References
- 1Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678–723. 10.1037/0033-295x.105.4.678-723
- 2Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior research methods, 52, 388–407. 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
- 3Bowers, J. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83–99. 10.3758/BF03210726
- 4Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1, 9. 10.5334/joc.10
- 5Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
- 6Chauncey, K., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). Code-switching effects in bilingual word recognition: A masked priming study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 105, 161–174. 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.006
- 7Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335–341. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
- 9Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279. 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251
- 8Gontijo, P. F., Rayman, J., Zhang, S., & Zaidel, E. (2002). How brand names are special: brands, words, and hemispheres. Brain and Language, 82, 327–343. 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00036-6
- 10Gontijo, P. F., & Zhang, S. (2007).
The mental representation of brand names: Are brand names a class by themselves? In T. M. Lowrey (Ed.), Psycholinguistic Phenomena in Marketing Communications (pp. 23–37). Erlbaum. - 11Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A mid-level vision of reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 335–359. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
- 12Grainger, J., & Dufau, S. (2012).
The front-end of visual word recognition . In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual Word Recognition Vol. 1: Models and Methods, Orthography and Phonology (pp. 159–184). Psychology Press. - 13Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Dufau, S. (2008). Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 381–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.006
- 14Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2022). The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study. Cognition, 218, 104938. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104938
- 15Henderson, L., & Chard, J. (1976). On the nature of the facilitation of visual comparisons by lexical membership. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 432–434. 10.3758/bf03337238
- 16Jacoby, L. L., & Hayman, C. A. (1987). Specific visual transfer in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 456–463. 10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.456
- 17Jamieson, R. K., Johns, B. T., Vokey, J. R., & Jones, M. N. (2022). Instance theory as a domain-general framework for cognitive psychology. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(3), 174–183. 10.1038/s44159-022-00025-3
- 18Kwantes, P. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1999). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 306–315. 10.1037/h0087318
- 19Labusch, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Perea, M. (2024a). Visual word identification beyond common words: The role of font and letter case in brand names. Memory and Cognition, 1–14. 10.3758/s13421-024-01570-3
- 20Labusch, M., Kotz, S. A., & Perea, M. (2022). The impact of capitalized German words on lexical access. Psychological Research, 86, 891–902. 10.1007/s00426-021-01540-3
- 21Labusch, M., Perea, M., Rocabado, F., Marcet, A., Fernández-López, M., Civera, T., & Vergara-Martínez, M. (2024b). Tracking the brain signature of (mis)spelled logotypes via letter transpositions and replacements. Scientific Reports, 14, 18538. 10.1038/s41598-024-69525-x
- 22Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2018). Package “Emmeans”. R Package Version 4.0-3.
http://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans - 23Marsolek, C. J. (2004). Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: A subsystems resolution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section, 57A, 1233–1259. 10.1080/02724980343000747
- 24Pathak, A., Velasco, C., & Calvert, G. A. (2019). Identifying counterfeit brand logos: On the importance of the first and last letters of a logotype. European Journal of Marketing, 53, 2109–2125. 10.1108/EJM-09-2017-0586
- 25Perea, M., Baciero, A., Labusch, M., Fernández-López, M., & Marcet, A. (2022). Are brand names special words? Letter visual similarity affects the identification of brand names, but not common words. British Journal of Psychology, 113, 835–852. 10.1111/bjop.12557
- 26Perea, M., Baciero, A., Rocabado, F., & Marcet, A. (2021). Does the cowl make the monk? Detecting counterfeits in brand names vs. logos. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28, 969–977. 10.3758/s13423-020-01863-z
- 27Perea, M., Jiménez, M., Talero, F., & López-Cañada, S. (2015). Letter-case information and the identification of brand names. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 162–173. 10.1111/bjop.12071
- 28Perea, M., Labusch, M., Fernández-López, M., Marcet, A., Gutierrez-Sigut, E., & Gomez, P. (2024). One more trip to Barcetona: On the special status of visual similarity effect in city names. Psychological Research, 88, 271–283. 10.1007/s00426-023-01839-3
- 29Perea, M., & Panadero, V. (2014). Does viotin activate violin more than viocin? On the use of visual cues during visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology, 61, 23–29. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000223
- 30Peressotti, F., Cubelli, R., & Job, R. (2003). On recognizing proper names: The orthographic cue hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 87–116. 10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00004-5
- 31Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
- 32R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org - 33Reichle, E. D., Veldre, A., Yu, L., & Andrews, S. (2022).
A neural implementation of MINERVA 2 . Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. - 34Rocabado, F., Perea, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2023). Misspelled logotypes: the hidden threat to brand identity. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 17817. 10.1038/s41598-023-45213-0
- 35Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 853–862. 10.1038/nrn1534
- 36Simpson, I. C., Mousikou, P., Montoya, J. M., & Defior, S. (2012). A letter visual-similarity matrix for Latin-based alphabets. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 431–439. 10.3758/s13428-012-0271-4
- 37Sulpizio, S., & Job, R. (2018). Early and multiple-loci divergency of proper and common names: An event-related potential investigation. Neuropsychologia, 119, 107–117. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.034
- 38Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339–363. 10.3758/BF03210972
- 39Vergara-Martínez, M., Gómez, P., Jiménez, M., & Perea, M. (2015). Lexical enhancement during prime–target integration: ERP evidence from matched-case identity priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 492–504. 10.3758/s13415-014-0330-7
- 40Wimmer, H., Ludersdorfer, P., Richlan, F., & Kronbichler, M. (2016). Visual experience shapes orthographic representations in the visual word form area. Psychological Science, 27, 1240–1248. 10.1177/0956797616657319