Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Language Experience Predicts Eye Movements During Online Auditory Comprehension Cover

Language Experience Predicts Eye Movements During Online Auditory Comprehension

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 5068. DOI: 10.1037/a0014411
  2. Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2011). The rhymes that the reader perused confused the meaning: Phonological effects during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 193207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.006
  3. Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278289. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
  4. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419439. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
  5. Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247264. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
  6. Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tilly, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  7. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 148. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  8. Blair, J. R., & Spreen, O. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: a revision of the National Adult Reading Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3(2), 129136. DOI: 10.1080/13854048908403285
  9. Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417436. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005
  10. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision, 10, 433436. DOI: 10.1163/156856897X00357
  11. Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 128. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
  12. Chun, M. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 14071409. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.029
  13. Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769786. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196772
  14. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 6(1), 84107. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X
  15. Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. [Doctoral dissertation, McGill University]. eScholarship @ McGill. https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/05741s554
  16. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671684. DOI: 10.1037/h0043943
  17. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450466. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
  18. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/Manual_for_Kit_of_Factor-Referenced_Cognitive_Tests.pdf
  19. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143149. DOI: 10.3758/BF03203267
  20. Eriksen, C. W. (2007). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2(2–3), 101118. DOI: 10.1080/13506289508401726
  21. Farris-Trimble, A., & McMurray, B. (2013). Test-retest reliability of eye tracking in the visual world paradigm for the study of real-time spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(4), 132845. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0145)
  22. Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 98116. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.98
  23. Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science, 9(3), 228231. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00044
  24. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101135. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
  25. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4, 294298. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00567.x
  26. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). The Structure-Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. K. Britton, & A. C. Graesser, (Eds.), Models of text understanding (pp. 289311). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  27. Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium (pp. 94126). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  28. Gupta, P. (2003). Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 12131236. DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000071
  29. Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 11661186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
  30. Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 217. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217
  31. Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2017). Predictors of verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in the visual world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(9), 13521374. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000388
  32. Huettig, F., Singh, N., & Mishra, R. K. (2011). Language-mediated visual orienting behavior in low and high literates. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 285. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00285
  33. Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151171. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
  34. Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 8093. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459
  35. Hussey, E. K., & Novick, J. M. (2012). The benefits of executive control training and the implications for language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 158. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00158
  36. James, A. N., Fraundorf, S. H., Lee, E. K., & Watson, D. G. (2018). Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions? Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 155181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006
  37. Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 647670. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
  38. Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133156. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
  39. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169183. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169
  40. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(4), 637671. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196323
  41. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47
  42. Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018). The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 178206. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4
  43. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 126. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  44. Lustig, C., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 199207. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.199
  45. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comments on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 3554. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35
  46. Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake—But only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843. DOI: 10.1037/a0029284
  47. Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2014). Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: A study of children developing proficiency in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 264279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.004
  48. Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
  49. Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved 2012, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
  50. Mishra, R., Singh, N., Pandey, A., & Huettig, F. (2012). Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye movements are modulated by reading ability: Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(1), 3, 110. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.5.1.3
  51. Nelson, H. E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
  52. Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263281. DOI: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
  53. Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca’s area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 906924. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x
  54. Oberauer, K. (2022). The importance of random slopes in mixed models for Bayesian hypothesis testing. Psychological Science, 33(4), 648665. DOI: 10.1177/09567976211046884
  55. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1978). Modes of perceiving and processing information. Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & E. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information (pp. 137157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  56. Pronk, T., Molenaar, D., Wiers, R. W., & Murre, J. (2022). Methods to split cognitive task data for estimating split-half reliability: A comprehensive review and systematic assessment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(1), 4454. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01948-3
  57. Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales (pp. 223237). Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
  58. Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2015). Verbal and nonverbal predictors of language-mediated anticipatory eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 720730. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0873-x
  59. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
  60. Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763
  61. Salverda, A. P., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 172180. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.010
  62. Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71(2), 109147. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6
  63. Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302319. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013
  64. Smith, A. C., Monaghan, P., & Huettig, F. (2014). Literacy effects on language and vision: Emergent effects from an amodal shared resource (ASR) computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 75, 2854. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.07.002
  65. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402433. DOI: 10.2307/747605
  66. Stine, E. A. L., & Hindman, J. (1994). Age differences in reading time allocation for propositionally dense sentences. Aging and Cognition, 1, 216. DOI: 10.1080/09289919408251446
  67. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643662. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
  68. Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 64. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64
  69. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 16321634. DOI: 10.1126/science.7777863
  70. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498505. DOI: 10.3758/BF03192720
  71. Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1302. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1302
  72. Uttl, B. (2002). North American Adult Reading Test: Age norms, reliability, and validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 11231137. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.24.8.1123.8375
  73. Viviani, P. (1990). Eye movements in visual search: Cognitive, perceptual, and motor control aspects. E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (Series: Reviews of Oculomotor Research, Volume 4). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
  74. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing: CTOPP. Pro-Ed.
  75. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test. (2004). Amsterdam. 3rd ed., Dutch version. The Netherlands: Harcourt Test.
  76. Westfall, J., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PloS one, 11(3), e0152719. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719
  77. Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2002). Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News, 2(3), 710. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.285 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jun 3, 2023
|
Published on: Jun 28, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Ariel N. James, Colleen J. Minnihan, Duane G. Watson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.