References
- 1Bogacz, R., Wagenmakers, E. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences, 33, 10–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002
- 2Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–336. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6
- 3Burle, B., Spieser, L., Servant, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2014). Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1003–1010. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0561-6
- 4Burle, B., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 619-641. DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000121
- 5Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484–1525. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
- 6Cespón, J., Hommel, B., Korsch, M., & Galashan, D. (2020). The neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current research. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 1133–1172. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00836-y
- 7Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
- 8De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731750. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
- 9Ellinghaus, R., Karlbauer, M., Bausenhart, K. M., & Ulrich, R. (2018). On the time-course of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 82, 734–743. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0860-z
- 10Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143149. DOI: 10.3758/BF03203267
- 11Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101–118. DOI: 10.1080/13506289508401726
- 12Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381391. DOI: 10.1037/h0055392
- 13Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 150. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00150
- 14Heuer, H., Seegelke, C., & Wühr, P. (2023). Staggered onsets of processing relevant and irrelevant stimulus features produce different dynamics of congruency effects. Journal of Cognition, 6, 8. DOI: 10.5334/joc.252
- 15Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419656
- 16Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403. DOI: 10.1037/h0026739
- 17Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130–135. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419699
- 18Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility. – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- 19Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267–284. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206750
- 20Lu, C.-W., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210959
- 21Mackenzie, I. G., Mittelstädt, V., Ulrich, R., & Leuthold, H. (2022). The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48, 1099–1115. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001032
- 22MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 91–139. DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3
- 23Mittelstädt, V., & Miller, J. (2020). Beyond mean reaction times: combining distributional analyses with processing stage manipulations in the Simon task. Cognitive Psychology, 119, 101–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101275
- 24Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J., Leuthold, H., Mackenzie, I. G., & Ulrich, R. (2022). The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 837–854. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02003-x
- 25Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
- 26Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00061
- 27Nobre, A. C., & Van Ede, F. (2018). Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 34–48. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2017.141
- 28Pachella, R. G. (1974).
The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research . In: R. B. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. DOI: 10.4324/9781003176688-2 - 29Pew, R. W. (1969).
The speed-accuracy operating characteristic . In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 16–26). Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90035-3 - 30Proctor, R. W., Miles, J. D., & Baroni, G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 242–266. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0053-5
- 31Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002).
Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses . In: B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 494–519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. - 32Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143–153. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90054-6
- 33Simon, J. R. (1969). Reaction toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176. DOI: 10.1037/h0027448
- 34Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005
- 35Van den Wildenberg, W. P., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: a review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 222. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222
- 36Van Wouwe, N. C., Van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Claassen, D. O., Kanoff, K., Bashore, T. R., & Wylie, S. A. (2014). Speed pressure in conflict situations impedes inhibitory action control in Parkinson’s disease. Biological Psychology, 101, 44–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.002
- 37Verdonck, S., Loossens, T., & Philiastides, M. G. (2021). The Leaky Integrating Threshold and its impact on evidence accumulation models of choice response time (RT). Psychological Review, 128, 203–221. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000258
- 38Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1206–1220. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196893
- 39Wagenmakers, E. J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830–841. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830
- 40Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9
- 41Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453
- 42Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2007). Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 71, 401–410. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0027-1
- 43Wühr, P., Biebl, R., Umiltà, C., & Müsseler, J. (2009). Perceptual and attentional factors in encoding irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 73, 350–363. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0160-8
- 44Wühr, P., & Waszak, F. (2003). Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 983–994. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196450
- 45Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1543–1551. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1543