References
- 1Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 31(4), 578–602. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200738
- 2Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- 3Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1996). The CELEX lexical database (cd-rom).
- 4Baroni, M., & Lenci, A. (2010). Distributional Memory: A General Framework for Corpus-Based Semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4), 673–721. DOI: 10.1162/COLI_A_00016
- 5Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
- 6Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
- 7Bedny, M., Koster-Hale, J., Elli, G., Yazzolino, L., & Saxe, R. (2019). There’s more to “sparkle” than meets the eye: Knowledge of vision and light verbs among congenitally blind and sighted individuals. Cognition, 189, 105–115. DOI: 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2019.03.017
- 8Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 905–917. DOI: 10.1162/0898929054021102
- 9Bottini, R., Morucci, P., D’Urso, A., Collignon, O., & Crepaldi, D. (2021). The concreteness advantage in lexical decision does not depend on perceptual simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001090
- 10Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 208–216. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197718
- 11Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2010). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 545–559. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
- 12Campbell, E. E., & Bergelson, E. (2022). Making sense of sensory language: Acquisition of sensory knowledge by individuals with congenital sensory impairments. Neuropsychologia, 174,
108320 . DOI: 10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2022.108320 - 13Cherry, C. (1957). On Human Communication: A Review. A Survey and a criticism. Massachusetts: the Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- 14Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125(3), 452–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
- 15Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014). I see/hear what you mean: Semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2),
527 . DOI: 10.1037/a0034626 - 16de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational Aspects of Word Imageability and Word Frequency as Assessed Through Word Association. Article in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 15(5), 824–845. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.824
- 17Fliessbach, K., Weis, S., Klaver, P., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2006). The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory. NeuroImage. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.007
- 18Gentner, D., & Asmuth, J. (2017). Metaphoric extension, relational categories, and abstraction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1298–1307. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1410560
- 19Günther, F., Marelli, M., Tureski, S., & Petilli, M. (2022). ViSpa (Vision Spaces): A computer-vision-based representation system for individual images and concept prototypes, with large-scale evaluation. Psychological Review. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000392
- 20Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., Vergallito, A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Images of the unseen: Extrapolating visual representations for abstract and concrete words in a data-driven computational model. Psychological Research. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01429-7
- 21Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-Space Models of Semantic Representation From a Cognitive Perspective: A Discussion of Common Misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1006–1033. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619861372
- 22Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2016). The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1744–1756. DOI: 10.3758/S13423-016-1053-2
- 23Johns, B. T., & Jones, M. N. (2012). Perceptual inference through global lexical similarity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 103–120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01176.x
- 24Jones, M. N., Hills, T. T., & Todd, P. M. (2015). Hidden processes in structural representations: A reply to Abbott, Austerweil, and Griffiths (2015). DOI: 10.1037/a0039248
- 25Kerr, N. H., & Johnson, T. H. (1991). Word norms for blind and sighted subjects: Familiarity, concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, imagery modality, and word associations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1991 23:4, 23(4), 461–485. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209988
- 26Kim, J. S., Elli, G. V., & Bedny, M. (2019). Knowledge of animal appearance among sighted and blind adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 166(23), 11213–11222. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900952116
- 27Kroll, J. F., & Merves, J. S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(1), 92. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.92
- 28Lewis, M., Zettersten, M., & Lupyan, G. (2019). Distributional semantics as a source of visual knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 19237–19238. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910148116
- 29Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273–302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
- 30Lupyan, G., & Lewis, M. (2017). From words-as-mappings to words-as-cues: the role of language in semantic knowledge. 34(10), 1319–1337. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1404114
- 31Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1271–1291. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
- 32Marmor, G. S. (1978). Age at onset of blindness and the development of the semantics of color names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25(2), 267–278. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(78)90082-6
- 33Matheson, H. E., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). Embodiment and grounding in cognitive neuroscience. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 1–27. DOI: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn310
- 34Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. DOI: 10.1016/J.CORTEX.2010.11.002
- 35Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1301.3781.
- 36Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of thought and of the science of symbolism.
- 37Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001
- 38Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). CONCRETENESS, IMAGERY, AND MEANINGFULNESS VALUES FOR 925 NOUNS 1. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76(1). DOI: 10.1037/h0025327
- 39Petilli, M. A., Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2022). The Flickr Visual Frequency norms: what 17 years of images tagged online tell us about lexical processing. DOI: 10.31234/OSF.IO/H4Q86
- 40Petilli, M. A., Günther, F., Vergallito, A., Ciapparelli, M., & Marelli, M. (2021). Data-driven computational models reveal perceptual simulation in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 117,
104194 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104194 - 41R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
https://www.r-project.org/ - 42Reilly, J., & Kean, J. (2007). Formal distinctiveness of high-and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive science, 31(1), 157–168. DOI: 10.1080/03640210709336988
- 43Saysani, A., Corballis, M. C., & Corballis, P. M. (2021). Seeing colour through language: Colour knowledge in the blind and sighted. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 63–71. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1866726
- 44Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
- 45Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 114–126. DOI: 10.2307/748013
- 46Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (2017). Representation of Colors in the Blind, Color-Blind, and Normally Sighted. Psychological Science, 3(2), 97–104. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9280.1992.TB00006.X
- 47Speed, L. J., & Brybaert, M. (2022). Dutch sensory modality norms. Behavior Research Methods, 54(3), 1306–1318. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9
- 48Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 49van Paridon, J., Liu, Q., & Lupyan, G. (2021). How do blind people know that blue is cold? Distributional semantics encode color-adjective associations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43(43). DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vyxpq
- 50Vergallito, A., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks. Behavior Research Methods. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8
- 51Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 219–247. DOI: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.011
- 52Wingfield, C., & Connell, L. (2022). Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs. Behavior Research Methods, 1, 1–17. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7
- 53Yee, E. (2019). Abstraction and concepts: when, how, where, what and why? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1257–1265. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1660797