References
- Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108
- Awh, E., Belopolsky, A., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
- Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496. DOI: 10.3758/BF03205306
- Barbor, T. F. (1994). De gustibus non est disputandum: lumpers, splitters and the disconfirmation dilemma. Addiction, 89, 1059–1061. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb02777.x
- Benoni, H. (2018). Top-down prioritization of salient items may produce the so-called stimulus-driven capture. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 218. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00218
- Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
- Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 132–138. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193824
- Mysore, S., & Knudsen, E. I. (2013). A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection. Nature Neuroscience, 16(4), 473–478. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3352
- Theeuwes, J. (2018). Visual selection: usually fast and automatic; seldom slow and volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 29. DOI: 10.5334/joc.13