Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)

Heinrich R. Liesefeld; Hermann J. Müller

doi:10.5334/joc.279

Abstract

In a healthy scientific community, theories influence each other and promising ideas are embraced by competing theoretical camps. We are therefore pleased that Theeuwes (2023) now agrees with core points of our theoretical position (Liesefeld et al., 2021; Liesefeld & Müller, 2020), most notably, the central role target salience plays for interference by salient distractors and the conditions that facilitate clump scanning. The present commentary traces the development of Theeuwes’ theorizing and carves out remaining discrepancies, most notably the conjecture of two qualitatively distinct search modes. Such a dichotomy is embraced by us, but decidedly rejected by Theeuwes. Accordingly, we selectively review some evidence in favor of search modes that appear crucial to the current debate.

References

Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 88–101. DOI: 10.3758/BF03205479
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2015). Direct evidence for active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant sensory inputs. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1740–1750. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615597913
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humphreys, G. W., & Muller, H. J. (1993). SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 43–110. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 132–138. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193824
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liesefeld, H. R., Lamy, D., Gaspelin, N., Geng, J., Kerzel, D., Schall, J., … Wolfe, J. (2023, March 9). Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/4b2gk
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., & Müller, H. J. (2021). Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets. Visual Cognition, 29(9), 600–603. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1925798
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liesefeld, H. R., & Müller, H. J. (2019). Distractor handling via dimension weighting. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 160–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liesefeld, H. R., & Müller, H. J. (2020). A theoretical attempt to revive the serial/parallel-search dichotomy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(1), 228–245. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01819-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Müller, H. J., Liesefeld, H. R., Moran, R., & Usher, M. (2017). Parallel attentive processing and pre-attentive guidance. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e149. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000194
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(4), 355–375. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206697
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(2), 184–193. DOI: 10.3758/BF03212219
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 65–70. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206462
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Theeuwes, J. (2021). Response to commentaries to Luck et al. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(9), 637–643. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1978672
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Theeuwes, J. (2023). The attentional capture debate: When can we avoid salient distractors and when not? Journal of Cognition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1051–1057. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000796
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wienrich, C., & Janczyk, M. (2011). Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: A failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), Article 7. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0183-x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolfe, J. M. (2021). Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 1060–1092. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zehetleitner, M., Goschy, H., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Top-down control of attention: It’s gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 941–957. DOI: 10.1037/a0027629
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhaoping, L. (2008). Attention capture by eye of origin singletons even without awareness—A hallmark of a bottom-up saliency map in the primary visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(5), 1. DOI: 10.1167/8.5.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)

Abstract

Paradigm

My account