References
- 1Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802–814. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802
- 2Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439–461. DOI: 10.3758/BF03214334
- 3Baayen, R. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A pratical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
- 4Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- 5Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- 6Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2012). Morphological processing during visual word recognition in developing readers: Evidence from masked priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1306–1326. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656661
- 7Bowers, J., Davis, C., & Hanley, D. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a ‘hat’ in ‘that’? Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.09.003
- 8Carlisle, J., & Stone, C. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449. DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
- 9Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2017). Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 602–615. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0
- 10Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory & Language, 63, 83–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
- 11Davis, C., & Lupker, S. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668–687. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
- 12Davis, C., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1550–1570. DOI: 10.1037/a0014253
- 13Davis, C., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 904–910. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196784
- 14de Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159–162. DOI: 10.1007/PL00008174
- 15Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908. DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895
- 16Forster, K., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696–713. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696
- 17Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 127–131. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196148
- 18Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35. DOI: 10.1080/01690960701578013
- 19Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017).
Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation . In: Ross, B. (ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 67, 285–317. Elsevier academic press. DOI: 10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.009 - 20Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
- 21Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191–198. DOI: 10.3758/BF03205983
- 38Hasenäcker, J., Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Investigating developmental trajectories of morphemes as reading units in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1093–1108. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000353
- 22Johnson, N., & Pugh, K. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 240–346. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1008
- 23Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
- 24Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
- 25Longtin, C., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334. DOI: 10.1080/01690960244000036
- 26McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
- 27Niswander, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 389–420. DOI: 10.1080/01690960050119643
- 28Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. (1999). The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1142–1158. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142
- 29Rastle, K., Davis, M., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196742
- 30Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
- 31Snell, J., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J. (2018c). Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading. Memory & Cognition, 46, 589–599. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0786-0
- 32Snell, J., Bertrand, D., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2018a). Integrating orthographic information across time and space: Masked priming and flanker effects with orthographic neighbors. Experimental Psychology (in press). DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000386
- 33Snell, J., Declerck, M., & Grainger, J. (2017c). Parallel semantic processing during reading revisited: Effects of translation equivalents in bilingual readers. Language, Cognition & Neuroscience. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1392583
- 34Snell, J., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2017b). Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading. PLoS ONE, 12,
e0173720 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720 - 35Snell, J., Van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018b). OB1-Reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000119
- 36Snell, J., Vitu, F., & Grainger, J. (2017a). Spatial integration of parafoveal orthographic information: Beyond the sub-lexical level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1984–1994. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1217247
- 37Weingartner, K., Juhasz, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 179–188. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.604028