References
- Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
- Berch, D. B., Krikorian, R., & Huha, E. M. (1998). The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Methodological and Theoretical Considerations. Brain and Cognition, 38(3), 317–338. DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1998.1039
- Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Capacities underlying word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(2), 67–73. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01121-8
- Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
- Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
- Brysbaert, M., Sui, L., Dirix, N., & Hintz, F. (2020). Dutch Author Recognition Test. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 6. DOI: 10.5334/joc.95
- Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2013).
The role of working memory in language comprehension . In Complex information processing (pp. 51–88). Psychology Press. - Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 694–709. DOI: 10.1037/a0033861
- Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
- Constantin, M. A., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2022). Sample Size Recommendations for Estimating Cross-Sectional Network Models. OSF. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZKAXU
- Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2), 163–183. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00096-4
- Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). The word frequency effect in first-and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 843–863. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.720994
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd Edition). American Guidance Service. DOI: 10.1037/t15145-000
- Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2018). Speech perception. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 1–46. DOI: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn301
- Engelhardt, P. E., Nigg, J. T., & Ferreira, F. (2017). Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An individual differences investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1263–1281. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785
- Epskamp, S. (2015). New Features in qgraph. [R Package].
- Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
- Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617–634. DOI: 10.1037/met0000167
- Favier, S., & Huettig, F. (2021). Long-term written language experience affects grammaticality judgments and usage but not priming of spoken sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(8), 1378–1395. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211005228
- Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513–543. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716406060383
- Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Auditory lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 559–568. DOI: 10.1080/016909696386944
- Goring, S. A., Schmank, C. J., Kane, M. J., & Conway, A. R. (2021). Psychometric models of individual differences in reading comprehension: A reanalysis of Freed, Hamilton, and Long (2017). Journal of Memory and Language, 119, 104221. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104221
- Goswami, S., Das, A. K., & Nandy, S. C. (2021). Sparsity of weighted networks: Measures and applications. Information Sciences, 577, 557–578. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.090
- Hadar, B., Skrzypek, J. E., Wingfield, A., & Ben-David, B. M. (2016). Working Memory Load Affects Processing Time in Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye-Movements. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00221
- Hintz, F., Dijkhuis, M., van ‘t Hoff, V., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2020b). A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills. Scientific Data, 7(1), 429. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00758-x
- Hintz, F., Dijkhuis, M., van ‘t Hoff, V., Huijsmans, M., Kievit, R. A., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (in prep.). Assessing the principal dimensions of speaking and listening skills.
- Hintz, F., Jongman, S. R., Dijkhuis, M., van ’t Hoff, V., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2020a). Shared lexical access processes in speaking and listening? An individual differences study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(6), 1048–1063. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000768
- Hintz, F., Voeten, C., McQueen, J., & Meyer, A. (2022). Quantifying the relationships between linguistic experience, general cognitive skills and linguistic processing skills. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2022) (pp. 2491–2496).
Cognitive Science Society . - Hubers, F., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Dijkstra, T. (2019). Normative Data of Dutch Idiomatic Expressions: Subjective Judgments You Can Bank on. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01075
- Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 80–93. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459
- Huettig, F., & Pickering, M. J. (2019). Literacy Advantages Beyond Reading: Prediction of Spoken Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 464–475. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.008
- Kessels, R. P. C., van den Berg, E., Ruis, C., & Brands, A. M. A. (2008). The Backward Span of the Corsi Block-Tapping Task and Its Association With the WAIS-III Digit Span. Assessment, 15(4), 426–434. DOI: 10.1177/1073191108315611
- Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
- Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: a new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
- Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665–1692. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560
- Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006
- Klimovich-Gray, A., & Bozic, M. (2019). Domain-general and domain-specific computations in single word processing. NeuroImage, 202, 116112. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116112
- Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3), 151–177. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946
- Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
- Lerche, V., von Krause, M., Voss, A., Frischkorn, G. T., Schubert, A.-L., & Hagemann, D. (2020). Diffusion modeling and intelligence: Drift rates show both domain-general and domain-specific relations with intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(12), 2207–2249. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000774
- Magnuson, J. S., You, H., Luthra, S., Li, M., Nam, H., Escabi, M., Brown, K., Allopenna, P. D., Theodore, R. M., & Monto, N. (2020). EARSHOT: A minimal neural network model of incremental human speech recognition. Cognitive Science, 44(4),
e12823 . DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12823 - Mainz, N., Shao, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Meyer, A. S. (2017). Vocabulary Knowledge Predicts Lexical Processing: Evidence from a Group of Participants with Diverse Educational Backgrounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1164. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.001
- McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
- McQueen, J. M. (1993). Rhyme decisions to spoken words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 210–222. DOI: 10.3758/BF03202734
- McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2019).
Key issues and future directions: Towards a comprehensive cognitive architecture for language use . In P. Hagoort (Ed.), Human language: From genes and brain to behavior (pp. 85–96). MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0009 - Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., & Friedman, N. P. (2000). Assessment of executive functions in clinical setting: Problems and recommendations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 21(2), 169–183. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7563
- Monen, J., Shkaravska, O., Withers, P., van den Heuvel, M., Weustiniak, J., Dirksmeyer, R., & Hintz, F. (in prep.). Timing precision for online studies using the Individual Differences in Language Skills (IDLaS-NL) test battery.
- Nitsan, G., Wingfield, A., Lavie, L., & Ben-David, B. M. (2019). Differences in Working Memory Capacity Affect Online Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements. Trends in Hearing, 23, 31216519839624. DOI: 10.1177/2331216519839624
- Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357–395. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357
- Pattamadilok, C., Perre, L., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 169–179. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21014
- Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual section 4: Advanced progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
- Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
- Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Dutch-III-NL. Amsterdam, NL: Harcourt Assessment BV.
- Schmank, C. J., Goring, S. A., Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. (2019). Psychometric network analysis of the Hungarian WAIS. Journal of Intelligence, 7(3), 21. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence7030021
- Simpson-Kent, I. L., Fuhrmann, D., Bathelt, J., Achterberg, J., Borgeest, G. S., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). Neurocognitive reorganization between crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence and white matter microstructure in two age-heterogeneous developmental cohorts. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 41, 100743. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100743
- Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence” objectively determined and measured. Am. J. Psychol, 15, 201–292. DOI: 10.2307/1412107
- Taft, M., Castles, A., Davis, C., Lazendic, G., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2008). Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 366–379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.002
- Van Der Maas, H. L., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113(4), 842–861. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842
- van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
- Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology. Experimental Psychology, 60(6). DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000218
- Wechsler, D. (2004). WAIS-III (3rd edition). Harcourt Test Publishers.