References
- Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
- Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(5), 485–496. DOI: 10.3758/BF03205306
- Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2013). Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations. Psychological Science, 24(5), 634–647. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612458528
- Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
- Irons, J., Folk, C., & Remington, R. (2011). All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 758–775. DOI: 10.1037/a0026578
- Jiang, Y. V. (2017). Habitual versus goal-driven attention. Cortex. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018
- Jiang, Y. V., Sha, L. Z., & Remington, R. W. (2015). Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77(7), 2189–2206. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0952-z
- Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Rosenbaum, G. M. (2013). Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 285–297. DOI: 10.1037/a0028022
- Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- TheeuwesJ. (2018). Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1(1),
29 . DOI: 10.5334/joc.13 - Wu, S., & Remington, R. W. (2003). Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(5), 1050–1067. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1050