Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Associative Learning from Verbal Action-Effect Instructions: A Replication and Investigation of Underlying Mechanisms Cover

Associative Learning from Verbal Action-Effect Instructions: A Replication and Investigation of Underlying Mechanisms

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci., 22(4), 577660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
  2. Damanskyy, Y., Martiny-Huenger, T., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2022). Unintentional response priming from verbal action–effect instructions. Psychological Research. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01664-0
  3. Eder, A., & Dignath, D.. (2017). Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control. An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action, 81(2), 355365. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0745-6
  4. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect Anticipation and Action Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229240. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229
  5. Hommel, B. (2004, April 1). Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 7490. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0146-5
  6. James, W., & Hutchins, R. M. (1952). The principles of psychology (Vol. 53). Encyclopædia Britannica.
  7. Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Culhane, S. E. (1995, January). Data Analysis: Continuing Issues in the Everyday Analysis of Psychological Data. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 433465. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.002245
  8. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive Basis for Stimulus-Response Compatibility-A Model and Taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
  9. Langsrud, Ø. (2003). ANOVA for unbalanced data: Use type II instead of type III sums of squares. Statistics and Computing, 13(2), 163167. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023260610025
  10. Lawrence Michael, A. (2016). ez: Easy Analysis and Visualization of Factorial Experiments. R package version 4.4-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
  11. Liefooghe, B. & De Houwer, J. (2018). Automatic effects of instructions do not require the intention to execute these instructions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 108121. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1365871
  12. Martiny-Huenger, T., Martiny, S., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Action control by if-then planning: Explicating the mechanisms of strategic automaticity in regard to objective and subjective agency. B. Eitam & P. Haggard (Hrsg.), The sense of agency. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190267278.003.0003
  13. Martiny-Huenger, T., Martiny, S. E., Parks-Stamm, E. J., Pfeiffer, E., Gollwitzer, P. M., Gauthier, I., & Cowan, N. (2017). From Conscious Thought to Automatic Action: A Simulation Account of Action Planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(10), 15131525. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000344
  14. Mekawi, Y., & Bresin, K. (2015). Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 120130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.002
  15. Pavlovia. (2021). Pavlovia. https://pavlovia.org
  16. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019, February). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  17. Pfister, R., Pfeuffer, C. U., & Kunde, W. (2014). Perceiving by proxy: Effect-based action control with unperceivable effects. Cognition, 132(3), 251261. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.012
  18. Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), 62(10), 19041914. DOI: 10.1080/17470210902853530
  19. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943974. DOI: 10.1037/a0020541
  20. Sun, D., Custers, R., Marien, H., & Aarts, H. (2020). Ideomotor Action: Evidence for Automaticity in Learning, but Not Execution. Front Psychol, 11, 185185. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00185
  21. Theeuwes, M., De Houwer, J., Eder, A., & Liefooghe, B. (2015). Congruency effects on the basis of instructed response-effect contingencies. Acta Psychol (Amst), 158, 4350. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.002
  22. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
  23. Waszak, F., Cardoso-Leite, P., & Hughes, G. (2012). Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 36(2), 943959. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004
  24. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Res, 44(12), 14111426. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.284 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2022
Accepted on: May 31, 2023
Published on: Jun 22, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Yevhen Damanskyy, Torsten Martiny-Huenger, Elizabeth J. Parks-Stamm, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.