References
- Broda, M. D., Fiehler, K., & Voudouris, D. (2020). The influence of afferent input on somatosensory suppression during grasping. Scientific Reports, 10, 18692. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75610-8
- Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157(4), 486–495. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Something in the way she moves – Movement trajectories reveal dynamics of self-control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 809–816. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0517-x
- Dixon, P., McAnsh, S., & Read, L. (2012). Repetition effects in grasping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1037/a0026192
- Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008). Noise in the nervous system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 292–303. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2258
- Fitts,
P. M., &
Posner, M.
I. (1967).
Human Performance . Belmont: Brooks/Cole. - Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Frings, C., Schneider, K. K., & Fox, E. (2015). The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1577–1597. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0841-4
- Gellermann, L. W. (1933). Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 42, 206–208. DOI: 10.1080/08856559.1933.10534237
- Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11(4), 483–521. DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000400
- Hommel, B., & Frings, C. (2020). The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(4), 751–757. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching-a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1–14. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
- Koch,
I., &
Kiesel,
A. (2022/in press).
Task switching: Cognitive control in sequential multitasking . In A. Kiesel, L. Johannsen, I. Koch & H. Müller (Eds.), Handbook of human multitasking (pp. **-**). Springer. - Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking — An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
- Los, S. A. (1999). Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs. Acta Psychologica, 103(1–2), 173–205. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00031-1
- Lukos, J. R., Choi, J. Y., & Santello, M. (2013). Grasping uncertainty: Effects of sensorimotor memories on high-level planning of dexterous manipulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 109, 2937–2946. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00060.2013
- Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 932–943. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.932
- Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77(3), 249–259. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- Mocke, V., Weller, L., Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Kunde, W. (2020). Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(8), 3811–3831. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x
- Pfister, R., Bogon, J., Foerster, A., Kunde, W., & Moeller, B. (2022). Binding and retrieval of response durations: Subtle evidence for episodic processing of continuous movement features. Journal of Cognition, 5(1): 23, 1-16. DOI: 10.5334/joc.212
- Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Wirth, R., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2014). Thinking with portals: Revisiting kinematic cues to intention. Cognition, 133(2), 464–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.012
- Philipp, A. M., Kalinich, C., Koch, I., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008). Mixing costs and switch costs when switching stimulus dimensions in serial predictions. Psychological Research, 72(4), 405–414. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0150-x
- Randerath, J., Valyear, K. F., Hood, A., & Frey, S. H. (2015). Two routes to the same action: An action repetition priming study. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47(2), 142–152. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2014.961891
- Rosenbaum, D.A., Chapman, K.M., Weigelt, M., Weiss, D.J., & Van der Wel, R. (2012). Cognition, action, and object manipulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 924–946. DOI: 10.1037/a0027839
- Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(6), 1477–1491. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477
- Schneider, T. R., Buckingham, G., & Hermsdörfer, J. (2019). Torque-planning errors affect the perception of object properties and sensorimotor memories during object manipulation in uncertain grasp situations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 121(4), 1289–1299. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00710.2018
- Schultheis, M., Straub, D., & Rothkopf, C. A. (2021). Inverse optimal control adapted to the noise characteristics of the human sensorimotor system. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34.
- Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2005). Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task. Memory and Cognition, 33(8), 1484–1494. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193380
- Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6(2), 171–178. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5
- Valyear, K. F., Fitzpatrick, A. M., & Dundon, N. M. (2019). Now and then: Hand choice is influenced by recent action history. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(1), 305–314. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1
- Varga, S., Pfister, R., Neszmélyi, B., Kunde, W., & Horváth, J. (2022). Binding of task-irrelevant action features and auditory action effects [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Journal of Cognition. DOI: 10.5334/joc.225
- Voudouris, D., Broda, M. D., & Fiehler, K. (2019). Anticipatory grasping control modulates somatosensory perception. Journal of Vision, 19(5), 4. DOI: 10.1167/19.5.4
- Weigelt, M., Cohen, R., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Returning home: locations rather than postures are recalled in human object manipulation. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 191–198. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0780-4