr, P., & Seegelke, C. (2018). Compatibility between physical stimulus size and left-right responses: Small is left and large is right. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), Article 17. 10.5334/joc.19
- Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1543–1551. 10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1543
- Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58(3), 193–205. 10.1007/BF00419634