Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Listening to Contemporary Art Music: A Morphodynamic Model of Cognition Cover

Listening to Contemporary Art Music: A Morphodynamic Model of Cognition

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Hevenor, S., Graham, S. & Grady, C. L. (2001). “What” and “Where” in the Human Auditory System. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(21), 12301. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.211209098
  2. Bergson, H. (1998). Durée et Simultanéité a Propos de la Théorie D’Einstein. Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1922).
  3. Bergson, H. (2008). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). Cosimo Classics. (Original work published 1910).
  4. Bonnet, F. J. (2012). Les mots et les sons: Un archipel sonore. Éditions de l’éclat.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit.
  6. Brattico, E., Bogert, B., & Jacobsen, T. (2013). Toward a neural chronometry for the aesthetic experience of music. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 206. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00206
  7. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001
  8. Brower, C. (1997). Pathway, Blockage, and Containment in Density 21.5. Theory and Practice, 22, 3554.
  9. Brower, C. (2000). A Cognitive Theory Of Musical Meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 44, 323379. DOI: 10.2307/3090681
  10. Caramiaux, B., Bevilacqua, F., Bianco, T., Schnell, N., Houix, O., & Susini, P. (2014). The Role of Sound Source Perception in Gestural Sound Description. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(1), 119. DOI: 10.1145/2536811
  11. Clarke, E. (2005). Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford University Press.
  12. Cox, A. (2016). Music and Embodied Cognition. Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thiking. Indiana University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt200610s
  13. Davies, S. (1994). Musical Meaning and Expression. Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/9781501733987
  14. Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2016). Modeling perceptions of valence in diverse music: Roles of acoustical features, agency, and individual variation. Music Perception, 34, 104117. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2016.34.1.104
  15. Deil, J., Markert, N., Normand, P., Kammen, P., Küssner, M. B., & Taruffi, L. (2022). Mind-wandering during contemporary live music: An exploratory study. Musicae Scientiae. DOI: 10.1177/10298649221103210
  16. Delalande, F. (2013). Analyser La Musique, Pourquoi, Comment? INA-GRM.
  17. DeLanda, M. (2022). Materialist Phenomenology. A philosophy of Perception. Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781350263987
  18. Deliège, I. (1989). Approche perceptive de formes musicales contemporaines. S. McAdams & I. Deliège (Eds.), La musique et le science cognitives (pp. 305326). P. Mardaga.
  19. Demers, J. (2010). Listening Through Noise: The Aesthetics of Experimental Electronic Music. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387650.001.0001
  20. Deutsch, D. (1986). A musical paradox. Music Perception, 3(3), 275280. DOI: 10.2307/40285337
  21. Dewey, J. (1987). Art as Experience. Vol. 10 of The Later Works, 1925–1953. Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1934).
  22. Dowling, W. J. (2010). Music perception. In Oxford Handbook of Auditory Science: Hearing. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233557.013.0010
  23. Emmerson, S., & Landy, L. (Eds.) (2016). Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316339633
  24. Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Neves, C. F. H. (2010). Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space-time. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(2), 195249. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.001
  25. Frey, A., Daquet, A., Poitrenaud, S., Tijus, C., Fremiot, M., Formosa, M., Prod’homme, L., Mandelbrojt, J., Timsit-Berthier, M., Bootz, P., Hautbois, X., & Besson, M. (2009). Pertinence cognitive des unités sémiotiques temporelles. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 415440. DOI: 10.1177/102986490901300209
  26. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  27. Giomi, F., & Ligabue, M. (1998). Evangelisti’s Composition Incontri di Fasce Sonore at W.D.R.: Aesthesic-Cognitive Analysis in Theory and Practice. Journal of New Music Research, 27(1–2), 120145. DOI: 10.1080/09298219808570741
  28. Giordano, B. L., & McAdams, S. (2010). Sound Source Mechanics and Musical Timbre Perception: Evidence From Previous Studies. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 155168. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2010.28.2.155
  29. Glover, R., Gottschalk, J., & Harrison, B. (2018). Being Time. Case Studies in Musical Temporality. Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781501396267
  30. Godøy, R. I. (1997). Knowledge in Music Theory by Shapes of Musical Objects and Sound-Producing Actions. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, Gestalt, and Computing. Studies in Cognitive and Systematic Musicology (Springer-Verlag, pp. 89102). DOI: 10.1007/BFb0034109
  31. Grebosz-Haring, K., & Weichbold, M. (2020). Contemporary art music and its audiences: Age, gender, and social class profile. Musicae Scientiae, 24(1), 6077. DOI: 10.1177/1029864918774082
  32. Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), 12701277. DOI: 10.1121/1.381428
  33. Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 887892. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1538
  34. Grisey, G. (1987). Tempus ex machina: A composer’s reflections on musical time. Contemporary Music Review, 2(1), 239275. DOI: 10.1080/07494468708567060
  35. Gross, J., & Pitts, S. (2016). Audiences for the contemporary arts: Exploring varieties of participation across art forms in Birmingham. Participations, 13(1), 423.
  36. Haas, G. F. (2000). In vain. UE31835. Universal Edition.
  37. Hampe, B., & Grady, J. (2008). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. De Gruyter.
  38. Hargreaves, D., & North, A. C. (2010). Experimental aesthetics and liking for music. P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 583605). Oxford University Press.
  39. Hasegawa, R. (2015). Clashing Harmonic Systems in Haas’s Blumenstück and in vain. Music Theory Spectrum, 37(2), 204223. DOI: 10.1093/mts/mtv014
  40. Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6575.001.0001
  41. Imberty, M. (2005). La musique creuse le temps. De Wagner à Boulez: Musique, psychologie, psychanalyse. L’Harmattan.
  42. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
  43. Johnson, M. (2008). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. University of Chicago Press.
  44. Juslin, P. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10(3), 235266. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008
  45. Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2013). Music and Emotion. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music (Third Edition), pp. 583645). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00015-8
  46. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception. Praeger.
  47. Kendall, G. S. (2014). The Feeling Blend: Feeling and emotion in electroacoustic art. Organised Sound, 19, 192202. DOI: 10.1017/S1355771814000132
  48. Kivy, P. (1991). Music Alone: Philosophical Reflections on the Purely Musical Experience. Cornell University Press.
  49. Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 578584. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.001
  50. Koffka, K. (1999). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Routledge. (Original work published 1935).
  51. Kosslyn, S. M., Shephard, J. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2007). Spatial Processing during Mental Imagery: A Neurofunctional Theory. F. Mast & L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery and Perception (pp. 115). Springer US. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_1
  52. Kozak, M. (2020). Enacting Musical Time. The Bodily Experience of New Music. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190080204.001.0001
  53. Kramer, J. D. (1988). The time of music: New meanings, new temporalities, new listening strategies. Schirmer/Mosel Verlag GmbH.
  54. Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind (Vol. 1). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1003. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01003
  55. Küssner, M. B. (2018). Shape, drawing and gesture: Empirical studies of cross-modality. D. Leech-Wilkinson & H. M. Prior (Eds.), Music and Shape (pp. 3356). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199351411.003.0004
  56. Laeng, B. (2013). Representation of Spatial Relations. In K. N. Ochsner & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, Volume 1: Core Topics (p. 0). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988693.013.0003
  57. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
  58. Landy, L. (2007). Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7472.001.0001
  59. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I. Stanford University Press.
  60. Larson, S. (2012). Musical Forces. Motion, Metaphor, and Meaning in Music. Indiana University Press.
  61. Larson, S., & VanHandel, L. (2005). Measuring Musical Forces. Music Perception, 23(2), 119136. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2005.23.2.119
  62. Leman, M. (2008). Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7476.001.0001
  63. Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press.
  64. Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press.
  65. López, F. (2004). Profound Listening and Environmental Sound Matter. C. Cox & D. Warner (Eds.), Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music (pp. 8287). Bloomsbury.
  66. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. MIT Press.
  67. Massoud, M. R. (2017). An Analysis of Georg Friedrich Haas’s in vain. Northwestern University.
  68. Mencke, I., Omigie, D., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., & Brattico, E. (2019). Atonal Music: Can Uncertainty Lead to Pleasure? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 979. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00979
  69. Mencke, I., Seibert, C., Brattico, E., & Wald-Fuhrmann, M. (2022). Comparing the aesthetic experience of classic–romantic and contemporary classical music: An interview study. Psychology of Music, 1. DOI: 10.1177/03057356221091312
  70. Menger, P.-M. (2014). The Economics of Creativity. Art and Achievement under Uncertainty. Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674726451
  71. Menin, D., & Schiavio, A. (2012). Rethinking Musical Affordances. AVANT, III(2), 202215.
  72. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976). Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard. (Original work published 1945). DOI: 10.14375/NP.9782070293377
  73. Ockelford, A., & Sergeant, D. (2012). Musical expectancy in atonal contexts: Musicians’ perception of “antistructure”. Psychology of Music, 41(2), 139174. DOI: 10.1177/0305735612442582
  74. Oliveros, P. (2005). Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. Iuniverse.
  75. Petitot, J. (1985). Morphogenèse du Sens I. Presses Universitaires de France.
  76. Petitot, J. (2011). Cognitive Morphodynamics. Dynamical Morphological Models of Constituency in Perception and Syntax. Peter Lang AG.
  77. Reybrouck, M. (2012). Musical Sense-Making and the Concept of Affordance: An Ecosemiotic and Experiential Approach. Biosemiotics, 5(3), 391409. DOI: 10.1007/s12304-012-9144-6
  78. Reybrouck, M. (2013). Musical universals and the axiom of psychobiological equivalence. J.-L. Leroy (Ed.), Topicality of Musical Universals/Actualité des Universaux musicaux (pp. 3144). Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
  79. Reybrouck, M. (2020). Musical Sense-Making: Enaction, Experience, and Computation. Taylor & Francis.
  80. Ridley, A. (2004). The Philosophy of Music: Theme and Variations. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781474472036
  81. Roy, S. (2003). L’Analyse des Musiques Électroacoustiques: Modèles et Propositions. L’Harmattan.
  82. Ruggles, D. R., Tausend, A. N., Shamma, S. A., & Oxenham, A. J. (2018). Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(4), 24242433. DOI: 10.1121/1.5065392
  83. Santarcangelo, V., & Wanke, R. (2020). The Early Stage of Perception of Contemporary Art Music: A matter of time. Organised Sound, 25(2), 130141. DOI: 10.1017/S1355771820000047
  84. Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des objets musicaux. Editions Du Seuil.
  85. Scruton, R. (1997). The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford University Press.
  86. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins Pub. DOI: 10.1075/aicr.14
  87. Smalley, D. (1997). Spectromorphology: Explaining sound-shapes. Organised Sound, 2(2), 107126. DOI: 10.1017/S1355771897009059
  88. Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 174. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00052432
  89. Snyder, B. (2001). Music and Memory. MIT Press.
  90. Solomos, M. (2023). Exploring the Ecologies of Music and Sound: Environmental, Mental and Social Ecologies in Music, Sound Art and Artivisms. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781003254454
  91. Solomos, M. (2019). From Music to Sound: The Emergence of Sound in 20th- and 21st-Century Music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  92. Tenney, J. (1988). Meta+Hodos: A phenomenology of 20th-century musical materials and an approach to the study of form and META Meta+Hodos. Frog Peak Music. DOI: 10.2307/1578336
  93. Thom, R. (1983). Paraboles et catastrophes. Flammarion.
  94. Vainio, M., & Väisänen, I. (2004). Pan Sonic—Kesto 234.48:4: Vol. BFFP 180BX-CD [CD]. Blast First.
  95. Van der Schyff, D., Schiavio, A., & Elliott, D. J. (2022). Musical Bodies, Musical Minds. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12117.001.0001
  96. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
  97. Voegelin, S. (2014). Sonic Possible Worlds. Hearing the Continuum of Sound. Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.1162/LMJ_a_00168
  98. Wanke, R. (2015). A Cross-genre Study of the (Ec)Static Perspective of Today’s Music. Organised Sound, 20(3), 331339. DOI: 10.1017/S1355771815000266
  99. Wanke, R. (2017). The Emergence of an Ecstatic-materialist Perspective as a Cross-genre Tendency in Experimental Music. Organised Sound, 22(3), 428436. DOI: 10.1017/S1355771817000437
  100. Wanke, R. (2019). A unified approach to perceiving sound in current experimental music genres. Filigrane. Musique, Esthétique, Sciences, Société. 23. https://revues.mshparisnord.fr/filigrane/index.php?id=879
  101. Wanke, R. (2021). Sound in the Ecstatic-Materialist Perspective on Experimental Music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  102. Wanke, R. (2022). Listening Survey – figshare. 10.6084/m9.figshare.21590658.v3, 10.6084/m9.figshare.21590802.v1, 10.6084/m9.figshare.21590826.v1
  103. Wanke, R., & Santarcangelo, V. (2021). Memory as the Aspatial Domain for the Perception of Certain Genres of Contemporary Art Music. Music & Science, 4, 118. DOI: 10.1177/2059204321997658
  104. Windsor, L. W., & de Bézenac, C. (2012). Music and affordances. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 102120. DOI: 10.1177/1029864911435734
  105. Zuckerkandl, V. (1969). Sound and Symbol: Music and the External World. Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.280 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 21, 2022
|
Accepted on: Apr 20, 2023
|
Published on: Jul 4, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Riccardo D. Wanke, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.