References
- Aben, B., Verguts, T., & Van den Bussche, E. (2017). Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 509–517. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000324
- Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., Notebaert, W., & Risko, E. F. (2013). Attention modulation by proportion congruency: The asymmetrical list shifting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1552–1562. DOI: 10.1037/a0032426
- Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
- Braem, S., Bugg, J. M., Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J. C., Weissman, D. H., Notebaert, W., & Egner, T. (2019). Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(9), 769–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.002
- Cochrane, B. A., & Pratt, J. (2022). The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84, 1–9. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02403-0
- Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 316–321. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193850
- Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523–1532. DOI: 10.1080/17470210902752096
- De Houwer, J. (2003).
A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes . In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. - De Pisapia, N., & Braver, T. S. (2006). A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing, 69(10–12), 1322–1326. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.100
- Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(9), 1265–1270. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000673
- Dignath, D., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Further evidence for the binding and retrieval of control-states from the flanker task. Experimental Psychology. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000529
- Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition, 1, 106–120. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198078
- Egner, T. (2014). Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- Foerster, A., Rothermund, K., Parmar, J. J., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021). Goal-based binding of irrelevant stimulus features for action slips. Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 206–213. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000525
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., … Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition, 114(3), 338–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.007
- Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Memory and Cognition, 40(3), 373–387. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
- Giesen, C., Schmidt, J. R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2927). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
- Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
- Güldenpenning, I., Alhaj Ahmad Alaboud, M., Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2018). The impact of global and local context information on the processing of deceptive actions in game sports: Higher head-fake frequencies and head-fake repetitions reduce the size of the head-fake effect in basketball. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 48(3), 366–375. DOI: 10.1007/s12662-018-0493-4
- Güldenpenning, I., Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2017). How to trick your opponent: A review article on deceptive actions in interactive sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00917
- Güldenpenning, I., Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., & Kunde, W. (2020). Is the head-fake effect in basketball robust against practice? Analyses of trial-by-trial adaptations, frequency distributions, and mixture effects to evaluate effects of practice. Psychological Research, 84, 823–833. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1078-4
- Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 638–644. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196526
- Jiménez, L., Gallego, D., Agra, O., Lorda, M. J., & Méndez, C. (2021). Proportion of conflict, contingency learning, and recency effects in a Stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211056813
- Klauer, K. C., Mierke, J., & Musch, J. (2003). The positivity proportion effect: A list-context effect in masked affective priming. Memory and Cognition, 31(6), 953–967. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196448
- Koch, I., Frings, C., & Schuch, S. (2018). Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: Evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Psychological Research, 82, 570–579. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0847-9
- Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 166–174. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197535
- MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 932–943. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.932
- Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 450–452. DOI: 10.1038/nn1051
- Parmar, J. J., Foerster, A., Pfister, R., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Frankly, my error, I don’t give a damn: Retrieval of goal-based but not coactivation-based bindings after erroneous responses. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 34, 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/joc.224
- Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 482–495. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.482
- Schmidt, J. R. (2013a). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 615–630. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
- Schmidt, J. R. (2013b). The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 142, 119–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004
- Schmidt, J. R. (2016). Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1496–1505. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000254
- Schmidt, J. R. (2019). Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 753–771. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1520-z
- Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514–523. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
- Schmidt, J. R., De Houwer, J., & Rothermund, K. (2016). The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs. Cognitive Psychology, 91, 82–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.004
- Schmidt, J. R., De Schryver, M., & Weissman, D. H. (2014). Removing the influence of feature repetitions on the congruency sequence effect: Why regressing out confounds from a nested design will often fall short. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(6), 2393–2402. DOI: 10.1037/a0038073
- Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 739–761. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820906397
- Schmidt, J. R., & Lemercier, C. (2019). Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1119–1130. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818787155
- Spinelli, G., & Lupker, S. J. (2021). Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(10), 1550–1562. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000820
- Spitzer, M. W. H., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2022). Performance errors influence voluntary task choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(6), 665–688. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000991
- Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
- Torres-Quesada, M., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon–Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 203–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.015
- Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Xu, G., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2020). Reliable correlational cuing while controlling for most-recent-pairing effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,
592377 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592377