References
- 1Akaike, H. (1973). Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika, 60, 255–265. 10.1093/biomet/60.2.255
- 2Amenta, S., Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2020). A (distributional) semantic perspective on the processing of morphologically complex words. The Mental Lexicon, 15(1), 62–78. 10.1075/ml.00014.ame
- 3Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1587. 10.1037/xlm0000104
- 4Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
- 5Aronoff, M., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1978). Testing morphological productivity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 318(1), 106–114. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb16357.x
- 6Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- 7Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. 10.21500/20112084.807
- 8Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological review, 118(3), 438. 10.1037/a0023851
- 9Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., … & Grothendieck, G. (2011). Package ‘lme4’. Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version, 1(6).
- 10Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Virkkala, M. M. (2000). The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287–296. 10.1111/1467-9450.00201
- 11Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2015). Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22(4), 1054–1061. 10.3758/s13423-014-0752-9
- 12Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2016). Embedded stem priming effects in prefixed and suffixed pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 220–230. 10.1080/10888438.2016.1140769
- 13Beyersmann, E., Mousikou, P., Javourey-Drevet, L., Schroeder, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2020). Morphological processing across modalities and languages. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(6), 500–519. 10.1080/10888438.2020.1730847
- 14Bosch, S., & Clahsen, H. (2016). Accessing morphosyntax in L1 and L2 word recognition: A priming study of inflected German adjectives. The Mental Lexicon, 11(1), 26–54. 10.1075/ml.11.1.02bos
- 15Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370. 10.1007/BF02294361
- 16Bridges, D., Pitiot, A., MacAskill, M. R., & Peirce, J. W. (2020). The timing mega-study: Comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online. PeerJ, 8,
e9414 . 10.7717/peerj.9414 - 17Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1116. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116
- 18Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. 10.1177/0963721417727521
- 19Burani, C., Dovetto, F. M., Spuntarelli, A., & Thornton, A. M. (1999). Morpholexical access and naming: The semantic interpretability of new root–suffix combinations. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 333–339. 10.1006/brln.1999.2073
- 20Burani, C., Dovetto, F. M., Thornton, A. M., & Laudanna, A. (1997).
Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo-words . In Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 55–72). Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_5 - 21Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and language, 81(1–3), 568–586. 10.1006/brln.2001.2548
- 22Burani, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2003). The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 151, 157–208. 10.1515/9783110910186.157
- 23Casalis, S., Commissaire, E., & Duncan, L. G. (2015). Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 186–201. 10.1080/17586801.2014.976165
- 24Casalis, S., Quémart, P., & Duncan, L. G. (2015). How language affects children’s use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: Evidence from a cross-language study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 452. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00452
- 25Crepaldi, D., Amenta, S., Pawel, M., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015, September). SUBTLEX-IT. Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Italian. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Italian Association For Experimental Psychology (pp. 10–12).
- 26Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., & Davis, C. J. (2010). Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes. Memory & cognition, 38, 312–321. 10.3758/MC.38.3.312
- 27Dal Maso, S., & Giraudo, H. (2014). Morphological processing in L2 Italian: Evidence from a masked priming study. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 37(2), 322–337. 10.1075/li.37.2.09mas
- 28Dawson, N., Rastle, K., & Ricketts, J. (2018). Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 645. 10.1037/xlm0000485
- 29Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(6), 432–451. 10.1080/10888438.2014.926907
- 30Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 344–358. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
- 31Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(3), 405–440. 10.1017/S0142716409090213
- 32Farhy, Y., Verissimo, J., & Clahsen, H. (2018). Universal and particular in morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 1125–1133. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310917
- 33Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992).
Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity . In Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165–183). Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_10 - 34Gatti, D., Marelli, M., & Rinaldi, L. (2022). Out-of-vocabulary but not meaningless: Evidence for semantic-priming effects in pseudoword processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 10.1037/xge0001304
- 35Grainger, J., & Beyersman, E. (2017).
Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation . In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 67. The psychology of learning and motivation (p. 285–317). Elsevier Academic Press. 10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.009 - 36Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2020). Trying to make it work: Compositional effects in the processing of compound “nonwords”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(7), 1082–1091. 10.1177/1747021820902019
- 37Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S. (2016). Masked morphological priming in German-speaking adults and children: Evidence from response time distributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 929. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00929
- 38Hasenäcker, J., Solaja, O., & Crepaldi, D. (2020). Food in the corner and money in the cashews: Semantic activation of embedded stems in the presence or absence of a morphological structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(1), 155–161. 10.3758/s13423-019-01664-z
- 39Hasenäcker, J., Solaja, O., & Crepaldi, D. (2021). Does morphological structure modulate access to embedded word meaning in child readers?. Memory & Cognition, 49, 1334–1347. 10.3758/s13421-021-01164-3
- 40Hendrix, P., & Sun, C. C. (2021). A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(1), 157. 10.1037/xlm0000819
- 41Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 434–446. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
- 42Jarmulowicz, L., Hay, S. E., Taran, V. L., & Ethington, C. A. (2008). Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 275–297. 10.1007/s11145-007-9073-y
- 43Kimppa, L., Shtyrov, Y., Hut, S. C., Hedlund, L., Leminen, M., & Leminen, A. (2019). Acquisition of L2 morphology by adult language learners. Cortex, 116, 74–90. 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.012
- 44Kirkici, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 16, 776–791. 10.1017/S1366728912000648
- 45Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software, 82, 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- 46Li, J., Taft, M., & Xu, J. (2017). The Processing of English Derived Words by Chinese-English Bilinguals. Language Learning, 67(4), 858–884. 10.1111/lang.12247
- 47Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26–41. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
- 48Marelli, M., Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1571–1583. 10.1080/17470218.2014.959709
- 49Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological review, 122(3), 485. 10.1037/a0039267
- 50Marelli, M., Traficante, D., & Burani, C. (2020). Reading morphologically complex words: Experimental evidence and learning models. Word Knowledge and Word Usage, 553. 10.1515/9783110440577-014
- 51Menut, A., Brysbaert, M., & Casalis, S. (2022). Derivational awareness in late bilinguals increases along with proficiency without a clear influence of the suffixes shared with L1. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–14. 10.1017/S1366728922000402
- 52Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior research methods, 51, 195–203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- 53Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
- 54Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2007). Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 135–156. 10.1017/S014271640607007X
- 55R Core Team. (2021).
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/ - 56Schmidtke, D., Rahmanian, S., & Moro, A. L. (2022). Morphological knowledge in English learner university students is sensitive to language statistics: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(4), 889–919. 10.1017/S0142716422000182
- 57Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. 10.1214/aos/1176344136
- 58Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
- 59Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). How do roots and suffixes influence reading of pseudowords: A study of young Italian readers with and without dyslexia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 777–793. 10.1080/01690965.2010.496553
- 60White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 6(2), 129–141. 10.1017/S1366728903001081