References
- Abrahamse, E., Braem, S., Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2016). Grounding cognitive control in associative learning. Psychological Bulletin, 142(7), 693–728. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000047
- Altmann, E. M. (2007). Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: Evidence from backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 892–899. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.892
- Altmann, E. M. (2011). Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 935–951. DOI: 10.1037/a0022931
- Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2022). Contextual features of the cue enter episodic bindings in task switching. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 29. DOI: 10.5334/joc.220
- Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
- Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 16. DOI: 10.5334/joc.72
- Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, 44, 1255–1265. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0
- Davelaar, E. J., & Stevens, J. (2009). Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 121–126. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.121
- De Lissnyder, E., Koster, E. H. W., Derakshan, N., & De Raedt, R. (2010). The association between depressive symptoms and executive control impairments in response to emotional and non-emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 264–280. DOI: 10.1080/02699930903378354
- Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 45, 1265–1270. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000673
- Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014a). The congruency sequence effect 3.0: A critical test of conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 9,
e110462 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110462 - Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014b). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1001. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001
- Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390. DOI: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
- Egner, T. (2014). Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Frontiers in Psycholology, 5, Article 1247. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247
- Egner, T. (2017).
Conflict adaptation: Past, present, and future of the congruency sequence effect as an index of cognitive control . In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 64–78). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118920497.ch4 - Fales, C. L., Vanek, Z. F., & Knowlton, B. J. (2006). Backward inhibition in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1041–1049. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.002
- Foerster, A., Schiltenwolf, M., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2022). Binding Error-Induced Control States. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 24. DOI: 10.5334/joc.213
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be … included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus–response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1209–1227. DOI: 10.1037/a0023915
- Frings, C., Schneider, K. K., & Fox, E. (2015). The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1577–1597. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0841-4
- Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2008). Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 51–55. DOI: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51
- Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2014). Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 148, 12–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.009
- Gade, M., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list repetition and task-repetition costs. Memory & Cognition, 45, 26–39. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0645-4
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2016). Multi-Level Response Coding in Stimulus-Response Bindings: Irrelevant Distractors Retrieve Both Semantic and Motor Response Codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1643–1656. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000264
- Grange, J. A. (2018). Does task activation in task switching influence inhibition or episodic interference? Experimental Psychology, 65, 393–404. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000423
- Grange, J. A., Kedra, P., & Walker, A. (2019). The effect of practice on inhibition in task switching: Controlling for episodic retrieval. Acta Psychologica, 192, 59–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.006
- Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O’Loughlin, R. (2017). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1568–1583. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000411
- Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2139–2154. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
- Hommel, B., & Frings, C. (2020). The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 751–757. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
- Jost, K., De Baene, W., Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Journal of Psychology/Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5–14. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000125
- Kandalowski, S. R. M., Seibold, J. C., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2020). Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1632–1643. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01931-0
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1–14. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
- Koch, I., Frings, C., & Schuch, S. (2018). Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: Evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Psychological Research, 82, 570–579. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0847-9
- Kolossa, A., & Kopp, B. (2018). Data quality over data quantity in computational cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage, 172, 775–785. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.005
- Kowalczyk, A. W., & Grange, J. A. (2019). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: A diffusion model analysis. Psychological Research, 84(7), 1965–1999. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01206-1
- Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related taskswitching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130–1137. DOI: 10.1037/a0027455
- MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003).
In opposition to inhibition . In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 43, 163–214. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01014-4 - Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93–99. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196261
- Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2009). The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, 73, 794–802. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0191-1
- Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452. DOI: 10.1038/nn1051
- Mayr, U., Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R., & Keele, S. (2006). Dissociating task-set selection from task-set inhibition in prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 14–21. DOI: 10.1162/089892906775250085
- Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
- Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: a basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Moritz, S., Hübner, M., & Kluwe, R. (2004). Task switching and backward inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 677–683. DOI: 10.1080/13803390409609791
- Moutsopoulou, K., Yang, Q., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2015). Stimulus-classification and stimulus-action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1744–1757. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984232
- Moutsopoulou, K., Pfeuffer, C. U., Kiesel, A., Yang, Q., & Waszak, F. (2019). How long is long-term priming? Classification and action priming in the scale of days. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1183–1199. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818784261
- Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1291–1305. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1291
- Pettigrew, C., & Martin, R. C. (2016). The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2431–2451. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1121282
- Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 74–80. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0133-x
- Prior, A. (2012). Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag–2 task repetition costs. Cognition, 125, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.019
- Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022). Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 84, 1264–1285. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5
- Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 501–526. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450
- Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2018). Power, dominance, and constraint: A note on the appeal of different design traditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1) 19–26. DOI: 10.1177/2515245917745058
- Schmidt, J. R., De Houwer, J., & Rothermund, K. (2016). The parallel episodic processing (PEP) model 2.0: a single computational model of stimulus–response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs. Cognitive Psychology, 91, 82–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.004
- Schmidt, J. R., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2020). An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 22. DOI: 10.5334/joc.97
- Schuch, S. (2016). Task inhibition and response inhibition in older versus younger adults: A diffusion model analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1722. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01722
- Schuch, S., & Konrad, K. (2017). Investigating task inhibition in children versus adults: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 143–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.012
- Schuch, S., Werheid, K., & Koch, I. (2012). Flexible and inflexible task sets: Asymmetric interference when switching between emotional expression, sex, and age classification of perceived faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 994–1005. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.638721
- Spapé, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2008). He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1117–1121. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117
- Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590. DOI: 10.1080/14640748508400920
- Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–343. DOI: 10.1080/713755969
- Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467–472. DOI: 10.3758/CABN.5.4.467
- Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
- Whitehead, P. S., Pfeuffer, C. U., & Egner, T. (2020). Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations. Cognition, 199, 104220. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104220
- Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2007). Inhibition versus switching deficits in different forms of rumination. Psychological Science, 18, 546–553. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01936.x
- Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2012). Brain activity related to the ability to inhibit previous task sets: An fmri study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 661–670. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0118-6
- Whitmer, A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2012). Switching and backward inhibition in major depressive disorder: The role of rumination. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(3), 570–8. DOI: 10.1037/a0027474