References
- 1Abbate, F. (2023). Natural and Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Aspects. Minds and Machines, 33(4), 791–815. 10.1007/s11023-023-09646-w
- 2Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2014). An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure: Improving Research Quality Before Data Collection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(Volume 1, 2014), 569–595. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091231
- 3Anderson, M. L. (2008).
21—On the Grounds of (X)-Grounded Cognition . In P. Calvo & A. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Science (pp. 423–435). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00021-9 - 4Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. 10.1037/amp0000191
- 5Banks, B., Borghi, A. M., Fargier, R., Fini, C., Jonauskaite, D., Mazzuca, C., Montalti, M., Villani, C., & Woodin, G. (2023). Consensus Paper: Current Perspectives on Abstract Concepts and Future Research Directions. Journal of Cognition, 6(1),
62 . 10.5334/joc.238 - 6Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
- 7Barsalou, L. W. (2003a). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
- 8Barsalou, L. W. (2003b). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5–6), 513–562. 10.1080/01690960344000026
- 9Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
- 10Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
- 11Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future: Topics in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 716–724. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
- 12Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 1–24. 10.5334/JOC.116
- 13Barsalou, L. W. (2021).
Chapter 3. Categories at the interface of cognition and action . In C. Mauri, I. Fiorentini & E. Goria (Eds.), Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work (pp. 35–72). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.220.03bar - 14Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013
- 15Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005).
Situating Abstract Concepts . In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition (1st ed., pp. 129–163). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007 - 16Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2013). Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(45), 18327–18332. 10.1073/pnas.1306572110
- 17Bechtold, L., Cosper, S. H., Malyshevskaya, A., Montefinese, M., Morucci, P., Niccolai, V., Repetto, C., Zappa, A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2023). Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper. Journal of Cognition, 6(1),
61 . 10.5334/joc.237 - 18Bellmund, J. L. S., Gärdenfors, P., Moser, E. I., & Doeller, C. F. (2018). Navigating cognition: Spatial codes for human thinking. Science, 362(6415),
eaat6766 . 10.1126/science.aat6766 - 19Bird, A., & Tobin, E. (2024).
Natural Kinds . In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/natural-kinds/ - 20Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 187–215. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187
- 21Borghi, A. M., & Barsalou, L. (2021). Perspective in the conceptualization of categories. Psychological Research, 85(2), 697–719. 10.1007/s00426-019-01269-0
- 22Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2009). Words as Tools and the Problem of Abstract Word Meanings. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 31(31).
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/58m9n8rp - 23Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153. 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001
- 24Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. 10.1037/bul0000089
- 25Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory & Cognition, 32(6), 863–873. 10.3758/BF03196865
- 26Borghi, A. M., & Pecher, D. (2011). Introduction to the Special Topic Embodied and Grounded Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00187
- 27Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
- 28Braganza, O. (2020). A simple model suggesting economically rational sample-size choice drives irreproducibility. PLOS ONE, 15(3),
e0229615 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0229615 - 29Brick, C., Hood, B., Ekroll, V., & de-Wit, L. (2022). Illusory Essences: A Bias Holding Back Theorizing in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 491–506. 10.1177/1745691621991838
- 30Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., & Eronen, M. I. (2022). Back to Basics: The Importance of Conceptual Clarification in Psychological Science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 340–346. 10.1177/09637214221096485
- 31Bub, D., & Masson, M. (2006). Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations. Aphasiology, 20(9), 1112–1124. 10.1080/02687030600741667
- 32Bub, D., Masson, M., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106(1), 27–58. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.010
- 33Buckwalter, W., & Friedman, O. (2024). Robust Evidence for Knowledge Attribution and Luck: A Comment on Hall et al. (2024). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4),
25152459241268220 . 10.1177/25152459241268220 - 34Buzsáki, G., & Moser, E. I. (2013). Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 130–138. 10.1038/nn.3304
- 35Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. 10.1037/a0015854
- 36Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Spatial language and abstract concepts. WIREs Cognitive Science, 5(2), 139–149. 10.1002/wcs.1271
- 37Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 327–337. 10.1515/lingvan-2014-1015
- 38Chemero, A. (2013). Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 145–150. 10.1037/a0032923
- 39Cienki, A. J. (1997).
Some properties and groupings of image schemas . In M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning (pp. 3–15). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.150.04cie - 40Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
- 41Colling, L. J., Szűcs, D., De Marco, D., Cipora, K., Ulrich, R., Nuerk, H.-C., Soltanlou, M., Bryce, D., Chen, S.-C., Schroeder, P. A., Henare, D. T., Chrystall, C. K., Corballis, P. M., Ansari, D., Goffin, C., Sokolowski, H. M., Hancock, P. J. B., Millen, A. E., Langton, S. R. H., … McShane, B. B. (2020). Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 143–162. 10.1177/2515245920903079
- 42Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Banks, B. (2018). Interoception: The forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752),
20170143 . 10.1098/rstb.2017.0143 - 43Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 267–269. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007
- 44Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3),
371 . 10.1037//0096-3445.122.3.371 - 45Desai, R. H. (2022). Are metaphors embodied? The neural evidence. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2417–2433. 10.1007/s00426-021-01604-4
- 46Dijkstra, K., & Post, L. (2015). Mechanisms of embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01525
- 47Dils, A. T., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Processing unrelated language can change what you see. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 882–888. 10.3758/PBR.17.6.882
- 48Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.016
- 49Dove, G. (2011). On the need for Embodied and Dis-Embodied Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242
- 50Dove, G. (2014). Thinking in Words: Language as an Embodied Medium of Thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 371–389. 10.1111/tops.12102
- 51Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The Theory Crisis in Psychology: How to Move Forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779–788. 10.1177/1745691620970586
- 52Fanelli, D., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLOS ONE, 8(6),
e66938 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0066938 - 53Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2019). How the body shapes knowledge: Empirical support for embodied cognition. American Psychological Association. 10.1037/0000136-000
- 54Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied, and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13(S1), 161–164. 10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5
- 55Fischer, M. H. (2024).
The embodied cognition approach: Principles and research questions . In Experimental Methods in Embodied Cognition (pp. 3–18). Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003290698-2 - 56Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When Digits Help Digits: Spatial–Numerical Associations Point to Finger Counting as Prime Example of Embodied Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
- 57Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555–556. 10.1038/nn1066
- 58Fischer, M. H., & Coello, Y. (Eds.). (2016). Foundations of embodied cognition: Conceptual and interactive embodiment. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315751962
- 59Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1461–1483. 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515
- 60Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2018). Number concepts: Abstract and embodied. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752),
20170125 . 10.1098/rstb.2017.0125 - 61Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. 10.1080/17470210701623605
- 62Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press.
- 63Fried, E. I. (2017). What are psychological constructs? On the nature and statistical modelling of emotions, intelligence, personality traits and mental disorders. Health Psychology Review, 11(2), 130–134. 10.1080/17437199.2017.1306718
- 64Friedrich, J., Fischer, M. H., & Raab, M. (2024). Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding – the physical world in grounded cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3
- 65Friedrich, J., Raab, M., & Voigt, L. (2025). Grounded cognition and the representation of momentum: abstract concepts modulate mislocalization. Psychological Research, 89(1),
51 . 10.1007/s00426-025-02076-6 - 66Gallagher, S. (2018).
Building a stronger concept of embodiment . In The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 353–364). Oxford University Press, Oxford.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zB1rDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT362&dq=18.+Building+a+Stronger+Concept+of+Embodiment&ots=pg288VCHf3&sig=vLnEGW_XdEl3Oy6oJApWCzp577M - 67Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23–48. 10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z
- 68Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The Brain’s concepts: The role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. 10.1080/02643290442000310
- 69Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003
- 70Gelder, T. van. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5), 615–628. 10.1017/S0140525X98001733
- 71Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001).
Metaphor Is Like Analogy . In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind (pp. 199–254). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1251.003.0010 - 72Gernigon, C., Den Hartigh, R. J. R., Vallacher, R. R., & van Geert, P. L. C. (2024). How the Complexity of Psychological Processes Reframes the Issue of Reproducibility in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(6), 952–977. 10.1177/17456916231187324
- 73Gerring, J. (1999). What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357–393. 10.2307/3235246
- 74Gibbs, R. W. (2005a). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
- 75Gibbs, R. W. (2005b).
The psychological status of image schemas . In B. Hampe & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From Perception to Meaning (pp. 113–136). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.2.113 - 76Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind and Language, 21(3), 434–458. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
- 77Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. 10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
- 78Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. 6(4), 347–378. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347
- 79Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press. 10.4324/9781315740218
- 80Gjelsvik, B., Lovric, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2018). Embodied cognition and emotional disorders: Embodiment and abstraction in understanding depression. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 9(3),
pr.035714 . 10.5127/pr.035714 - 81Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(4), 586–596. 10.1002/wcs.55
- 82Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–922. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
- 83Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002 9:3, 9(3), 558–565. 10.3758/BF03196313
- 84Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 1–26. 10.1080/01638539909545067
- 85Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing Abstract Language Modulates Motor System Activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905–919. 10.1080/17470210701625550
- 86Goldinger, S. D., Papesh, M. H., Barnhart, A. S., Hansen, W. A., & Hout, M. C. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 959–978. 10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1
- 87Goldman, A. I. (1992). In Defense of the Simulation Theory. Mind & Language, 7(1–2), 104–119. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00200.x
- 88Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California: Berkeley.
https://search.proquest.com/openview/5ef8adc96c68b2748706a1d8a4d4208a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y - 89Grady, J. E. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012
- 90Grady, J. E. (2008).
Superschemas and the grammar of metaphorical mappings . In Superschemas and the grammar of metaphorical (pp. 339–360). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199123.2.339 - 91Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377–396. 10.1017/S0140525X04000093
- 92Hagger, M. S. (2014). Avoiding the “déjà-variable” phenomenon: Social psychology needs more guides to constructs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00052
- 93Haig, B. D. (2013). Detecting Psychological Phenomena: Taking Bottom-Up Research Seriously. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 135–153. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135
- 94Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 29, 1–14. 10.1515/9783110197532.0.1
- 95Harnad, S. (1990). The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
- 96Hartley, T., Lever, C., Burgess, N., & O’Keefe, J. (2014). Space in the brain: How the hippocampal formation supports spatial cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1635),
20120510 . 10.1098/rstb.2012.0510 - 97Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
- 98Hesslow, G. (2002). Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 242–247. 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01913-7
- 99Hesslow, G. (2012). The current status of the simulation theory of cognition. Brain Research, 1428, 71–79. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.026
- 100Hofstadter, D. R. (2001).
Analogy as the core of cognition . In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 499–538). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1251.003.0020 - 101Holyoak, K. J. (2012).
Analogy and Relational Reasoning . In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (1st ed., pp. 234–259). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0013 - 102Horchak, O. V., Giger, J.-C., Cabral, M., & Pochwatko, G. (2014). From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems Research, 29–30, 66–85. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.09.002
- 103Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2012). Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018548.001.0001
- 104Ibáñez, A., Kühne, K., Miklashevsky, A., Monaco, E., Muraki, E., Ranzini, M., Speed, L. J., & Tuena, C. (2023). Ecological Meanings: A Consensus Paper on Individual Differences and Contextual Influences in Embodied Language. Journal of Cognition, 6(1),
59 . 10.5334/joc.228 - 105Indurkhya, B. (2013). Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
- 106James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. H. Holt. 10.1037/10538-000
- 107James, W. (1897). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy: Human Immortality. Dover Publications Inc. 10.2307/2175898
- 108Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089. 10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0
- 109Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition. NeuroImage, 14(1), S103–S109. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
- 110Jin, H., Zhou, G., & Li, X. (2024). The influence of sentence focus on mental simulation: A possible cause of ACE instability. Memory & Cognition. 10.3758/s13421-024-01549-0
- 111Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
- 112Johnson, M. (2018).
The Embodiment of Language . In A. Newen, L. De Bruin & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (pp. 622–640). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.33 - 113Jones, S. M., Zaslow, M., Darling-Churchill, K. E., & Halle, T. G. (2016). Assessing early childhood social and emotional development: Key conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 45, 42–48. 10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.008
- 114Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an Embodiment of Importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169–1174. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02426.x
- 115Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79–B89. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.005
- 116Kaup, B., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Bryce, D., Butz, M. V., Dignath, D., Dudschig, C., Franz, V. H., Friedrich, C., Gawrilow, C., Heller, J., Huff, M., Hütter, M., Janczyk, M., Leuthold, H., Mallot, H., Nürk, H.-C., Ramscar, M., Said, N., … Wong, H. Y. (2024). Modal and amodal cognition: An overarching principle in various domains of psychology. Psychological Research, 88(2), 307–337. 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w
- 117Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. World Book Company.
- 118Kemmerer, D. (2022). Grounded Cognition Entails Linguistic Relativity: A Neglected Implication of a Major Semantic Theory. Topics in Cognitive Science,
tops.12628 . 10.1111/tops.12628 - 119Kiefer, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2013).
Grounding the Human Conceptual System in Perception, Action, and Internal States . In W. Prinz, M. Beisert & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action Science (pp. 381–407). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.0015 - 120Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805–825. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
- 121Kim, J., & Maher, M. L. (2020). Conceptual Metaphors for Designing Smart Environments: Device, Robot, and Friend. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00198
- 122Kimmel, M. (2009). Analyzing Image Schemas in Literature. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(s1), 159–188. 10.1515/cogsem.2009.5.fall2009.159
- 123Kitcher, P. (1995). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0195096533.001.0001
- 124Klein, S. B. (2014). What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology? Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 326–338. 10.1177/0959354314529616
- 125Körner, A., Castillo, M., Drijvers, L., Fischer, M., Guenther, F., Marelli, M., Platonova, O., Rinaldi, L., Shaki, S., Trujillo, J., & Glenberg, A. (2023). Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/4m5a9
- 126Körner, A., Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2016). Routes to embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(July), 1–10. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00940
- 127Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. 10.1037/a0021446
- 128Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 168–184. 10.1075/arcl.6.08kov
- 129Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. 10.1515/cog-2016-0052
- 130Kövecses, Z. (2020a). An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 112–130. 10.1075/rcl.00053.kov
- 131Kövecses, Z. (2020b). Force dynamics, conceptual metaphor theory, emotion concepts. Handbook of Cognitive Semantics, Forthcoming.
- 132Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
https://cte.univ-setif2.dz/moodle/pluginfile.php/13602/mod_glossary/attachment/1620/Kuhn_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions.pdf - 133Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020). Task-Dependent Recruitment of Modality-Specific and Multimodal Regions during Conceptual Processing. Cerebral Cortex, 30(7), 3938–3959. 10.1093/cercor/bhaa010
- 134Łącka-Badura, J. (2016). Metaphorical conceptualization of success in American success books, aphorisms and quotes. Lingua Posnaniensis, 58(1), 39–54. 10.1515/linpo-2016-0003
- 135Lakatos, I. (1976).
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes . In S. G. Harding (Ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 205–259). Springer, Netherlands. 10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14 - 136Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
- 137Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
- 138Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining Embodied Cognition Results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
- 139Lakoff, G. (2014).
Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason . Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958 - 140Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. 10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
- 141Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books.
- 142Landau, M., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. 10.1037/a0020970
- 143Landau, M., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (Eds.). (2014). The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. American Psychological Association. 10.1037/14278-000
- 144Langacker, R. W. (1986). An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 1–40. 10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1
- 145Lebois, L. A. M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Simmons, W. K., Barrett, L. F., & Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Learning situated emotions. Neuropsychologia, 145,
106637 . 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.008 - 146Locke, E. A. (2003). Good definitions: The epistemological foundation of scientific progress. Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science, 395–425.
- 147Loeffler, J., Raab, M., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2017). Walking back to the future: The impact of walking backward and forward on spatial and temporal concepts. Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 346–358. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000377
- 148Logie, R. H. (2023). Strategies, debates, and adversarial collaboration in working memory: The 51st Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(11), 2431–2460. 10.1177/17470218231194037
- 149Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273–302. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
- 150Ludwin-Peery, E., Bramley, N. R., Davis, E., & Gureckis, T. M. (2021). Limits on simulation approaches in intuitive physics. Cognitive Psychology, 127,
101396 . 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101396 - 151Lykken, D. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology anyway. Thinking Clearly about Psychology, 1, 3–39.
- 152Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1271–1291. 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
- 153Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1), 59–70. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004
- 154Mandler, J. M., & Pagán Cánovas, C. (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 6(4), 510–532. 10.1017/langcog.2014.14
- 155Maner, J. K. (2014). Let’s Put Our Money Where Our Mouth Is: If Authors Are to Change Their Ways, Reviewers (and Editors) Must Change With Them. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 343–351. 10.1177/1745691614528215
- 156Martin, A. (2016). GRAPES—Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 979–990. 10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3
- 157Mayo-Wilson, E., Grant, S., Supplee, L., Kianersi, S., Amin, A., DeHaven, A., & Mellor, D. (2021). Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: The TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(1),
9 . 10.1186/s41073-021-00112-8 - 158Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the Sunny Side Is Up: Associations Between Affect and Vertical Position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
- 159Merritt, D. J., Casasanto, D., & Brannon, E. M. (2010). Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition, 117(2), 191–202. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011
- 160Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
- 161Michel, C. (2023).
Towards a new standard model of concepts? In: G. Dove, (Ed.), Abstract concepts and the embodied mind: Rethinking grounded cognition (p. 280) Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, $74.00, ISBN 9780190061975. Philosophical Psychology, 0(0), 1–5. 10.1080/09515089.2023.2177144 - 162Morey, R. D., Kaschak, M. P., Díez-Álamo, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., Zwaan, R. A., Lakens, D., Ibáñez, A., García, A., Gianelli, C., Jones, J. L., Madden, J., Alifano, F., Bergen, B., Bloxsom, N. G., Bub, D. N., Cai, Z. G., Chartier, C. R., Chatterjee, A., Conwell, E., … Ziv-Crispel, N. (2022). A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(2), 613–626. 10.3758/s13423-021-01927-8
- 163Morrison, F. J., & Grammer, J. K. (2016). Conceptual clutter and measurement mayhem: Proposals for cross-disciplinary integration in conceptualizing and measuring executive function.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-31283-015 - 164Muraki, E. J., Speed, L. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2023). Insights into embodied cognition and mental imagery from aphantasia. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1–15. 10.1038/s44159-023-00221-9
- 165Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221–229. 10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1
- 166Myachykov, A., Scheepers, C., Fischer, M. H., & Kessler, K. (2014). TEST: A Tropic, Embodied, and Situated Theory of Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 442–460. 10.1111/tops.12024
- 167Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
- 168Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science (New York, N.Y.), 348(6242), 1422–1425. 10.1126/science.aab2374
- 169Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline Struhl, M., Nuijten, M. B., Rohrer, J. M., Romero, F., Scheel, A. M., Scherer, L. D., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Vazire, S. (2022). Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 719–748. 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157
- 170Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. 10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
- 171Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2009). The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories.
https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/incommensurability/#RevParThoKuhInc - 172Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251),
aac4716 . 10.1126/science.aac4716 - 173Ostarek, M., & Bottini, R. (2021). Towards strong inference in research on embodiment–possibilities and limitations of causal paradigms. Journal of Cognition, 4(1). 10.5334/joc.139
- 174Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Six Challenges for Embodiment Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593–599. 10.1177/0963721419866441
- 175Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford university press.
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=hLGmKkh_4K8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Mental+representations:+A+dual+coding+approach&ots=B6z0aAjjpr&sig=htI3v9_9X3sfM3xSpZ7_1rt4maM - 176Papesh, M. H. (2015). Just out of reach: On the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6),
e116 . 10.1037/xge0000125 - 177Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(12), 976–987. 10.1038/nrn2277
- 178Pecher, D. (2018). Curb Your Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 501–517. 10.1111/tops.12311
- 179Pecher, D., Boot, I., & Van Dantzig, S. (2011).
Abstract concepts: Sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond . In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 217–248). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00007-3 - 180Pecher, D., & Zeelenberg, R. (2018). Boundaries to grounding abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752),
20170132 . 10.1098/rstb.2017.0132 - 181Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs. Psychological Science, 14(2), 119–124. 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429
- 182Pexman, P. M. (2019). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1274–1283. 10.1080/23273798.2017.1303522
- 183Pezzulo, G. (2017). Tracing the Roots of Cognition in Predictive Processing. MIND Group, Philosophy and Predictive Processing. 10.15502/9783958573215
- 184Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2013). Computational Grounded Cognition: A new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612 - 185Pezzulo, G., Candidi, M., Dindo, H., & Barca, L. (2013). Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(3), 270–290. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.01.004
- 186Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 115–131. 10.1007/s10339-007-0164-0
- 187Pezzulo, G., D’Amato, L., Mannella, F., Priorelli, M., Van de Maele, T., Stoianov, I. P., & Friston, K. J. (2024). Neural representation in active inference: Using generative models to interact with—and understand—the lived world. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1534(1), 45–68. 10.1111/nyas.15118
- 188Pezzulo, G., Parr, T., Cisek, P., Clark, A., & Friston, K. J. (2024). Generating meaning: Active inference and the scope and limits of passive AI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(2), 97–112. 10.1016/j.tics.2023.10.002
- 189Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong Inference. Science, 146(3642), 347–353. 10.1126/science.146.3642.347
- 190Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2016). Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 159–203. 10.1177/1094428115624965
- 191Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. 10.1063/1.3060577
- 192Prado, J., & Knops, A. (2024). Spatial attention in mental arithmetic: A literature review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(5), 2036–2057. 10.3758/s13423-024-02499-z
- 193Prinz, J. J. (2012). Beyond human nature: How culture and experience shape the human mind (pp. xii, 402). W W Norton & Co.
- 194Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(5), 351–360. 10.1038/nrn2811
- 195Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/2004.001.0001
- 196Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (2022). The Best Game in Town: The Re-Emergence of the Language of Thought Hypothesis Across the Cognitive Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–55. 10.1017/S0140525X22002849
- 197Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597954
- 198Reilly, J., Shain, C., Borghesani, V., Kuhnke, P., Vigliocco, G., Peelle, J. E., Mahon, B., Buxbaum, L., Majid, A., Brysbaert, M., Borghi, A. M., De Deyne, S., Dove, G., Papeo, L., Pexman, P. M., Poeppel, D., Lupyan, G., Boggio, P., Hickock, G., … Vinson, D. (2023). What we mean when we say semantic: A Consensus statement on the nomenclature of semantic memory [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/xrnb2
- 199Reinboth, T., & Farkaš, I. (2022). Ultimate Grounding of Abstract Concepts: A Graded Account. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), Article
1 . 10.5334/joc.214 - 200Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 767–780. 10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4
- 201Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. J. (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 23(23).
- 202Rozin, P. (2001). Social Psychology and Science: Some Lessons From Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_1
- 203Schwartz, S. P. (1980). Natural Kinds and Nominal Kinds. Mind, 89(354), 182–195. 10.1093/mind/LXXXIX.354.182
- 204Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
- 205Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2024). How do numbers shift spatial attention? Both processing depth and counting habits matter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(1), 171–183. 10.1037/xge0001493
- 206Shanton, K., & Goldman, A. (2010). Simulation theory. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(4), 527–538. 10.1002/wcs.33
- 207Shapiro, L. A. (2007). The Embodied Cognition Research Programme. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 338–346. 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x
- 208Shapiro, L. A. (2019). Embodied Cognition. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180380
- 209Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The Similarity-In-Topography Principle: Reconciling Theories Of Conceptual Deficits. 10.1080/02643290342000032
- 210Simonyi, K. (2012). A Cultural History of Physics. CRC Press.
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=4742624 - 211Steels, L. (2008).
The Symbol Grounding Problem Has Been Solved. So What’s Next? In M. Vega (Ed.), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0012 - 212Svensson, H., Morse, A. F., & Ziemke, T. (2009).
Neural Pathways of Embodied Simulation . In G. Pezzulo, M. V. Butz, O. Sigaud & G. Baldassarre (Eds.), Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems (Vol. 5499, pp. 95–114). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-02565-5_6 - 213Talmy, L. (1983). How Language Structures Space. In SPATIAL ORIENTATION: Theory, Research, and Application. 10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11
- 214Taniguchi, T., Nagai, T., Nakamura, T., Iwahashi, N., Ogata, T., & Asoh, H. (2016). Symbol Emergence in Robotics: A Survey. Advanced Robotics, 30(11–12), 706–728. 10.1080/01691864.2016.1164622
- 215Teskey, M., Svendsen, K., Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2024). On the nature of action–sentence compatibility effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10.1037/xlm0001327
- 216Thibodeau, P. H., Matlock, T., & Flusberg, S. J. (2019). The role of metaphor in communication and thought. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(5),
e12327 . 10.1111/lnc3.12327 - 217Tolentino-Castro, J. W., & Raab, M. (2021). Intellectual Disabilities Behavior Under the Lens of Embodied Cognition Approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620083
- 218Törneke, N. (2020). Strategies for using metaphor in psychological treatment. Metaphor and the Social World, 10(2), 214–232. 10.1075/msw.00004.tor
- 219Trafimow, D., & Earp, B. D. (2016). Badly specified theories are not responsible for the replication crisis in social psychology: Comment on Klein. Theory & Psychology, 26(4), 540–548. 10.1177/0959354316637136
- 220Van Elk, M., & Bekkering, H. (2018).
The Embodiment of Concepts: Theoretical Perspectives and the Role of Predictive Processing . In A. Newen, L. De Bruin & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (pp. 640–660). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.34 - 221van Rooij, I. (2019).
Psychological science needs theory development before preregistration . Psychonomic Society Featured Content.https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/psychological-science-needs-theory-development-before-preregistration/ - 222Versace, R., Vallet, G. T., Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Labeye, É., & Brunel, L. (2014). Act-In: An integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 280–306. 10.1080/20445911.2014.892113
- 223Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 219–247. 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.011
- 224Wegner, D. M. (1992). The Premature Demise of the Solo Experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(4), 504–508. 10.1177/0146167292184017
- 225Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children’s concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,
506 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00506 - 226Werner, K., Raab, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2019). Moving arms: The effects of sensorimotor information on the problem-solving process. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(2), 171–191. 10.1080/13546783.2018.1494630
- 227Williams, D. (2018). Predictive Processing and the Representation Wars. Minds and Machines, 28(1), 141–172. 10.1007/s11023-017-9441-6
- 228Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. 10.3758/BF03196322
- 229Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1105–1127. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032
- 230Winter, A., Dudschig, C., Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Kaup, B. (2022). The action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE): Meta-analysis of a benchmark finding for embodiment. Acta Psychologica, 230,
103712 . 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103712 - 231Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2017). Primary Metaphors Are Both Cultural and Embodied. In Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 99–115). 10.1017/9781108182324.007
- 232Winter, B., Matlock, T., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Mental number space in three dimensions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 209–219. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.005
- 233Wulff, D. U., & Mata, R. (2023). Automated jingle–jangle detection: Using embeddings to tackle taxonomic incommensurability. 10.31234/osf.io/9h7aw
- 234Wyer
Jr , R. S. (2018). The role of mindsets, productions, and perceptual symbols in goal-directed information processing. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 90–106. 10.1002/arcp.1005 - 235Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034. 10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x
- 236Zwaan, R. A. (2021). Two Challenges to “Embodied Cognition” Research And How to Overcome Them. Journal of Cognition, 4(1),
14 . 10.5334/joc.151