References
- Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., van Langen, J., & Kievit, R. A. (2021). Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 63. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2
- Chao, H. F., & Hsiao, F. S. (2021). Location-response binding and inhibition of return in a detection task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 1992–2001. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02283-4
- De Jong, R. (2000).
An intention-activation account of residual switch costs . In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 357–376). MIT Press. - Dukewich, K. (2009). Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 238–251. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.238
- Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195503
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1367–1377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2. 0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2139–2154. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
- Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus–response bindings. Psychological Research, 78(4), 520–538. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0503-y
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hu, F. K., Samuel, A. G., & Chan, A. S. (2011). Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 35–50. DOI: 10.1037/a0021091
- Huff, M. J., Balota, D. A., Minear, M., Aschenbrenner, A. J., & Duchek, J. M. (2015). Dissociative global and local task-switching costs across younger adults, middle-aged adults, older adults, and very mild Alzheimer’s disease individuals. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 727–739. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000057
- Huffman, G., Hilchey, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2018). Feature integration in basic detection and localization tasks: Insights from the attentional orienting literature. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1333–1341. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1535-6
- Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124–318. DOI: 10.1037/a0014164
- JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.3.0) [Computer software].
https://jasp-stats.org/ - Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
- Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2
- Klein, R. M., Wang, Y., Dukewich, K. R., He, S., & Hu, K. (2015). On the costs and benefits of repeating a non-spatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2293–2304. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0941-2
- Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2019). Simulation-Based Power-Analysis for Factorial ANOVA Designs. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/baxsf
- Lupiáñez, J. (2010).
Inhibition of return . In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17–34). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563456.001.0001 - Lupiáñez, J., Martín-Arévalo, E., & Chica, A. B. (2013). Is inhibition of return due to attentional disengagement or to a detection cost? The detection cost theory of IOR. Psicológica, 34, 221–252.
- Lupianez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research, 71(1), 77–91. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0037-z
- Martín-Arévalo, E., Kingstone, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Is “Inhibition of Return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 347–359. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.711844
- Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777–787. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.11.6.777
- Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203–229. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.203
- Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280–1296. DOI: 10.3758/BF03212130
- Mocke, V., Weller, L., Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Kunde, W. (2020). Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 3811–3831. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 959–978. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Neill, W. T. (2007).
Mechanisms of transfer-inappropriate processing . In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 63–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/11587-004 - Neill, W. T., & Mathis, K. M. (1998).
Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena . In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 38, 1–44. Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60182-6 - Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984).
Components of visual orienting . In H. Bouma and D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Erlbaum. - Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228. DOI: 10.1080/02643298508252866
- Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distribution and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
- Schöpper, L. M., & Frings, C. (2022). Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02436-5
- Schöpper, L. M., Hilchey, M. D., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2020). Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 2085–2097. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
- Segal, D., Stasenko, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2019). More evidence that a switch is not (always) a switch: Binning bilinguals reveals dissociations between task and language switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 501–519. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000515
- Singh, T., Moeller, B., Koch, I., & Frings, C. (2018). May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1143–1156. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1498-7