References
- Dare, N., & Shillcock, R. (2013). Serial and parallel processing in reading: Investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 66, 487–504. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.703212
- Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8051–8056. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216438110
- Hossain, J., & White, A. (2023). The transposed word effect is consistent with serial word recognition and varies with reading speed. Cognition, 238, 105512. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105512
- Huang, K., & Staub, A. (2023). The transposed-word effect does not require parallel word processing: Failure to notice transpositions with serial presentation of words. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 30, 393–400. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02150-9
- JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Version 0.17.2) for Windows.
- Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 21086–21090. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106
- Liu, Z., Li, Y., Cutter, M., Paterson, K., & Wang, J. (2022). A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese. Cognition, 218, 104922. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922
- Liu, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Context but not reading speed modulates transposed-word effects in Chinese reading. Acta psychologica, 215, 103272. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103272
- Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior research methods, 44, 314–324. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
- Milledge, S., Bhatia, N., Mensah-Mcleod, L., et al. (2023). The transposed-word effect provides no unequivocal evidence for parallel processing. Attention, perception & psychophysics. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02721-5
- Mirault, J., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2018). You that read wrong again! A transposed-word effect in grammaticality judgments. Psychological Science, 29, 1922–1929. DOI: 10.1177/0956797618806296
- Mirault, J., Vandendaele, A., Pegado, F., & Grainger, J. (2022). Transposed-word effects when reading serially. PLOS ONE, 17,
e0277116 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277116 - Schotter, E., & Payne, B. (2019). Eye movements and comprehension are important to reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 811–812. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.005
- Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019a). Readers are parallel processors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 537–546. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006
- Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019b). Word position coding in reading is noisy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 609–615. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01574-0
- Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019c). Consciousness is not key in the serial-versus-parallel debate. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 814–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.010
- Snell, J., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2017). Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading. PLOS ONE, 12,
e0173720 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720 - Snell, J., Mirault, J., Theeuwes, J., & Grainger, J. (2023). Readers use word length information to determine word order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49, 753–758.
- Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125, 969–984. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000119
- Snell, J., Vitu, F., & Grainger, J. (2017). Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: Beyond the sub-lexical level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 70, 1984–1996. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1217247