References
- 1Augustinova, M., Parris, B. A., & Ferrand, L. (2019). The loci of Stroop interference and facilitation effects with manual and vocal responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1786. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01786
- 2Bench, C. J., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Friston, K. J., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1993). Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia, 31(9), 907–922. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90147-R
- 3Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1255–1265. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0
- 4Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1995). Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. NeuroImage, 2(4), 264–272. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1034
- 5Chen, A., Bailey, K., Tiernan, B. N., & West, R. (2011). Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2–1 mapping Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80(2), 129–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.012
- 6Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press.
- 7De Houwer, J. (2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31(3), 353–359. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194393
- 8Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
- 9Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1170–1176. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1170
- 10Graf, P., Squire, L. R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 164–178. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.164
- 11Hasshim, N., & Parris, B. A. (2015). Assessing stimulus–stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2601–2610. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0971-9
- 12Henik, A., Bugg, J. M., & Goldfarb, L. (2018). Inspired by the past and looking to the future of the Stroop effect. Acta Psychologica, 189, 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.007
- 13Hershman, R., & Henik, A. (2019). Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 45(10), 1899–1909. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000690
- 14Hershman, R., & Henik, A. (2020). Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts. Memory and Cognition, 77(8), 2601–2610. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00971-z
- 15Hershman, R., Levin, Y., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2020). Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict. Psychological Research, 85(3), 1084–1092. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01311-6
- 16Hershman, R., Levin, Y., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2021). The contribution of meaning to the detection of task conflict. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(9), 1553–1561. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211001331
- 17Hershman, R., Beckmann, L., Keha, E., Henik, A, & Sapir, A. (2024). Evidence for both task and information conflicts in the color-digit Stroop Task: A pupillometry study. [Manuscript in preparation].
- 18Hershman, R., Beckmann, L., Keha, E., Wagner, M., Kaufmann, L., & Henik, A. (2024). The influence of numerical processing on numerosity processing: evidence from the color-digit Stroop task [Manuscript submitted for publication].
- 19JASP Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.18.3.0) [computer software]. Retrieved from
https://jasp-stats.org/ - 20Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd edition). Oxford University Press.
- 21Kalanthroff, E., Davelaar, E. J., Henik, A., Goldfarb, L., & Usher, M. (2018). Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 125(1), 59–82. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000083
- 22Kalanthroff, E., & Henik, A. (2013). Individual but not fragile: Individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 413–419. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.010
- 23Keha, E., & Kalanthroff, E. (2023). What is word? The boundary conditions of task conflict in the Stroop task. Psychological Research, 87(4), 1208–1218. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01738-z
- 24Kinoshita, S., Mills, L., & Norris, D. (2018). The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(11), 1730–1742. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000552
- 25Levin, Y., & Tzelgov, J. (2014). Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their “control.” Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 463. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00463
- 26Littman, R., Keha, E., & Kalanthroff, E. (2019). Task conflict and task control: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1598. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01598
- 27MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- 28Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (Eds.). (2002). Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195123005.001.0001
- 29Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 137–151. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195748
- 30Moretti, L., Koch, I., Steinhauser, M., & Schuch, S. (2023). Stimulus-triggered task conflict affects task-selection errors in task switching: A Bayesian multinomial processing tree modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 50(2), 230–243. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001245
- 31Parris, B. A. (2014). Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1182. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01182
- 32Parris, B. A., Hasshim, N., Ferrand, L., & Augustinova, M. (2023). Do task sets compete in the Stroop task and other selective attention paradigms? Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 1–32. DOI: 10.5334/joc.272
- 33Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- 34Shichel, I., & Tzelgov, J. (2018). Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect. Acta Psychologica, 189, 93–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.007
- 35Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., Van De Moortele, P. F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: A brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. Brain, 123(11), 2240–2255. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2240
- 36Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. G. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210(4473), 1033–1035. DOI: 10.1126/science.7434014
- 37Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1398–1412. DOI: 10.1037/a0016467
- 38Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
- 39Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101(1), 80–102. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.80
- 40van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 27(3), 497–504. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.042
- 41Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46(4), 361–413. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
- 42Xu, F. (2003). Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition, 89(1), B15–B25. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00050-7
- 43Zlotnick, E., Dzikiewicz, A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2015). Minno. js (Version 0.3) [Computer software].