Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Language Analytic Ability, Print Exposure, Memory and Comprehension of Complex Syntax by Adult Native Speakers Cover

Language Analytic Ability, Print Exposure, Memory and Comprehension of Complex Syntax by Adult Native Speakers

Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 278289. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
  2. Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388407. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
  3. Beaman, K. (1984). Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse (Language, Exploring Orality and Literacy), 4580. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  4. Behrens, H. (2017). The role of analogy in language processing and acquisition. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, 215239. DOI: 10.1017/9781316091746.010
  5. Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 82105). Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470757000.ch3
  6. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 4168). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005
  7. Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 349.
  8. Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 175198. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109090275
  9. Brooks, P. J., & Sekerina, I. (2005). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition, 13, 177206. DOI: 10.1207/s15327817la1303_2
  10. Cameron-Faulkner, T., & Noble, C. (2013). A comparison of book text and Child Directed Speech. First Language, 33, 268279. DOI: 10.1177/0142723713487613
  11. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(77–126). DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99001788
  12. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. Second Language Testing Incorporated.
  13. Chalmers, R. P. (2012). “mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment.” Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 129. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
  14. Chipere, N. (2001). Variations in Native Speaker Competence: Implications for First-language Teaching. Language Awareness, 10(2–3), 107124. DOI: 10.1080/09658410108667029
  15. Chipere, N. (2003). Understanding Complex Sentences: Native Speaker Variations in Syntactic Competence. Palgrave. DOI: 10.1057/9780230005884
  16. Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rational Thought. Harper & Row.
  17. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. Pantheon.
  18. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger.
  19. Conti-Ramsden, G., Ullman, M. T., & Lum, J. A. (2015). The relation between receptive grammar and procedural, declarative, and working memory in specific language impairment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1090. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01090
  20. Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769786. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196772
  21. Crain, S., Shankweiler, D., Macaruso, P., & Bar-Shalom, E. (1990). Working memory and comprehension of spoken sentences: Investigations of children with reading disorder. Neuropsychological Impairments of Short-Term Memory, 477508. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511665547.023
  22. Crain, S., Thornton, R., & Murasugi, K. (2009). Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition, 16, 123133. DOI: 10.1080/10489220902769234
  23. Dąbrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, 735766. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.735
  24. Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219253. DOI: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
  25. Dąbrowska, E. (2015). Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 649667). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110292022-033
  26. Dąbrowska, E. (2018). Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition, 178, 222235. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018
  27. Dąbrowska, E. (2019). Experience, Aptitude, and Individual Differences in Linguistic Attainment: A Comparison of Native and Nonnative Speakers. Language Learning, 69(S1), 72100. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12323
  28. Dąbrowska, E. (2021). How writing changes language. In A. Mauranen & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Language Change: The Impact of English as a Lingua Franca (pp. 7594). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108675000.006
  29. Dąbrowska, E., Pascual, E., & Gómez-Estern, B. M. (2022). Literacy improves the comprehension of object relatives. Cognition, 224, 104958. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104958
  30. Dąbrowska, E., Pascual, E., Macias-Gomez-Estern, B., & Llompart, M. (2023). Literacy-related differences in morphological knowledge: A nonce-word study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1136337. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136337
  31. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422433. DOI: 10.3758/BF03214546
  32. DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499533. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100004022
  33. DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413438. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716410000056
  34. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 230248. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x
  35. Favier, S., & Huettig, F. (2021). Are there core and peripheral syntactic structures? Experimental evidence from Dutch native speakers with varying literacy levels. Lingua, 251, 102991. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102991
  36. Favier, S., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2021). Literacy can enhance syntactic prediction in spoken language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 2167. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001042
  37. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2005). Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 581590. DOI: 10.3758/BF03192728
  38. Frizelle, P., Thompson, P. A., McDonald, D., & Bishop, D. V. (2018). Growth in syntactic complexity between four years and adulthood: Evidence from a narrative task. Journal of Child Language, 45(5), 11741197. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000918000144
  39. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1965). Language aptitude, intelligence, and second-language achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(4), 191. DOI: 10.1037/h0022400
  40. Goldwater, M. B. (2017). Grammatical constructions as relational categories. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 776799. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12272
  41. Hamrick, P., Lum, J. A., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(7), 14871492. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713975115
  42. Herbst, T., & Hoffmann, T. (under review). A Construction Grammar of the English language. CASA – Constructionist Approach to Linguistic Description.
  43. Hjetland, H. N., Lervåg, A., Lyster, S.-A. H., Hagtvet, B. E., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2019). Pathways to reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 751. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000321
  44. Huang, Y., & Ferreira, F. (2020). The application of signal detection theory to acceptability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073
  45. Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Language Proficiency in Native and Non-native Speakers: Theory and Research. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.41
  46. Indefrey, P. (2002). Listen und Regeln. Erwerb und Repräsentation der schwachen Substantivdeklination des Deutchen [PhD Thesis]. Heinrich Heine Universität.
  47. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122149. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
  48. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.773
  49. Kaplan, D., & Berman, R. (2015). Developing linguistic flexibility across the school years. First Language, 35, 2753. DOI: 10.1177/0142723714566335
  50. Karanth, P., Kudva, A., & Vijayan, A. (1995). Literacy and linguistic awareness. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and Reading. A Comparative Approach (pp. 303316). Erlbaum, UK: Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781315111810-15
  51. Karlsson, F. (2009). Origin and maintenance of clausal embedding complexity. In G. Sampson, D. Gil, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable (pp. 192202). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1037/a0025405
  52. Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 154169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006
  53. Kidd, E., & Kirjavainen, M. (2011). Investigating the contribution of procedural and declarative memory to the acquisition of past tense morphology: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 794829. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.493735
  54. Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237(4821), 14451452. DOI: 10.1126/science.3629249
  55. Kim, Y. G. (2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 459481. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.107
  56. King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580602. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90027-H
  57. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 126. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  58. Langlois, V. J., & Arnold, J. E. (2020). Print exposure explains individual differences in using syntactic but not semantic cues for pronoun comprehension. Cognition, 197, 104155. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104155
  59. Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385408. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amu054
  60. Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801842. DOI: 10.1017/S027226311500042X
  61. Li, S. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research: A comprehensive and critical review. Language Aptitude, 7896. DOI: 10.4324/9781315122021-5
  62. Lidz, J., & Williams, A. (2009). Constructions on holiday. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 177189. DOI: 10.1515/COGL.2009.011
  63. Llompart, M., & Dąbrowska, E. (2020). Explicit but Not Implicit Memory Predicts Ultimate Attainment in the Native Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2571. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569586
  64. Llompart, M., & Dąbrowska, E. (2023) ‘Foreign’ language aptitude predicts individual differences in native grammatical proficiency. Linguistics, 61(5), 11651193. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2022-0009
  65. Lum, J., & Kidd, E. (2012). An examination into the associations between multiple memory systems, past tense and vocabulary in typically developing 5-year old children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.
  66. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 3554. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35
  67. MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 581611). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50016-X
  68. McLaughlin, B. (1990). The relationship between first and second languages: Language proficiency and language aptitude. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.014
  69. Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00626.x
  70. Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671717. DOI: 10.1080/02643299408251989
  71. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267. DOI: 10.1037/a0021890
  72. Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-Examining the Age Factor. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/sibil.39
  73. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Metalinguistic Awareness and Literacy Acquisition in Different Languages. Centre for the Study of Reading.
  74. Ng, S., Payne, B. R., Liu, X., Anderson, C. J., Federmeier, K. D., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2020). Execution of lexical and conceptual processes in sentence comprehension among adult readers as a function of literacy skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(4), 338355. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2019.1671849
  75. Ng, S., Payne, B. R., Stine-Morrow, E. A., & Federmeier, K. D. (2018). How struggling adult readers use contextual information when comprehending speech: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 125, 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.013
  76. Nippold, M. A. (2016). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults. ERIC.
  77. Nowak, M. A., Komarova, N. L., & Niyogi, P. (2001). Evolution of Universal Grammar. Science, 291, 114118. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5501.114
  78. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children’s awareness of morphology. Reading and Writing, 19, 767787. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-006-9025-y
  79. O’Donnell, R. C. (1974). Syntactic differences between speech and writing. American Speech, 49(1/2), 102110. DOI: 10.2307/3087922
  80. Oliveira, C. M., Henderson, L., & Hayiou-Thomas, M. E. (2022). Limited Evidence Of An Association Between Language, Literacy And Procedural Learning In Typical And Atypical Development: A Meta-Analysis. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/ndtg6
  81. Parsons, S. (2021). splithalf; robust estimates of split half reliability. DOI: 10.21105/joss.03041
  82. Payne, B. R., Federmeier, K. D., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2020). Literacy skill and intra-individual variability in eye-fixation durations during reading: Evidence from a diverse community-based adult sample. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 18411861. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820935457
  83. Prela, L., Dąbrowska, E., & Llompart, M. (2022). Aptitude and experience in L1 and L2 as predictors of grammatical proficiency in adult English-Greek bilingualsultimate attainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062821. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062821
  84. Pronk, T. (2021). splithalfr: Estimates split-half reliabilities for scoring algorithms of cognitive tasks and questionnaires (Version 2.2.2). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7777894
  85. Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.3.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  86. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
  87. Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome, E. D. Jr., & Beck, L. H. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20(5), 343350. DOI: 10.1037/h0043220
  88. Sasaki, M. (1996). Second Language Proficiency, Foreign Language Aptitude, and Intelligence. Peter Lang.
  89. Scholes, R. J., Tanis, D. C., & Turner, A. (1976). Syntactic and strategic aspects of the comprehension of indirect and direct object constructions by children. Language and Speech, 19(3), 212223. DOI: 10.1177/002383097601900302
  90. Scholes, R. J., & Willis, B. J. (1987). Age and education in oral language skills. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3(3–4), 239253. DOI: 10.1080/87565648709540379
  91. Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 68. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068
  92. Searchinger, G. (Director). (1994). The Human Language, Part 2: Playing the Language Game. New York: Equinox Films.
  93. Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 15991603. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1599
  94. Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., & Frost, R. (2017). Measuring individual differences in statistical learning: Current pitfalls and possible solutions. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 418432. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0719-z
  95. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, 2, 6994. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.2.06ske
  96. Smith, N. (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge University Press.
  97. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360407. DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
  98. Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E. (2010). More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 120, 20802094. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004
  99. Sullivan, A., & Brown, M. (2015). Vocabulary from adolescence to middle age. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 6(2), 173189. DOI: 10.14301/llcs.v6i2.310
  100. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Child Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.
  101. Trudgill, P. (1992). Dialect typology and social structure. In E. H. Jahr (Ed.), Language Contact: Theoretical and Empirical Studies (pp. 195211). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110851847.195
  102. Ullman, M. T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically-motivated theory of first and second language. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 135158). Routledge.
  103. Ullman, M. T. (2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok & S. Small (Eds.), The Neurobiology of Language (pp. 953968). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6
  104. van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 167. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03
  105. von der Malsburg, T. (2015). Py-Span-Task: A software for testing working memory span. Zenodo. 10.
  106. Wassenberg, R., Hurks, P. P., Hendriksen, J. G., Feron, F. J., Meijs, C. J., Vles, J. S., & Jolles, J. (2008). Age-related improvement in complex language comprehension: Results of a cross-sectional study with 361 children aged 5 to 15. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(4), 435448. DOI: 10.1080/13803390701523091
  107. Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 250271. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
  108. Wesche, M., Edwards, H., & Wells, W. (1982). Foreign language aptitude and intelligence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(2), 127140. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400006664
  109. West, G., Vadillo, M. A., Shanks, D. R., & Hulme, C. (2017). The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: We see some problems. Developmental Science. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12552
  110. Wright, R., Winckel, E., & Dąbrowska, E. (in prep.) Author Recognition Test: Young and Young Adult versions.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.333 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 21, 2022
|
Accepted on: Nov 6, 2023
|
Published on: Jan 9, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Elodie Winckel, Ewa Dąbrowska, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.